Why are downvotes limited?

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265321) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265299) said:
If you disagree with someone, tell them. Don’t know why clicking a little thumb is your preferred method.

I explained it the first post "There are many people on this forum that it is pointless to argue with, no facts or evidence will sway them."

It is not my job to prove a post is wrong. I don't have the patience of @jirskyr, he carefully explains why he disagrees with a post, spends his time providing evidence and making a reasoned argument and the next day the original poster will restate their original claim.

The same people post the same rubbish every day on this forum, so it ends up looking like the truth. There are many unfounded rumours that the majority of this forum believe just because it has been posted so many times it has become the truth. Downvoting is a quick, easy way of saying that I don't agree with a post. Why is that bad?

So your right every time ..
 
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265321) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265299) said:
If you disagree with someone, tell them. Don’t know why clicking a little thumb is your preferred method.

I explained it the first post "There are many people on this forum that it is pointless to argue with, no facts or evidence will sway them."

It is not my job to prove a post is wrong. I don't have the patience of @jirskyr, he carefully explains why he disagrees with a post, spends his time providing evidence and making a reasoned argument and the next day the original poster will restate their original claim.

The same people post the same rubbish every day on this forum, so it ends up looking like the truth. There are many unfounded rumours that the majority of this forum believe just because it has been posted so many times it has become the truth. Downvoting is a quick, easy way of saying that I don't agree with a post. Why is that bad?

Anything that is based on opinion is effectively pointless to argue, because it is subjective.

If you're negging 30 posts a day rather than expressing why you disagree, then that would suggest that the rep system is actively working against what a forum is set up to do: have people engage with one another, be it positive or negative.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265323) said:
So your right every time …

Facts and evidence are what proves something is right.

Posting the same opinion 100 times does not.
 
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265330) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265323) said:
So your right every time …

Facts and evidence are what proves something is right.

Posting the same opinion 100 times does not.

But you don't post your facts or evidence .....and as you said about a week ago in a reply to me you want a Forum set up the way you like it

I'm sorry it isn't going to happen
 
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265328) said:
Anything that is based on opinion is effectively pointless to argue, because it is subjective.
If you’re negging 30 posts a day rather than expressing why you disagree, then that would suggest that the rep system is actively working against what a forum is set up to do: have people engage with one another, be it positive or negative.

The original question which still has not been answered, is why we can only downvote 10 posts a day.

There is no limit on upvotes, are they different somehow?

I can post that a player, coach or member of Tigers management is puke a thousand times, there is no limit on spamming an opinion.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265331) said:
But you don’t post your facts or evidence …and as you said about a week ago in a reply to me you want a Forum set up the way you like it

You were butting in on a discussion between me and another member and it seemed like you had not read the previous posts.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265323) said:
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265321) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265299) said:
If you disagree with someone, tell them. Don’t know why clicking a little thumb is your preferred method.

I explained it the first post "There are many people on this forum that it is pointless to argue with, no facts or evidence will sway them."

It is not my job to prove a post is wrong. I don't have the patience of @jirskyr, he carefully explains why he disagrees with a post, spends his time providing evidence and making a reasoned argument and the next day the original poster will restate their original claim.

The same people post the same rubbish every day on this forum, so it ends up looking like the truth. There are many unfounded rumours that the majority of this forum believe just because it has been posted so many times it has become the truth. Downvoting is a quick, easy way of saying that I don't agree with a post. Why is that bad?

So your right every time ..

*You're*
 
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265333) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265331) said:
But you don’t post your facts or evidence …and as you said about a week ago in a reply to me you want a Forum set up the way you like it

You were butting in on a discussion between me and another member and it seemed like you had not read the previous posts.

Why can't I butt in for ...Can't anyone give an opposing argument to your posts ...you can't have it both ways ..you can't rebutt people and then be a protected species and not have someone oppose your opinion
 
@CarltonDry said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265337) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265323) said:
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265321) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265299) said:
If you disagree with someone, tell them. Don’t know why clicking a little thumb is your preferred method.

I explained it the first post "There are many people on this forum that it is pointless to argue with, no facts or evidence will sway them."

It is not my job to prove a post is wrong. I don't have the patience of @jirskyr, he carefully explains why he disagrees with a post, spends his time providing evidence and making a reasoned argument and the next day the original poster will restate their original claim.

The same people post the same rubbish every day on this forum, so it ends up looking like the truth. There are many unfounded rumours that the majority of this forum believe just because it has been posted so many times it has become the truth. Downvoting is a quick, easy way of saying that I don't agree with a post. Why is that bad?

So your right every time ..

*You're*

Yaw ..........yeah
 
In the past we had people have all out wars with each other over down-voting

You will survive if you run out of your daily quota
 
I don't want to fight everyone and I understand that people want different things out of the forum.

I think the forum could be better for everyone if the rules were enforced.

The same people hijack every thread with jokes and banter, like they have with this one taking about cats and magpies.
The same Negative Nellie's post the same things over and over and the Positive Pollyanna's rarely post because how do you argue with "Luke Brooks is pus"
 
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265343) said:
I don't want to fight everyone and I understand that people want different things out of the forum.

I think the forum could be better for everyone if the rules were enforced.

The same people hijack every thread with jokes and banter, like they have with this one taking about cats and magpies.
The same Negative Nellie's post the same things over and over and the Positive Pollyanna's rarely post because how do you argue with "Luke Brooks is pus"

I really enjoyed the cats and magpie discussion.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265338) said:
Why can’t I butt in for …Can’t anyone give an opposing argument to your posts …you can’t have it both ways …you can’t rebutt people and then be a protected species and not have someone oppose your opinion

You can post whatever you like, but if you are deliberately misrepresenting a previous post for arguments sake I am not going to engage with you.

You seem to have ignored where I said that you butted in without reading the previous posts.
 
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265343) said:
I don't want to fight everyone and I understand that people want different things out of the forum.

I think the forum could be better for everyone if the rules were enforced.

The same people hijack every thread with jokes and banter, like they have with this one taking about cats and magpies.
The same Negative Nellie's post the same things over and over and the Positive Pollyanna's rarely post because how do you argue with "Luke Brooks is pus"

As it is everyone's right to be a negative nelly or positive pollyanna ...and if you don't back up your differing opinion you aren't going to change anyone's mind

And if a Mod wants to bring up cats ...good luck to them ..they put a helluva lot of time in keeping the Forum normal and sane
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265345) said:
I really enjoyed the cats and magpie discussion.

That's great but why can't there be banter sections where people can relax and have fun and content sections like "Signing suggestions and rumours"
 
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265347) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265338) said:
Why can’t I butt in for …Can’t anyone give an opposing argument to your posts …you can’t have it both ways …you can’t rebutt people and then be a protected species and not have someone oppose your opinion

You can post whatever you like, but if you are deliberately misrepresenting a previous post for arguments sake I am not going to engage with you.

You seem to have ignored where I said that you butted in without reading the previous posts.

I had and disagreed with your opinion ..same as you are disagreeing with many's opinion's now

Some on here like a joke or banter after a hard's days work ..Mods pull it up if it goes over the top ..it's their Forum when push comes to shove ...you have to live by their rules ..bit like when you get a home loan ..you choose what you want ...don't complain when your not happy with it ...change banks
 
This thread is like being on the playground at school when punches are about to be thrown. Smile on your face while looking over your shoulder hoping the teacher doesn’t come over and shut it down.
 
@Sart0ri said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265349) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265345) said:
I really enjoyed the cats and magpie discussion.

That's great but why can't there be banter sections where people can relax and have fun and content sections like "Signing suggestions and rumours"

Because civilised people have conversations.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265352) said:
I had and disagreed with your opinion …same as you are disagreeing with many’s opinion’s now
Some on here like a joke or banter after a hard’s days work …Mods pull it up if it goes over the top …it’s their Forum when push comes to shove …you have to live by their rules …bit like when you get a home loan …you choose what you want …don’t complain when your not happy with it …change banks

So I should leave the forum if I don't agree with you?

If what you are saying is correct, the forum rules should be changed to reflect that. The rules about abusing players and officials should be removed. The rules about hijacking threads should be removed.
 
@Red88_Tiger said in [Why are downvotes limited?](/post/1265354) said:
This thread is like being on the playground at school when punches are about to be thrown. Smile on your face while looking over your shoulder hoping the teacher doesn’t come over and shut it down.

Nah mate ...just stating you'll never have a perfect forum and it would turn me off if we ever did
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top