mike
Well-known member
@radoush said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435650) said:@earl said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435648) said:@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435550) said:@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435501) said:@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435222) said:@voice_of_reason said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435214) said:@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435203) said:You're the one that needs to start thinking for himself. He and many other doctors like him helped many patients through covid treatments.
No he didn't, he spread untruths and fake medicine and is being investigated for it. He's been widely discredited by his peers. As far as COVID is concerned he's a dangerous quack.
You're free to believe him (at your peril), but don't expect others to be on bended knee before him.
Only thing thats fake is your blind trust to an experimental jab. Instead we have many doctors like Dr Mcullough who have had great results treating covid.
For goodness sake even the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology **Dr Robert Malone** has spoken about the dangers of the spike protein created from the experimental jab.
Again, Dr Robert Malone Is not the inventor of the mRNA vaccines or technology. He is a professor that once wrote a paper about in 1989. Yes it was an influential paper but he is definitely not the inventor. It’s like saying H.G. Wells invented space travel because he wrote about it.
Do you enjoy disagreeing with me for the sake of it? He is the inventor of mRNA vaccines
You still don't get this do you. A single persons opinion is irrelevant. Do you understand this ? The facts matter. Opinions do not matter.
Do you realize that people are dying ? Do you realize basically no one who is fully vaccinated is dying ?
Your glass is full no point trying to reason with you
But you are not trying to reason with anyone. The thinking you have put forward so far does not hold up against scrutiny. The items you put forward are not supported by evidence. They are basically pseudoscience arguments and lack critical thinking.
I’ll go wherever the evidence goes. Opinion is not evidence. Antidotal accounts are not evidence. Where’s the evidence?