Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Independent candidates should have no formal affiliation with HBG, Magpies or Balmain (or major financial contributor to WT) or be anything greater than a member of the WT in a perfect world to hold that independency. That's just my opinion to have the best run board as possible free of any corporate or personal ties.But who decides what is the bar relating to skills experience so called academic qualifications sporting qualifications etc.
It is endless.
And it won't please everyone.
Besides, in public companies shareholders with 10% plus control have automatic qualification unless its changed.
Anyway wouldn't be surprised if Gilbert isn't shuffled around for independent candidaticy......so possible delays may be for these types of reasons.
That's really not the problem mate. If it ends up being the only issue, we'll have a very happy and united fan base.Exactly,
But there's no evidence that won't happen.
In the meantime a partner of the JV introduced toxicity going tropo in public threatening dissolution.
That's the problem.
That’s a bit harsh mate? Name a politician who hasn’t bent the rules? Name a nrl player who hasn’t been penalised over a 10 year career? Barry was in the job here for almost 12months, until the government needed his help in India he responded and became high commissioner to India.I don't feel it's disrespectful at all. It's not like he has to front up to a Centrelink office, and I'm sure the interview will be carried out in a dignified manner by professionals.
But as I said in another post...I definitely don't feel he should get the position as he was involved in a corrupt act when he was Premier of NSW, therefore Imo he can't be trusted to hold any position that carries great responsibility.
He should never have been on our board at all.
Alright so you’re agenda is 💯 “what’s the best outcome for the wests tigers?”.Gaslight lol.
You blokes turn it into an art form.
Hopefully Julie or Dennis reply to you soon about coming on the podcast to advise.I'm just interested in knowing if HBG still intend to implement the recommendations.
It is for me and apparently others, a real passion killer.That's really not the problem mate. If it ends up being the only issue, we'll have a very happy and united fan base.
And those 20 debenture holders have a stranglehold over the club in perpetuity? They're free to do whatever they want, with no accountability to anyone, ever? Because of some agreement made probably decades ago in an extremely different economic environment?
Wow. That's even worse than I thought! I thought there might be some term period or the ability for the debenture holders to vote them out.Correct
Really? He's nothing. The problem with our club is structural and we will remain on the bottom of the table unless fixed.... and currently it looks like the people who can and committed to do so, may like power more.It is for me and apparently others, a real passion killer.
I don't care if it's on the pod, just reply to the requests for comment that has come from the papers.Hopefully Julie or Dennis reply to you soon about coming on the podcast to advise.
I know they have been busy handing out community grants for HBG & posing for pics on Insta 😉
Disagree,Really? He's nothing. The problem with our club is structural and we will remain on the bottom of the table unless fixed.
That is a far greater passion killer than one numpty blabbing stupid things
I don't think that they have weaponised the review. I think they are trying to get the review recommendations implemented.Disagree,
Emails have been leaked and Balmain has weaponised the review. Check peoples earlier comments.
If you want to discuss the boards performance there are other threads.
This thread wouldn't exist without the disharmony.
Richie won’t be there long if the ‘board’ games recommenceWell much has happened.
Remember the review was commissioned by the club and is non binding.
But look,
Lee gone,
Board gone,
Richardson appointed.
Governance changes.
That' a fair bit, probably exceeded the original expectations already don't you think?
How do we know they won't try it again?I don't think that they have weaponised the review. I think they are trying to get the review recommendations implemented.
I Think what was said was incredibly stupid, distracted from and made achieving that goal much more difficult.
Implement the changes to the constitution would be a good start.How do we know they won't try it again?
So it's an ultimatum from BalmainImplement the changes to the constitution would be a good start.
That's not what I was saying mate. The updates to the constitution will limit the power fight between the share holders.So it's an ultimatum from Balmain
Well that's really problematic and it shouldn't be conditional.
So we may hear it again.