Mbye’s only position in this team is 14.. this is a very important position as a game progresses do not underestimate the value he will be in that position!
I disagree completely.
Mbye would be a complete waste at 14 and our squad currently cannot afford to have him there. If we sign a fullback for 2021 Mbye goes straight to number 18. That's his position moving forwards. If there's an injury he can fill in for a number of positions but he did be nowhere near the 17.
If he's on the bench he's most likely only ever going to play hooker. And he's our 4th best hooker. He doesn't get a spot ahead of either Liddle or Simpkins.
Having your most expensive player not even making your 17 is disgraceful, and hopefully helps him move on to save face.
This is course is contingent on signing a starting fullback
Whilst I agree with your Mbye hooker assessment, I disagree he'd be only playing hooker.
Numerous times last year we had big reshuffles when someone gets injured or goes off for HIA. Look at our last game, Benji goes down, AD to 5/8, Nofa to fullback, Talau to wing and I think Chee-Kam to centre.
I even remember Brooks playing centre at one point due to injuries there.
Would be nice to have someone of Mbye's quality come in if someone in our backline goes down. Yes he's a very expensive benchie, but not playing him is even worse, and I'd argue he still improves our team in the top 17.
So you want to waste a bench spot on the offchance that we suffer an HIA or an injury? That's extremely negative thinking. Garner would play that role in any case. Do we really want to go back to Sheens style having a fullback on the bench? Yes he's a utility of sorts, and that's why he's a no 18.
We will need two hookers in our side for round one. Mbye isn't in our top 2 hookers so he doesn't get that spot. He gets fullback unless we sign a superior player. Can our pack get by with only 3 spots on the bench with the speed today's game is played at?
To be fair, our back up hooker has never played NRL and hasn’t played for over 12 months, he is a risk as well.
I think Hooker and Fullback are different.
@tigerwest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1294232) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1294211) said:
@weststigerman said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1293922) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1293901) said:
@Snake said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1293720) said:
Mbye’s only position in this team is 14.. this is a very important position as a game progresses do not underestimate the value he will be in that position!
I disagree completely.
Mbye would be a complete waste at 14 and our squad currently cannot afford to have him there. If we sign a fullback for 2021 Mbye goes straight to number 18. That's his position moving forwards. If there's an injury he can fill in for a number of positions but he did be nowhere near the 17.
If he's on the bench he's most likely only ever going to play hooker. And he's our 4th best hooker. He doesn't get a spot ahead of either Liddle or Simpkins.
Having your most expensive player not even making your 17 is disgraceful, and hopefully helps him move on to save face.
This is course is contingent on signing a starting fullback
Whilst I agree with your Mbye hooker assessment, I disagree he'd be only playing hooker.
Numerous times last year we had big reshuffles when someone gets injured or goes off for HIA. Look at our last game, Benji goes down, AD to 5/8, Nofa to fullback, Talau to wing and I think Chee-Kam to centre.
I even remember Brooks playing centre at one point due to injuries there.
Would be nice to have someone of Mbye's quality come in if someone in our backline goes down. Yes he's a very expensive benchie, but not playing him is even worse, and I'd argue he still improves our team in the top 17.
So you want to waste a bench spot on the offchance that we suffer an HIA or an injury? That's extremely negative thinking. Garner would play that role in any case. Do we really want to go back to Sheens style having a fullback on the bench? Yes he's a utility of sorts, and that's why he's a no 18.
We will need two hookers in our side for round one. Mbye isn't in our top 2 hookers so he doesn't get that spot. He gets fullback unless we sign a superior player. Can our pack get by with only 3 spots on the bench with the speed today's game is played at?
To be fair, our back up hooker has never played NRL and hasn’t played for over 12 months, he is a risk as well.
I think Hooker and Fullback are very different questions for us.
Fullback, you need to be able to take kicks and have an awareness of play. However developing those skills will help your game as a winger and even as a Center. I also think we can recruit one easily if needed as many player managers are pushing their recruits as Fullbacks. Not ideal, but liveable.
Hooker is a very different level of physical contact. Reynolds, a gritty 5/8(grit not seen in our side) couldnt switch to Hooker. He did not have the energy for it.
We have three options in our side:
Jacob Liddle
Simpkin
And Billy Walters, who played there for a little.
None of those options initially seem to be 80 minute options. Liddle and Walters were fast hookers, but not the gritty tacklers and that will count against them. I cant imagine anyone going from Reserve grade and dealing with NRL grit.
Yet we need a solid hooker or Brooks and AD dont get the ball. Yet we need cap space... risky decisions.
BTW who is AJ i cant work out which player were talking about here?