Surely the only reason for a structured restart in this instance was if there was a penalty, if there was no infringement then there was not a restart at all as the game was over. This is what the NRL are claiming was their justification for allowing a challenge. Haven’t they now opened up that...
Is it not surprising we are paying him less than when he left. He was playing Origin and first choice hooker for first grade when he signed that contract and when we re-signed him he was playing reserve grade and nowhere near Origin.
So, if this was all in the media at the time, including the NRL.com site then why did the NRL not say anything when we asked for salary cap dispensation for Robbie’s payments whilst he was at Souths? Nothing seems to confirm it, but I assume the NRL allowed the dispensation, so haven’t they been...
It may have been the Blue tinted view I had of the game, but I actually thought when they showed the ref cam view of the incident when Sims got up to play the ball, Hunt grabbed him first around the shoulders and was pulling him down. Sims then seemed to follow through and take him to ground...
Generally after a loss from a bad call I get to the point where the frustration dies down after reading everyone else's rant on here, but I am still as angry as the first post I read after that disgusting decision… I think I had better go to bed to calm down...
Really??? A show of skill from Thurston???? He had 50m to the nearest defender and kicked and passed the ball to someone who strolled under the posts. I could have done that