Apart from taking forever to get the game on, the actual coverage was horrible, absolutely horrible.
The pre game used to fire me up and have me raring to go. Last night it was painful and cringe worthy.
The Phil Gould monologues are done, heard it all before, and now they seem forced and over the top.
A new all time low with the history of State of Origin told from the view of Lang park…..whose idea was that!
Even the analysis was basic stuff, it is like they dont want to complicate things too much by providing thoughtful insight. The casual observer might find it interesting, but anyone who is a student of the game is almost insulted by it. The AFL do very interesting analysis of stats and style and areas of advantage etc, Rod Kafer in the rugby does some really great stuff that gives the viewer a great understanding of what each team is trying to achieve. Rugby league coverage could do that, but choose not to.
Yvonne Sampson is professional as a presenter and Sterlo is ok. The rest are atrocious. I thought Finchy was ok, but I like the guy and think he is great bloke, so i am almost certainly bias.
Ray Warren is a painful caller who has lost it (I dont think he was ever that good TBH) and the musings of Gould are painful. The Fatty Go QLDer stuff was ok decades ago, but is boring and annoying.
Wally, Joey, Freddy and Lockyer. 4 of the best 10 to play origin easily, between them not one interesting insight into the game at all.
Fox is light years ahead in coverage. The other sports a further ahead again.
I reckon channel 9 likes it bone head coverage, it could easily take the parts they like from other sports or fox, they have budget , but choose not to....
The pre game used to fire me up and have me raring to go. Last night it was painful and cringe worthy.
The Phil Gould monologues are done, heard it all before, and now they seem forced and over the top.
A new all time low with the history of State of Origin told from the view of Lang park…..whose idea was that!
Even the analysis was basic stuff, it is like they dont want to complicate things too much by providing thoughtful insight. The casual observer might find it interesting, but anyone who is a student of the game is almost insulted by it. The AFL do very interesting analysis of stats and style and areas of advantage etc, Rod Kafer in the rugby does some really great stuff that gives the viewer a great understanding of what each team is trying to achieve. Rugby league coverage could do that, but choose not to.
Yvonne Sampson is professional as a presenter and Sterlo is ok. The rest are atrocious. I thought Finchy was ok, but I like the guy and think he is great bloke, so i am almost certainly bias.
Ray Warren is a painful caller who has lost it (I dont think he was ever that good TBH) and the musings of Gould are painful. The Fatty Go QLDer stuff was ok decades ago, but is boring and annoying.
Wally, Joey, Freddy and Lockyer. 4 of the best 10 to play origin easily, between them not one interesting insight into the game at all.
Fox is light years ahead in coverage. The other sports a further ahead again.
I reckon channel 9 likes it bone head coverage, it could easily take the parts they like from other sports or fox, they have budget , but choose not to....