OFFICIAL Terrell May #296

[king_sirro]

Mate got a question for you

You know more then most about rugby league with all the contract talk of late can you name your top 6 players everyone else can leave but must keeps

1 to 6 west Tigers players going forward and what they are worth to the Tigers dollar wise

Gee thats a hard kne to answer.

I sort of put the brothers as one if that makes sense, so I'd go

1. Fainu's
2. May's
3. Luai
4. Maka
5. Bula

 

[426Tlgerland]

He is more important than bulla , get it done already , bulla has 2 offers on the table , send him a deadline for Wednesday next week sign or pull the offers and reject our extension for 27, tell them we won’t be using it and we are now looking for his replacement

 

[Odessa]

Gee thats a hard kne to answer.

I sort of put the brothers as one if that makes sense, so I'd go

1. Fainu's
2. May's
3. Luai
4. Maka
5. Bula

I was thinking about it with all the talk of Bula

1 Terrell
2 Luai
3 Mac
4 Tiny
5 Bula
6 Haywood

If I had to pick 6 that we had to keep

 

[mtd#2]

If it's the new CEO that's dropped the ball then yes. But Benji and Gallant are still in retention roles so maybe they dropped he ball. Whatever happened in December should have an impact of people at the club fulfilling their roles.

I dont know how an interim CEO meant is meant to pick up a negotiation and convince a player to stay when his own future isnt secure.

Even with Bula, I dont know how is he meant to buy into Shaun's plan when theres no certainty he will even be here next season.

 

[mtd#2]

He is more important than bulla , get it done already , bulla has 2 offers on the table , send him a deadline for Wednesday next week sign or pull the offers and reject our extension for 27, tell them we won’t be using it and we are now looking for his replacement

Emotion and ego have gotten in the way of outcomes for the footy side for too long.. this is the wrong approach. Until we have a better option, we should not let him go.

 

[gallagher]

I dont know how an interim CEO meant is meant to pick up a negotiation and convince a player to stay when his own future isnt secure.

Even with Bula, I dont know how is he meant to buy into Shaun's plan when theres no certainty he will even be here next season.

I'm not sure that would be a big issue. Maybe.

 

[426Tlgerland]

I'm not sure that would be a big issue. Maybe.

I agree with you on the ceo but we know who can sort this , the ones running the place and again HBG not doing the job properly , surely they know Bulla is dealing with a maybe CEO and it would not be in his best interest to sign up to maybes

 

[weststigers]

I agree with you on the ceo but we know who can sort this , the ones running the place and again HBG not doing the job properly , surely they know Bulla is dealing with a maybe CEO and it would not be in his best interest to sign up to maybes

Everyone is a maybe at Wests Tigers...that's the problem

 

[gallagher]

I agree with you on the ceo but we know who can sort this , the ones running the place and again HBG not doing the job properly , surely they know Bulla is dealing with a maybe CEO and it would not be in his best interest to sign up to maybes

100%.

 

[cochise]

If it's the new CEO that's dropped the ball then yes. But Benji and Gallant are still in retention roles so maybe they dropped he ball. Whatever happened in December should have an impact of people at the club fulfilling their roles.

It does if one of the people fulfilling the role is no longer here.

 

[mtd#2]

I'm not sure that would be a big issue. Maybe.

I cant imagine how it wouldnt be.

If I was deep in contract negotiations for a new job and a key person involved in getting me across the line was effectively pushed out of the organisation, then I'd be a numbnut if I didn't reassess the situation before signing.

If the new boss in charge was selling me a dream, but had no certainty around his own future, i probably wouldn't buy into the plan.. because how can he sell me a vision when its something he has no control over?

Anyway, each to their own, I just wouldnt be in a rush to re-sign in the current climate. Anyone we manage to sign in the near future is a bonus. Id be blown away and eat my words if we managed to sign a marquee players

 

[weststigers]

I cant imagine how it wouldnt be.

If I was deep in contract negotiations for a new job and a key person involved in getting me across the line was effectively pushed out of the organisation, then I'd be a numbnut if I didn't reassess the situation before signing.

If the new boss in charge was selling me a dream, but had no certainty around his own future, i probably wouldn't buy into the plan.. because how can he sell me a vision when its something he has no control over?

Anyway, each to their own, I just wouldnt be in a rush to re-sign in the current climate. Anyone we manage to sign in the near future is a bonus. Id be blown away and eat my words if we managed to sign a marquee players

Yep...by throwing that missile into the boardroom, that signals disunity.

Coming out and saying how unified we are 10,000 times is not very believable to most after that. Particularly when you've reinstated one of the guys that was part of the explosion in the first place...people must think they're mad?!

Not us though...we've been told they're unified.

 

[gregjm87]

Selective thinking right here at its finest.

First player was predicted to cause trouble even before he made his debut. Well known for chasing easier teams to play with.

Second player wanted to stay but wanted and NRL spot he wasnt ready for or worthy of the price tag.

May on the other hand wants to stay, yet we are sitting on our hands, coincidence? I think not

We also have 6 months to sort out an extension for him. I think this is a bit of a blow up over nothing. It should trigger a conversation from SM to May along the lines of "I saw your comments and I do want you here long term. I'll speak to you in the coming months once there is clarity around how much we can upgrade you by as I want to ensure your paid your worth. In the meantime if you have concerns my door is always open to you".

I dont know how an interim CEO meant is meant to pick up a negotiation and convince a player to stay when his own future isnt secure.

Even with Bula, I dont know how is he meant to buy into Shaun's plan when theres no certainty he will even be here next season.

He should be buying into Benji's plan not SM's.

 

[bptiger 0]

Maybe the acting CEO , should get these two players looked up , it would then go a long way to getting the gig on a permanent basis, if he’s just sitting on his hands he should be replaced ASAP

 

[gallagher]

I cant imagine how it wouldnt be.

If I was deep in contract negotiations for a new job and a key person involved in getting me across the line was effectively pushed out of the organisation, then I'd be a numbnut if I didn't reassess the situation before signing.

If the new boss in charge was selling me a dream, but had no certainty around his own future, i probably wouldn't buy into the plan.. because how can he sell me a vision when its something he has no control over?

Anyway, each to their own, I just wouldnt be in a rush to re-sign in the current climate. Anyone we manage to sign in the near future is a bonus. Id be blown away and eat my words if we managed to sign a marquee players

Agreed on re signing , but we were talking about the stop in negotiations. I don't see how it effected that. Looks like someone in the football club just dropped the ball.

 

[gallagher]

It does if one of the people fulfilling the role is no longer here.

There no guarantee Richo would have had him signed up by now

 

[hank37w]

Everyone is a maybe at Wests Tigers...that's the problem

Lots of wannabes.

 

[mtd#2]

There no guarantee Richo would have had him signed up by now

I dont know about Terrell.

What i do know is 2 x credible sources have confirmed with me that Bula was a done deal and set to be signed the week of 1 December.

I was also just reminded me that Jarome was going to remove his clauses the same week of the 1 December.

So i say with confidence we would of had Bula and Jarome locked in if it wasnt for that series of events in december.

 

[TheEnz]

I dont know about Terrell.

What i do know is 2 x credible sources have confirmed with me that Bula was a done deal and set to be signed the week of 1 December.

I was also just reminded me that Jarome was going to remove his clauses the same week of the 1 December.

So i say with confidence we would of had Bula and Jarome locked in if it wasnt for that series of events in december.

If that was the case than you would think the HBG board did what it did, when it did to kill the 2 deals or at least with knowledge that the deals would be killed. Does anyone know if any debenture holders have a nephew or grandson that is aspiring to be a 5/8 or fullback? that could explain it. Or perhaps they are so dumb that they saw the contracts and decided to punt the board so the HBG board could take all the credit. My tin foil hat is getting a workout.

 

[gallagher]

I dont know about Terrell.

What i do know is 2 x credible sources have confirmed with me that Bula was a done deal and set to be signed the week of 1 December.

I was also just reminded me that Jarome was going to remove his clauses the same week of the 1 December.

So i say with confidence we would of had Bula and Jarome locked in if it wasnt for that series of events in december.

I would agree that it would be most likely.
Again, its not what we were talking about though