Team for 2020

  • Thread starter Thread starter TonyH
  • Start date Start date
@Furious1 said in [Team for 2020](/post/1061618) said:
That was my issue this year. Early in the year it always went out the back and occasionally hit the short runner (Garner). The back end of the year it seemed to always go short which becomes predictable, but i think was a result of lack of speed of our outside men. Brooks will need to find the middle ground next year with hopefully some better players outside him.

Where's Tedesco when you need him?
 
@TYGA Dissagree with this, certainly there a few we need to clear, and I do not think we want to pay for these players to play for other clubs ie Bulldogs are paying part of Mbye contract, however we have a number of young players coming through. We do not need to do wholesale changes, our team finished 9th , 1 point outside the 8, we just need to improve on this year's performance, which should be expected
 
@westTAHger said in [Team for 2020](/post/1068162) said:
team for 2020, make the finals.

unless there is quality recruitment or a plethora of juniors coming through (like back in 04 when wests and balmain had a great crop coming through , similar to a few years ago when teddy; moses et al were coming through) then 2020 will be another 9th or 10th finish. Simple as that.
 
@trentrunciman said in [Team for 2020](/post/1068734) said:
@westTAHger said in [Team for 2020](/post/1068162) said:
team for 2020, make the finals.

unless there is quality recruitment or a plethora of juniors coming through (like back in 04 when wests and balmain had a great crop coming through , similar to a few years ago when teddy; moses et al were coming through) then 2020 will be another 9th or 10th finish. Simple as that.

Well we will be on the weekly powerpoint everyweek again next year cause of contentiousn decisons......

Hopefully the referee's r better next year
 
How about team for 2021
1.AJ or lomax
2.Oates/bradly or any big winger on the market that offers us a bomb option to kick too
3.momo (gk)
4.Talau
5.nofo
6.mbye
7.Brooks
8.Aloiai
9.Liddle
10.Mikaele
11.Garner
12.MCK
13.Arrow

14.Walters
15.Clarke
16.Twal
17.Musgrove
 
@Geo said in [Team for 2020](/post/1065512) said:
1 TBA
2 TBA
3 TBA *Not Marsters
4 TBA
5 Jennings
6 TBA
7 TBA
8 TBA
9 TBA
10 TBA
11 TBA
12 TBA
13 TBA

14 TBA
15 TBA
16 TBA
17 Packer
 
@Geo said in [Team for 2020](/post/1071193) said:
@Geo said in [Team for 2020](/post/1065512) said:
1 TBA
2 TBA
3 TBA *Not Marsters
4 TBA
5 Jennings
6 TBA
7 TBA
8 TBA
9 TBA
10 TBA
11 TBA
12 TBA
13 TBA

14 TBA
15 TBA
16 TBA
17 Packer

And on that depressing note i will head to the gap
 
@Geo said in [Team for 2020](/post/1071193) said:
@Geo said in [Team for 2020](/post/1065512) said:
1 TBA
2 TBA
3 TBA *Not Marsters
4 TBA
5 Jennings
6 TBA
7 TBA
8 TBA
9 TBA
10 TBA
11 TBA
12 TBA
13 TBA

14 TBA
15 TBA
16 TBA
17 Packer

O, ye of little faith!

I reckon Packer is a special for the starting side.
 
@Cultured_Bogan

If he's as fit as people say he looks, and he develops that hunger again, i'll overlook the tongue in cheek and actually legit agree with you. 😀

We've got to get our moneys worth somehow, and if 12 months in the wilderness gets him motivated again, then so be it.
 
We are zero chance of Arrow, not even worth dreaming.....but like with Matterson, when he does find a new club there is going to be players forced onto the open market and that is where we will pick up a player or two
 
Wait a second we want Matterson to honour a contract but would be happy for Arrow or Brimson or even Lomax to break theirs..to come here...funny
 
@Geo said in [Team for 2020](/post/1071232) said:
Wait a second we want Matterson to honour a contract but would be happy for Arrow or Brimson or even Lomax to break theirs..to come here...funny

Yeah... It's only fair

:::

Spoiler Text

:::
 
@Geo The difference with Arrow, Brimson and Lomax is that their club's CAP situation is so made that theclub would be happy to release them.
 
@Newtown said in [Team for 2020](/post/1071236) said:
@Geo The difference with Arrow, Brimson and Lomax is that their club's CAP situation is so made that theclub would be happy to release them.

Dragons will not be happy to release Lomax it is more a matter if he wants out.The titans pair is a different issue
 
Well if we can nab Thompson and Lomax i reckon rd 1 could look close to this:

1 C Thompson
2. Momirovski
3. Lomax
4. Mbye
5. Nofoaluma
6. Marshall
7. Brooks
8. L Thompson
9. Reynolds
10. Twal
11. Garner
12. Chee-Kam
13. Aloiai

14. Mikaele
15. Eisenhuth
16. Packer
17. Lawrence/Taylor
 
@TSupps05 said in [Team for 2020](/post/1071466) said:
Well if we can nab Thompson and Lomax i reckon rd 1 could look close to this:

1 C Thompson
2. Momirovski
3. Lomax
4. Mbye
5. Nofoaluma
6. Marshall
7. Brooks
8. L Thompson
9. Reynolds
10. Twal
11. Garner
12. Chee-Kam
13. Aloiai

14. Mikaele
15. Eisenhuth
16. Packer
17. Lawrence/Taylor

Thompson is not available for 2020.
 
@jadtiger said in [Team for 2020](/post/1071252) said:
@Newtown said in [Team for 2020](/post/1071236) said:
@Geo The difference with Arrow, Brimson and Lomax is that their club's CAP situation is so made that theclub would be happy to release them.

Dragons will not be happy to release Lomax it is more a matter if he wants out.The titans pair is a different issue


I have read the Dragons would be keen to get Bird from the Bronks so maybe Lomax is part of the puzzle.

I get the feeling once the first trade is made there is going to be a whole lot of players on the move. Fingers crossed we are part of the action
 
@Newtown said in [Team for 2020](/post/1071236) said:
@Geo The difference with Arrow, Brimson and Lomax is that their club's CAP situation is so made that theclub would be happy to release them.


Geo ain’t the sharpest tool...
 

Members online

Back
Top