The NRL must INTERVENE

His mouthpiece is allegedly doing it gratis...another bloke that was involved at wests italian fella qc or barrister

Edit
Nick Di Garolimo
Great another mouth piece grinding an axe -for sport to do their best to flush out the rubbish
Doubt whether the larger % of the faceless 20 have the gumption to see it through
FinestTigers ,how many of that 20 are covered by corporate law to cover being dragged through the courts ?
 
His mouthpiece is allegedly doing it gratis...another bloke that was involved at wests italian fella qc or barrister

Edit
Nick Di Garolimo
Just to clear up the history, Nick Di Girolamo isn’t a QC barrister, and he wasn't an old Wests guy, he’s a commercial solicitor who actually sat on the Balmain board and served as Wests Tigers Deputy Chairman back in 2013–14. So, he knows the exact joint-venture skeletons inside and out. Whether he’s doing it for mates' rates or principle, having someone who already knows how the sausage gets made at Concord is a massive headache for HBG.
Great another mouth piece grinding an axe -for sport to do their best to flush out the rubbish
Doubt whether the larger % of the faceless 20 have the gumption to see it through
FinestTigers ,how many of that 20 are covered by corporate law to cover being dragged through the courts ?
As for the "magnificent 20" and corporate law protection: that’s the exact pressure point.

While formal directors usually get covered under standard Directors & Officers insurance, funded by club revenue, ordinary debenture holders don't automatically get a blank cheque from the club to defend personal constitutional challenges in the Supreme Court unless the board specifically indemnifies them.

Most of those 20 signed up to enjoy quiet perks and rubber-stamp mates onto boards, not to sit in a witness box having their personal voting motives cross-examined. Once subpoenas start flying and personal legal bills become a real possibility, watch how fast their courage turns into sudden retirement.
 
Back
Top