Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Vicious said:
He (Logan Brookes) looks to have added a fair bit of size over the off season.
He doesn’t look very tall, but he is now strongly built and I don’t think it’s a bad idea to at least see how he goes as a right centre.
I’m confident he would handle it well in attack, but like many young centres it would be a big test when defending.
Click to expand...
Just let his body mature. Don’t know his age but looks at least 1 to 2 years away from his body being ready
 
Vicious said:
He (Logan Brookes) looks to have added a fair bit of size over the off season.
He doesn’t look very tall, but he is now strongly built and I don’t think it’s a bad idea to at least see how he goes as a right centre.
I’m confident he would handle it well in attack, but like many young centres it would be a big test when defending.
Click to expand...

Was it Micky Tannous who played 9 a few seasons ago in a trial that everyone got excited over ?
 
balmain boy said:
Waste of a spot. Why bother promoting him? He hasn't earned a one year deal, and definitely not a 2 year deal. If Naden wasn't needed then why is Herbert? They're the same player.
Click to expand...
I guess Herbert is on a minimum dollars so he is more a cap signing. He probably will only play half dozen top grade games in two years, but his contract allows you to throw more money at the elite players. Also unlike a young rookie , Benji knows he can probably get the job done when called on. Like you it’s not a signing that excites, but to balance the books you need a few of these types of signings
 
Triple M reporting a first grader in a big Sydney Club is probably going to be medically retired - adios Toa.

Guy will probably hold his shoulder as he signs his waiver.

Just upgraded Herbert too. Whole thing makes sense.
 
Let's hope you are correct because it is the best possible outcome for both the club and Starford.

Sick of seeing him playing injured and causing long term pain and suffering to himself for the rest of his life.
 
Tito Santana said:
Triple M reporting a first grader in a big Sydney Club is probably going to be medically retired - adios Toa.

Guy will probably hold his shoulder as he signs his waiver.

Just upgraded Herbert too. Whole thing makes sense.
Click to expand...
Could be any player / any Sydney club. WT certainly can't play Toa when he is injured as we know from 2nd half of last season that doesn't work well and he is a liability. Atleast we theoretically have better depth this year
 
weststigers said:
Yes, but did you admit your mistake?

You said Sukkar was good. Perhaps you're mistaken?

Or is it subjective? For example, if I feel he isn't good, is my truth as valid as yours? Who admits the mistake in that instance?

This goes far deeper than Sukkar and his under 9's record.

You've opened a Pandora's Box.

On whether he played prop in under 7's...I don't know the truth. Perhaps Tannous himself doesn't know either. You could ask him yourself and put the matter to bed. From all reports he is a great guy and will likely respond.
Click to expand...
Bit too invested mate @weststigers
 
Tito Santana said:
Triple M reporting a first grader in a big Sydney Club is probably going to be medically retired - adios Toa.

Guy will probably hold his shoulder as he signs his waiver.

Just upgraded Herbert too. Whole thing makes sense.
Click to expand...
Roosters and Souths are the ones that get away with retiring players to suit their salary cap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 957 (members: 23, guests: 934)
Back
Top