STATE OF ORIGIN GAME 1 2010 *LIVE-SPOILERS*
- Thread starter alien
- Start date
It's Belting down at the mo.- Im not that confident.
joe_s_magpies
New member
Hope Qld smashes that fraud ennis.
Don't be so confident Alien, 1st Game - QLD 24 - NSW 16
Jazza
New member
The 'experts' think the wet weather will help NSW but you still need to score points, NSW are going to have to dominate possession to outscore QLD imo.
G_Strombolli
New member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2009
- Messages
- 204
I think it will be an interesting game. I still can't get 100% behind the Blues and I'm not convinced it's a team we can build around (will Kimmorley and Lyon be there next year?). But I do think the team is stronger and the wet will benefit the Blues - attacking flair, or lack thereof, will be put aside and it'll become a forwards' game.
But until we play like we want it more than the Maroons, we'll have a hard time winning anything.
But until we play like we want it more than the Maroons, we'll have a hard time winning anything.
@G. Strombolli said:
It shouldn't matter if Noddy and Lyon won't be there next year. They should pick whoever makes the side stronger for this game. Pearce might have got in if he wasn't injured. I thought Todd Carney should have been in the side somewhere.
KingOvKingz09
New member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2009
- Messages
- 1,284
For me todd carney should of been in the team 100%
ragedmachine
New member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Messages
- 450
I'm just going through the team,
QLD are missing some key defensive units from previous games: Hodges, Smith, Price and D. Johnson.
I'm backing NSW 13+
QLD are missing some key defensive units from previous games: Hodges, Smith, Price and D. Johnson.
I'm backing NSW 13+
Tiger_Watto
New member
@Robbie said:
When Queensland are up 2 nil in the series, I'm sure Mitchell Pearce and Robbie Farah will be bought in for Game 3…
G_Strombolli
New member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2009
- Messages
- 204
@alien said:
I obviously agree that they should pick players who makes the side stronger. I also think they should select teams with an eye to the future - much of Qld's success has come from keeping the team similar and not making dramatic changes from series to series. Switching halves from series to series is a dramatic change.
On a side note, it will be interesting to see how the absence of Cameron Smith affects QLD's game…
@KingOvKingz09 said:
Absolutely. Carney should have been five-eighth. Pearce halfback if he wasn't injured. Hayne fullback, Lyon in the centres and Farah at dummyhalf. Farah hasn't been playing at his best but I would still rather him than Ennis. We would score more points with:
1\. Hayne
6\. Carney
7\. Pearce (Kimmorley whilst Pearce is injured)
9\. Farah
instead of:
1\. Gidley
6\. Lyon
7\. Kimmorley
9\. Ennis
innsaneink
Well-known member
@Robbie said:
Conditional supporter?
Weak.
Going by that, I guess you'd drop the tigers then if we signed him
king_sirro
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2009
- Messages
- 7,592
I think NSW will win tonight, but if they dont, honestly, what are they going to do? Ill discuss what drastic things i believe need to be done after the game if in fact we do lose.
Go Blues….
I think I've worked out something ...Blues selectors are biased...Tigers players never get picked cause of the Clubs form...Heeeeelllllooooo....Dogs...3 and 7....Noddy and Ennis 7 and 9... What's doing....imbo's...
I think I've worked out something ...Blues selectors are biased...Tigers players never get picked cause of the Clubs form...Heeeeelllllooooo....Dogs...3 and 7....Noddy and Ennis 7 and 9... What's doing....imbo's...
