Why are the mods so uptight and deprived of a sense of humor

@magpie mania said:
@smeghead said:
Magpie Mania.

I am not weighing into this debate you are having with Chris. However take this as a final warning on an issue I recieve countless complaints about. Keep typing in all caps lock and you will find yourself on moderator preview. It is annoying, hard on the eyes and complained about numerous times

Your not weighing into the debate but after writing in caps lock for over six months with not the slightest word you are now giving me this warning five minutes after my last post slightly coincidental wouldnt you say.Perhaps I can become an advisor to you moderators.

De modded myself a while ago only came back to it today.

I remember talking to you about it in a thread and stating how annoying it is months ago. Seeing a wall of Caps lock text reminded me hence the post.

On the upside your posts are now something which doesn't make people want to scroll over them to save their retinas some work.

But if you would prefer to call conspiracy in spite of this fact than I am not stopping you
 
@smeghead said:
@magpie mania said:
@smeghead said:
magpie mania.

I am not weighing into this debate you are having with chris. However take this as a final warning on an issue i recieve countless complaints about. Keep typing in all caps lock and you will find yourself on moderator preview. It is annoying, hard on the eyes and complained about numerous times

your not weighing into the debate but after writing in caps lock for over six months with not the slightest word you are now giving me this warning five minutes after my last post slightly coincidental wouldnt you say.perhaps i can become an advisor to you moderators.

de modded myself a while ago only came back to it today.

I remember talking to you about it in a thread and stating how annoying it is months ago. Seeing a wall of caps lock text reminded me hence the post.

yeah like the post where i said galloway would be out a few weeks ago two days before anyone else knew about it or how todd payten would come back early against the roosters and the list goes on maybe your retinas didnt notice these.as i have links to first graders i will continue to let the fans know.
 
Smeg, you avatar is a deadset cracker… I started pissing myself laughing in the middle of my office :laughing:
 
@magpie mania said:
Yeah like the post where i said galloway would be out a few weeks ago two days before anyone else knew about it or how todd payten would come back early against the roosters and the list goes on maybe your retinas didnt notice these.as i have links to first graders i will continue to let the fans know.

Thats good. It now means they can read it without having to look at all caps posts.

We are lucky on this forum. Between the voice of the people and the man on the ground with links to the players. They should just take the club website offline now. It is redundant
 
@smeghead said:
@magpie mania said:
@smeghead said:
magpie mania.

I am not weighing into this debate you are having with chris. However take this as a final warning on an issue i recieve countless complaints about. Keep typing in all caps lock and you will find yourself on moderator preview. It is annoying, hard on the eyes and complained about numerous times

your not weighing into the debate but after writing in caps lock for over six months with not the slightest word you are now giving me this warning five minutes after my last post slightly coincidental wouldnt you say.perhaps i can become an advisor to you moderators.

de modded myself a while ago only came back to it today.

I remember talking to you about it in a thread and stating how annoying it is months ago. Seeing a wall of caps lock text reminded me hence the post.

On the upside your posts are now something which doesn't make people want to scroll over them to save their retinas some work.

But if you would prefer to call conspiracy in spite of this fact than i am not stopping you

for a bloke not weighing in to an argument and looking to save his retinas my post seems to be getting some action wouldnt you think.conspiracy or fact smeg.
 
@fergiefurr said:
@chris said:
it's not a recent thing, your typing style has been discussed amongst us moderators for a long time now.

lol cmon surely the mods have better things to talk about

chris is our go to guy for all our typing needs i could use you on weekends chris to post my quotes.not "attacking" you chris but you are our special forces typing commando. :righton: :righton: :righton:
 
Funnily enough your posts are not in caps now.

Maybe it is magic my young cracticus tibicen.

As for weighing in. One would assume any reasonable individual can see that this is quite seperate to any spat you are having with Chris. If you wish to carry on with that than that is your choice as it's not something I am involved in
 
anyone catch QI last night?

Godwin's Law:

Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's law of Nazi Analogies)[1][2] is a humorous observation made by Mike Godwin in 1990 which has become an Internet adage. It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."[3][2]
>
Godwin's law is often cited in online discussions as a deterrent against the use of arguments in the widespread reductio ad Hitlerum form. The rule does not make any statement about whether any particular reference or comparison to Adolf Hitler or the Nazis might be appropriate, but only asserts that the likelihood of such a reference or comparison arising increases as the discussion progresses. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued[4] that overuse of Nazi and Hitler comparisons should be avoided, because it robs the valid comparisons of their impact.
>
Although in one of its early forms Godwin's law referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions,[5] the law is now applied to any threaded online discussion: electronic mailing lists, message boards, chat rooms, and more recently blog comment threads, wiki talk pages, and social networking sites.
 
:slight_smile: Another reason to smile.

Didn't catch it last night. Was working away in the editing suite
 
@smeghead said:
funnily enough your posts are not in caps now.

Maybe it is magic my young cracticus tibicen.

As for weighing in. One would assume any reasonable individual can see that this is quite seperate to any spat you are having with chris. If you wish to carry on with that than that is your choice as it's not something i am involved in

yes cracticus tibicen i am(magpie) but do you know what you are smeghead.maybe you should google it. :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton:
 
@kaiser said:
wow… Like kul asked... **if anyone has any ideas on what we can do to give the users here a better expirience, we are all ears. I, just like kul sincerely mean that.** we have put alot of work and time into this site and only want the best for every member.

Without weighing into the arguement too much, please keep in mind that we have a very active forum. While you might feel something isn't offensive, others may. This is something you need to respect ron. I am by all means a very easy going person and have very relaxed views on many things in life, but when push comes to shove, this is a community... In which it is much larger than me and my own personal beliefs, as it is yours.

We would love to keep everyone here happy and welcome... We want it to be a family friendly site, were people of all ages can enjoy.

If you find being apart of this community difficult, i am sorry, but we won't change the rules for one individual.

well said kaiser.
 
As I am a Red Dwarf tragic I think I may have some idea of the username meaning. :slight_smile:
 
@chris said:
there is one certain forum that was closed down and being investigated because of the content in those forums.

i heard about a forum like that. I have never seen it though. I was told you need a password or something to see it. I was told that someone was pretending to be me on there.
 
@southerntiger said:
@kaiser said:
wow… Like kul asked... **if anyone has any ideas on what we can do to give the users here a better expirience, we are all ears. I, just like kul sincerely mean that.** we have put alot of work and time into this site and only want the best for every member.

Without weighing into the arguement too much, please keep in mind that we have a very active forum. While you might feel something isn't offensive, others may. This is something you need to respect ron. I am by all means a very easy going person and have very relaxed views on many things in life, but when push comes to shove, this is a community... In which it is much larger than me and my own personal beliefs, as it is yours.

We would love to keep everyone here happy and welcome... We want it to be a family friendly site, were people of all ages can enjoy.

If you find being apart of this community difficult, i am sorry, but we won't change the rules for one individual.

well said kaiser.

well said kaiser you are a breath of fresh air.
 
@alien said:
@chris said:
there is one certain forum that was closed down and being investigated because of the content in those forums.

i heard about a forum like that. I have never seen it though. I was told you need a password or something to see it. I was told that someone was pretending to be me on there.

Don't you just hate when that happens! :unamused:
 
@chris said:
@alien said:
@chris said:
there is one certain forum that was closed down and being investigated because of the content in those forums.

i heard about a forum like that. I have never seen it though. I was told you need a password or something to see it. I was told that someone was pretending to be me on there.

don't you just hate when that happens! :unamused:

what's with the rolling eyes? Are you being sarcastic?
 
@fergiefurr said:
@chris said:
it's not a recent thing, your typing style has been discussed amongst us moderators for a long time now.

lol cmon surely the mods have better things to talk about

it is very annoying. It's the kind of thing they should be talking about.
 
Back
Top