Thats it - enoughs enough !!!

[Tigerdave]

Unfortunately, the guy who did his knee in, wasn't our first choice….not the coaches anyway

As for Lazarus, I say again, the guy wasn't given a good enough chance..... and that from the coach who persisted with Morris for 2 years... So instead of giving him a proper go to find his feet, he panics, chops and changes the side for 2 weeks and our structure in attack goes right out the window. Great for team morale too!

 

[stryker]

We don't need to buy a halfback … it's just our first choice one is out for the season because he did his knee against the Cowboys.

He's our second choice ….remember??

 

[hammertime]

We have enough halves there. Moltz, Lui, Lazarus and Taumata. The problem is Sheens's selections. We saw it all last year with persisting with Morris at half until we got the Moltz/Gallant combo that everyone was screaming out for since the start of the season!!

I'm seriously sick of it. Sheens does not learn from past mistakes and doesn't keep things simple for the players. We won in 05, because we played people in their positions. I just hope sheens wakes up earlier this season.

 

[Team_Tiger]

wouldnt help he'd play cronk as a forward coming off the bench lol

…with Fitzy as the starting half 😱pen_mouth:

 

[citizen_cub]

This may sound laughable to some members on this forum, but now would be a perfect time to have someone like a John Morris as he can cover a number of positions fairly competently and although many think he is not a halfback, I think he offers more as a halfback than what Lazarus and Farah have shown.

 

[BRET]

What Lazarus has shown at halfback?? HE WASN"T AT HALFBACK.

And weststigers - I am happy to agree to disagree. However I will say this - not many people on debut DO look like first grade material. It takes them a handful of games playing consistantly (in the same position) with the team to fit in to the teams style. Moltzen as good as he has become took time as well. Lazarus deserves the same chance.

 

[Snake]

Don't bag Morris i would never of let him go ..Sheens destroyed his chances as he has done with many before..John was tough plays every game and would of been a great benchy ,he was not a world beater but a player that every team should have ….Thanks Sheens

 

[BRET]

If we could of kept Morris as a bench player I would of been happy. He is more useful to us than Fitzy atm. But in no way would I of wanted to see Morris as our halfback again, or as a starting player. Utility only.

 

[AngryEmu]

We won in 05, because we played people in their positions.

We also had very few injuries that year. With the bye this week hopefully we can get a few back on deck for the Rabbitohs game at the SCG and people can go back to their normal positions.

 

[seadoggy]

we need a winger and a fullback that can break the line other than tuquiri, we also need better service and option taking from our halves, farah is not a half back, benji is not an organiser - he is an opportunist, he creates opportunities for his outside men, but he has to have good service and to start straightening his attack, otherwise by the time the outside backs have the ball, we have no room. Fowards are going well but we need 4 of them on the bench, fulton as the utility and can someone tell me why no one backs up ellis everytime he takes the ball up, he can offload EVERY time, but no one is there? An experienced half back makes a world of difference to benji, if sheens would just slot a real half back in and leave him there for 3 games in a row you would see some improvement.

 

[ragedmachine]

Sack Sheens facebook thread

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/group.php?gid=92426376173&ref=ts" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hmm I would join (and i think a lot more will as well) if that chop of sheens hanging on fire was deleted. Even though we all share the same thoughts, the image is in pretty poor taste

 

[tigerdre]

We don't need to buy a half back.Like a lot have been saying,we just need to play the players in the positions they know to play.
I'm sounding like a broken record but i can't get my head around on why we have needed this drastic re-shuffle in the past 3 weeks all because Moltzen got injured & every one says we have an injury crisis well i don't buy that.Sure we have had injuries but we have depth in this side were players injured should have been replaced with players of the same position.Simple as that!! & YES ENOUGH'S ENOUGH!!!

 

[crouching_tiger]

We won in 05, because we played people in their positions.

Who were the starting props in the 2005 grand final??

 

[system]

Sack Sheens facebook thread

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/group.php?gid=92426376173&ref=ts" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hmm I would join (and i think a lot more will as well) if that chop of sheens hanging on fire was deleted. Even though we all share the same thoughts, the image is in pretty poor taste

Maybe as well if the starter had not deleted themselves as an admin straight away.

When you don't have the stones to stand up with your real name why would I bother joining your mickey mouse group.

Results don't come from Facebook

 

[BRET]

Isn't facebook what brought back Hey Hey?

 

[system]

If thats the case than it proves the majority of Facebook users are utter spastics

 

[Mystery]

What Lazarus has shown at halfback?? HE WASN"T AT HALFBACK.

And weststigers - I am happy to agree to disagree. However I will say this - not many people on debut DO look like first grade material. It takes them a handful of games playing consistantly (in the same position) with the team to fit in to the teams style. Moltzen as good as he has become took time as well. Lazarus deserves the same chance.

HE WAS AT HALFBACK itss just he is too small and cant tackle so he defended on the wing a bit like Benji use to. Except that Benji's attack warranted him stiill bein in the side… Lazarus is overrated on this forum im sure if you ask his BRET team mates they wouldnt be talking him up as much as everyone on here... I know we all want our mates in first grade but im sorry "BRET'' he jus isnt good enough

On the topic i think that if Moltzen was not injured we wouldnt be having this discussion... Cronk would be unreal but i think we would have to get rid of too many quality players to fit him in my opinion

 

[BRET]

Would you say having the number 7 on your back but playing in 3 different positions is good for ones game?

No matter which way you look at it - he wasn't given the chance to play his natural game.

 

[citizen_cub]

What Lazarus has shown at halfback?? HE WASN"T AT HALFBACK.

And weststigers - I am happy to agree to disagree. However I will say this - not many people on debut DO look like first grade material. It takes them a handful of games playing consistantly (in the same position) with the team to fit in to the teams style. Moltzen as good as he has become took time as well. Lazarus deserves the same chance.

I'm talking about the dogs game.

 

[citizen_cub]

We won in 05, because we played people in their positions.

We also had very few injuries that year. With the bye this week hopefully we can get a few back on deck for the Rabbitohs game at the SCG and people can go back to their normal positions.

Well it was pretty obvious we were gonna play people in their right positions because the combinations were winning us football matches plus we had no major injuries to key players i.e. prince or marshall.