Jedi_Tiger
Well-known member
remember in the early 90's they were a basket case then they got Packer on the board and bought Fitler and Gould and the rest is history
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tig_prmz said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322023) said:@tilllindemann said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1321109) said:And I don't buy that their 'culture' is better than ours. They've had numerous off-field player dramas over the years.
But partly due to being based in the eastern suburbs they are seen as a 'glamour club' and this helps them no end.
I think culture is more about what happens on the training paddock than off it.
Like for eg the Morris brothers seem to be thorough professionals- imagine someone like Sualii who can learn things about game day prep, how to calm down in pressure situations etc. It's about being in a culture where there is a clear hierarchy with mutual respect and trust among teammates.
I don't see Laurie learning much professionalism off guys like Roberts/BJ.
@jedi_tiger said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322057) said:@tig_prmz said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322023) said:@tilllindemann said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1321109) said:And I don't buy that their 'culture' is better than ours. They've had numerous off-field player dramas over the years.
But partly due to being based in the eastern suburbs they are seen as a 'glamour club' and this helps them no end.
I think culture is more about what happens on the training paddock than off it.
Like for eg the Morris brothers seem to be thorough professionals- imagine someone like Sualii who can learn things about game day prep, how to calm down in pressure situations etc. It's about being in a culture where there is a clear hierarchy with mutual respect and trust among teammates.
I don't see Laurie learning much professionalism off guys like Roberts/BJ.
Sonny Bill is mentoring Sualli apparently
@dgilly said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1321023) said:@blake said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1321021) said:Without bashing the Tigers, what do you think makes the Roosters so good? They embarrassed the Tigers with no hooker, a Keary playing a new position, an ordinary 5/8 and a worse 5/8 on the bench. They also had a front rower kicking goals.
* For me it all comes down to speed and urgency
* They had 3 defenders in every tackle but never seemed to be short anywhere.
* No one in the NRL seems to be able to tackle Tedesco front on, he just bounces back and runs again
* They all compete on every play, no one is lazy
Better culture and systems too. Smarter players
@adelaidetiger said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322127) said:Trent Robinson, bloke knows footy, and he always seems to know how the coming year will play out.
@adelaidetiger said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322127) said:Trent Robinson, bloke knows footy, and he always seems to know how the coming year will play out.
@strongee said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322135) said:@adelaidetiger said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322127) said:Trent Robinson, bloke knows footy, and he always seems to know how the coming year will play out.
It’s pre Trent Robinson man . Phil Gould put the systems in place in the 90s , and every single person since then has just added to it , even brad Fittler .
@twentyforty said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322139) said:@adelaidetiger said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322127) said:Trent Robinson, bloke knows footy, and he always seems to know how the coming year will play out.
Good point Adelaide. It may even go a ways to explaining why the chooks make fewer mistakes? Why their seemingly flippant passes stick?
Robo generally has a vision of the way things play out and getting that right mostly allows the players to buy in easily. But it’s easier to be a visionary when you have enormous depth and a winning team.
I don’t really know what vision WT have, have never really read any goals which could provide some direction or allow me to gauge their performance with any confidence, but I do see the roster improving and the cap being better managed.
@twentyforty said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322152) said:A journo asked Robo the same question recently. “What makes the Roosters so good? What tips can you share to other struggling clubs, like for instance, the Tigers?”
His response was basically.”.get your club organised! Start fixing the admin. it’s not rocket science.”
Thanks for nothing Robo 😂
He’s right, our team is representative of the entire organisation. It’s just not possible to be any other way. Organisations are culture driven, if they have lazy people on the front line, then they have lazy people in the back office. What you see is what you get.
Take a look at the team? We have one player who gets MVP points in a side that goes down by 34 points. We probably have a similar amount of goals focussed people in back of house when extrapolated?
@yeti said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322103) said:They had a training camp up here in Mullumbimby before the season started. Their training is INTENSE! Everything they do is at 100mph. They are focused for the entire period they are on the field. No mucking around. They get stuck into each other.
You would have sworn that Chrichton was from an opposing team the way they smashed him time and time again. It was incredible.
@jirskyr said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322179) said:@yeti said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322103) said:They had a training camp up here in Mullumbimby before the season started. Their training is INTENSE! Everything they do is at 100mph. They are focused for the entire period they are on the field. No mucking around. They get stuck into each other.
You would have sworn that Chrichton was from an opposing team the way they smashed him time and time again. It was incredible.
I'm pretty sure Tigers train that way - that is the Bellamy school of coaching, where you train at match-level intensity so you learn to make decisions and apply effort under realistic extreme conditions. And Madge being one of the first Bellyache acolytes.
@adelaidetiger said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322140) said:@strongee said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322135) said:@adelaidetiger said in [Why are the Rooster better?](/post/1322127) said:Trent Robinson, bloke knows footy, and he always seems to know how the coming year will play out.
It’s pre Trent Robinson man . Phil Gould put the systems in place in the 90s , and every single person since then has just added to it , even brad Fittler .
The Roosters have had many a dark day since the 90s, Brad Fittler is arguably one of the worst ever head coaches in the NRL, he was on the back page of the paper every single day. I agree the Roosters have had good times prior to Robbo, and yes their organisation as a whole is very good (mostly because of cash allowing them to poach juniors from other Sydney clubs), but their current success is almost purely because of Robbo. I guess the thread question is vague.