Sutton got what he wanted

I know the referee did not cost the tigers the game, and the performance was abysmal.

But i do think he has preconcieved outcomes in his mind. In any game, theoretically, you should get around 50% of the 50/50 calls. Simple maths.

But this guy made a number of calls last night, especially in the first 20 where the storm were doing their demolition, that allowed them to continue the momentum. There was a Ken Mamaulo play the ball that he adjudged to be incorrect with defenders all over him, crowding him for way too long. The Munster try which was allowed to go on way too long in some wrestling free for all. Then a WT player dragged over near the sideline after a tackle completed.

Im certainly not saying tigers werent poor, but these crucial decisions at crucial moments just allowed the momentum to continue. Any of those calls change and it may have allowed a different start.

Again, i reiterate that the referee wasnt to blame for the performance, but anyone who doesnt think he has preconcieved ideas about teams and outcomes isnt being genuine.
 
@swordy said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393421) said:
I know the referee did not cost the tigers the game, and the performance was abysmal.

But i do think he has preconcieved outcomes in his mind. In any game, theoretically, you should get around 50% of the 50/50 calls. Simple maths.

But this guy made a number of calls last night, especially in the first 20 where the storm were doing their demolition, that allowed them to continue the momentum. There was a Ken Mamaulo play the ball that he adjudged to be incorrect with defenders all over him, crowding him for way too long. The Munster try which was allowed to go on way too long in some wrestling free for all. Then a WT player dragged over near the sideline after a tackle completed.

Im certainly not saying tigers werent poor, but these crucial decisions at crucial moments just allowed the momentum to continue. Any of those calls change and it may have allowed a different start.

Again, i reiterate that the referee wasnt to blame for the performance, but anyone who doesnt think he has preconcieved ideas about teams and outcomes isnt being genuine.
Yes, and he does this in every single game he officiates. He goes in with a favoured team, he lets them break the games neck, and then when the other team is beaten he gives them a couple of square ups to even the stats and cover his tracks… I truly cannot fathom how he had gotten away with it for this long.
 
I bagged the ref last week, but last night was all on us. We are just not good enough and somethings not right off the field.
 
@tigerneddyk said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393434) said:
@swordy said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393421) said:
I know the referee did not cost the tigers the game, and the performance was abysmal.

But i do think he has preconcieved outcomes in his mind. In any game, theoretically, you should get around 50% of the 50/50 calls. Simple maths.

But this guy made a number of calls last night, especially in the first 20 where the storm were doing their demolition, that allowed them to continue the momentum. There was a Ken Mamaulo play the ball that he adjudged to be incorrect with defenders all over him, crowding him for way too long. The Munster try which was allowed to go on way too long in some wrestling free for all. Then a WT player dragged over near the sideline after a tackle completed.

Im certainly not saying tigers werent poor, but these crucial decisions at crucial moments just allowed the momentum to continue. Any of those calls change and it may have allowed a different start.

Again, i reiterate that the referee wasnt to blame for the performance, but anyone who doesnt think he has preconcieved ideas about teams and outcomes isnt being genuine.
Yes, and he does this in every single game he officiates. He goes in with a favoured team, he lets them break the games neck, and then when the other team is beaten he gives them a couple of square ups to even the stats and cover his tracks… I truly cannot fathom how he had gotten away with it for this long.


Nepotism is the answer and always has been.I have never seen the refereeing ranks as poor as they are now.The only unbiased one is Chech.
The refs have been destroyed by the Sutton mafia and Annesley imo
 
Pretty sure there was a Melbourne player on the ground in front of Hughes when he took the quick tap and scored.

Didn't change the result, but was the usual poor standard of officiating we have seen all year.
 
@harvey said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393538) said:
Pretty sure there was a Melbourne player on the ground in front of Hughes when he took the quick tap and scored.

Didn't change the result, but was the usual poor standard of officiating we have seen all year.
[/QUOTE]

@Noosa said:
Almost all their starting 13 got tries eh?
Good little hit out for them against a team that was barely QLD cup standard.

Burleigh Bears probably would've played better.
Shout out Kurtis Rowe.
 
I can’t believe that there is a thread hinting at poor refereeing after that abysmal effort.

No deflecting blame after last night’s effort.
 
@cqtiger said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393590) said:
I can’t believe that there is a thread hinting at poor refereeing after that abysmal effort.

No deflecting blame after last night’s effort.

Ikr
Can you believe Sutton , he didn’t even try and do a tackle and help out
 
I watched it again this morning..
Yeah we were diabolical but we also got shafted by Sutton and the wankers in the bunker

Munster try ..held up .. how frigging long do they want ?

Maumalo no try ..BS obstruction call

Seyfarth penalty..where Addo Carr had a hold of Seyfarth’s jersey resulting in the ball being played on Seyfarth’s knee

Nico Hynes shielding Talau from getting to the ball from the grant grubber
 
Without doubt Sutton is a terrible ref but he did not cost us the game last night. Melbourne had all the momentum from the kick off and like with all refs they go with the team on the front foot and not the one retreating with the white flag up. Once again we have to take this result in perspective, Storm put fifty on Souths. They are a great side and the Penrith Storm GF will be a cracker
 
@hobbo1 said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393644) said:
I watched it again this morning..
Yeah we were diabolical but we also got shafted by Sutton and the wankers in the bunker

Munster try ..held up .. how frigging long do they want ?

Maumalo no try ..BS obstruction call

Seyfarth penalty..where Addo Carr had a hold of Seyfarth’s jersey resulting in the ball being played on Seyfarth’s knee

Nico Hynes shielding Talau from getting to the ball from the grant grubber


The first two Storm tries were of multiple and blatant forward passes. If that is WT possession rather that Storm points the start is completely different.
 
@tigerballs said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393801) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393644) said:
I watched it again this morning..
Yeah we were diabolical but we also got shafted by Sutton and the wankers in the bunker

Munster try ..held up .. how frigging long do they want ?

Maumalo no try ..BS obstruction call

Seyfarth penalty..where Addo Carr had a hold of Seyfarth’s jersey resulting in the ball being played on Seyfarth’s knee

Nico Hynes shielding Talau from getting to the ball from the grant grubber


The first two Storm tries were of multiple and blatant forward passes. If that is WT possession rather that Storm points the start is completely different.

I saw about 4 passes that were forward in the 1st 20 mins from the Storm that were let go. Touch judges are a waste of league money.
 
@tigerballs said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393801) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393644) said:
I watched it again this morning..
Yeah we were diabolical but we also got shafted by Sutton and the wankers in the bunker

Munster try ..held up .. how frigging long do they want ?

Maumalo no try ..BS obstruction call

Seyfarth penalty..where Addo Carr had a hold of Seyfarth’s jersey resulting in the ball being played on Seyfarth’s knee

Nico Hynes shielding Talau from getting to the ball from the grant grubber


The first two Storm tries were of multiple and blatant forward passes. If that is WT possession rather that Storm points the start is completely different.

That’s if we hold the ball ?
 
@hobbo1 said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393807) said:
@tigerballs said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393801) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Sutton got what he wanted](/post/1393644) said:
I watched it again this morning..
Yeah we were diabolical but we also got shafted by Sutton and the wankers in the bunker

Munster try ..held up .. how frigging long do they want ?

Maumalo no try ..BS obstruction call

Seyfarth penalty..where Addo Carr had a hold of Seyfarth’s jersey resulting in the ball being played on Seyfarth’s knee

Nico Hynes shielding Talau from getting to the ball from the grant grubber


The first two Storm tries were of multiple and blatant forward passes. If that is WT possession rather that Storm points the start is completely different.

That’s if we hold the ball ?


I’m trying not to laugh...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top