Tim Sheens masterstroke

Tm Sheens ,at the moment,is clutching at straws.

His lack of imagination is astounding.

If our team followed the coaches orders,fine.Was Ashford or simona playing tonight?

Ashford has been fabulous for the last month and hardly touched the ball all game.

oh,Mr sheens,you've done it again.!!!
what ineffective tactics
 
@tiger05 said:
@biggest tigers fan said:
Tiger05 we are getting sick of your man love for moltzen….....HE IS CRAP!!!!!

I shouldn't have trolled as being pro-Moltzen. It was as much an issue with the over the top spamming against him by most of you.

The issue is that McKinnon is terrible.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Dude we arent spamming,just telling it how it is.Until moltzen shows 2009 form i with rebel him
 
Why are we getting worse every year SHEENS you need to take soem of the blame ,we have the same old boring moves every week ,run the blight side ,farah running side woods ,kick in the corners it all getting very very boring and other teams are reading us to easy
 
@Tigersmurf said:
Imagine if Ryan had have dropped those balls…......
Click to expand...

Then you'd see the heavy hitters out. Imagine if it was Moltzen. There'd be an epic thread.

Realistically its not going to happen - Moltzen and Ryan are both 100 times the players that McKinnon is.
 
@tiger05 said:
@Tigersmurf said:
Imagine if Ryan had have dropped those balls…......

Then you'd see the heavy hitters out. Imagine if it was Moltzen. There'd be an epic thread.

**Realistically its not going to happen - Moltzen and Ryan are both 100 times the players that McKinnon is.**
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

****
Dude are you a lil :crazy
 
@Tigersmurf said:
Thats a big call 05, I would have said only 89 times!
Click to expand...

Sometimes I exaggerate to make a point. In this case I probably should have gone for the level that you've stated.

To everyone I apologize. I was wrong.
 
After Mckinnon fumbled the ball for Morris to score,i aw Moltzen warming of and thought Mckinnon was getting hooked,but what does Sheens do he hooks Gibbs for Moltzen,i dont understand
 
@biggest tigers fan said:
@tiger05 said:
@Tigersmurf said:
Imagine if Ryan had have dropped those balls…......

Then you'd see the heavy hitters out. Imagine if it was Moltzen. There'd be an epic thread.

**Realistically its not going to happen - Moltzen and Ryan are both 100 times the players that McKinnon is.**

****
Dude are you a lil :crazy
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

This is back to the same old crap from a few weeks ago when all the Lui lovers were flaming the Moltzen supporters

It sure is getting pretty boring in that every thread seems to deteriorate into a slanging match about Moltzen's playing ability or accusations against Tiger05 of being an over the top Moltzen supporter.

I think basically there are camps within the team who side with Benji and others who side with Robbie and the two factions don't play well together and Sheens has little control.

Benji and Robbie have to sort out there differences or more to the point Robbie has to step aside and let Benji captain the team. Either that or they co-captain it like Cayless and Hindmarsh at Parrra last year. Show the team they can work together and earn the teams respect.
 
@alex said:
Can everyone calling for Mckinnon to be sacked after ONE bad game please go jump.

Yep, bad game, but how solid has he been since he started with us? Take a look at yourselves…
Click to expand...

Well he only plays every second week or so cos he pulls a toe nail, and he is TOO slow to be an effective player nowadays - give me Slater, Stewart any other fullback in the league. Time to retire in pommy land Wade.
 
No one has seen the most obvious answer. Our best fullback at the moment is Mitch Brown..

Good under the high ball, runs it back hard, good defender…a touch of the Alan McMahons about him.
 
@tiger05 said:
@Tigersmurf said:
Thats a big call 05, I would have said only 89 times!

Sometimes I exaggerate to make a point. In this case I probably should have gone for the level that you've stated.

To everyone I apologize. I was wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

dont be so weak - you are entitled to your opinion
 
@Nix said:
@biggest tigers fan said:
@tiger05 said:
@Tigersmurf said:
Imagine if Ryan had have dropped those balls…......

Then you'd see the heavy hitters out. Imagine if it was Moltzen. There'd be an epic thread.

**Realistically its not going to happen - Moltzen and Ryan are both 100 times the players that McKinnon is.**

****
Dude are you a lil :crazy

This is back to the same old s*** from a few weeks ago when all the Lui lovers were flaming the Moltzen supporters

It sure is getting pretty f-ing boring in that every thread seems to deteriorate into a slanging match about Moltzen's playing ability or accusations against Tiger05 of being an over the top Moltzen supporter.

I think basically there are camps within the team who side with Benji and others who side with Robbie and the two factions don't play well together and Sheens has little control.

Benji and Robbie have to sort out there differences or more to the point Robbie has to step aside and let Benji captain the team. Either that or they co-captain it like Cayless and Hindmarsh at Parrra last year. Show the team they can work together and earn the teams respect.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Benji didn't play tonight,can't blame him.
 
@happy tiger said:
@MacDougall said:
I was daydreaming of sticking it to Sheens.

"Tim, at any stage, when you have a fullback on the wing, a five-eighth playing fullback, a centre on the other wing, a backrower at centre, hooker at halfback, a halfback at hooker and a winger in the backrow, do you stop and think to yourself… am I doing it wrong?"

Quote of the year so far MacDougall LMFAO . But in all seriousness the way we should of played was the was the we finished . Miller hooker , Farah half and Lui five eight . How we expected to create anything we rookie halves and our only other attacking weapon playing hooker
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Yes and the commentators agreed with you Happy. Not that I would necessarily back the commentators all that often but I agree with them this once, we had more in attack when Farah changed to a half role. Another thing I couldn't follow at the ground was when McKinnon let the second try in, Gibbs is replaced!! I'll have to look at the replay to see whether Gibbs did something wrong I thought at the time that he should have stayed on we needed his defence. I can't see the benefit in resting Heighno the bloke has been playing well in attack and defence and yet he spends time on the bench :crazy
 
sorry - but i cant agree with commentators - they dont invest into the team as much as we do - therefore are basically are talking out of their you know what. if we put farah at half we might as well put mckinnon at prop. He runs just as fast as one.
 
@AmericanHistoryX said:
sorry - but i cant agree with commentators - they dont invest into the team as much as we do - therefore are basically are talking out of their you know what. if we put farah at half we might as well put mckinnon at prop. He runs just as fast as one.
Click to expand...

AHX your joking aren't you The only time we looked dangerous was when Farah was 1st reciever in the 2nd half . How do you put two halves together that have rarely if ever played together and expect them to gel with maybe 3-4 training days and take apart a well organized defence .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 804 (members: 21, guests: 783)
Back
Top