Tiger-ferret
Well-known member
@camel2281 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1501681) said:@tiger-ferret said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1501554) said:@camel2281 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1501550) said:@tiger-ferret said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1501549) said:@camel2281 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1501548) said:@tony-soprano said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1501544) said:@chicken_faced_killa said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1501542) said:@tony-soprano said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1501527) said:https://twitter.com/VossySEN/status/1455983609945358341?t=fMalKVbaJ-yTU_Bg-EFn2A&s=19
Well here we go. Brooks isn’t the answer for us but who else do we have? A guess it’s a case of moving backwards to move forwards.
Could give the keys to Madden.
But a strong club would keep Brooks as back up.
A strong club would cut their losses and recruit better. Not keep a $900k player as a backup.
In all honesty if we can swap him for Klemmer or Frizell from Newy who are on similar paypackets I am happy
IMO both Klemmer and Frizell both have poor kicking games. It would be a poor swap.
Hastings is already in the building as Brooks replacement and getting a strong forward as compensation for Brooks strengthens a weakness
In all seriousness I would take frizell but Klemmer past it.
I’m very concerned with our depth in the halves if we let brooks walk.
Klemmer's numbers were awesome last year despite sometimes coming off the bench in rotation with the Saifiti twins. He averaged 164m per game for the season and 98% tackle success. He'd automatically be our best prop
Thanks for that. Certainly good numbers. Funny how perceptions can be different to reality.