@ said:@ said:Anasta was the barometer for a dysfunctioning club. The problems he had with us were the problems we needed to fix. Unfortunately he was a washed up player by then so it looks like he didn't put in
We still owed him money for three years after he left us that's why he said and did what he did, I think he was a rubbish player most of his career but if my employer owed me money i don't think i would be out singing his praises.
Id do the same thing and demand what was in the contract to be honoured.
Be hard for him to say good things when he left the way he did.
He was owed a TPA and given we seem to be a club that actually does them legitimately, it was at arms length from the club. No doubt he was accustomed to TPA's being dealt with differently at the Roosters. The club did not owe him anything. This was nothing to bag the club about and not something that made us "unprofessional". What is "unprofessional" is a commentator letting his petty, bitter grievances influence everything he says about a club. It's not hard to objectively commentate on the game when you're being paid to do it.