WT Ownership, The Board & Senior Management - MEGA Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’ll say this about the board.
The results we’re seeing today are due to the boards decisions from yesterday.
Hope that evens the ledger?
 
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518022) said:
I’ll say this about the board.
The results we’re seeing today are due to the boards decisions from yesterday.
Hope that evens the ledger?


You lost your opportunity to say something meaningful dude hahaha
 
@innsaneink said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517957) said:
Talk about going off topic... This one's a doozy.... From the WTs board, to the media guy... Too first home owners.... Can we get Santa in to?

The Wests Tigers bored
 
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517903) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517878) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517675) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517639) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517498) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517369) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517154) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517105) said:
Maybe he was bored?

A lot of people reassessing their personal situation relevant to employment and lifestyle as this Covid-19 spread continues.


me included

I know its a slight deviation from the thread topic, but can I share an interesting stat from core logic? 25% of home buyers are investors who live in their new purchase while renovating, then after a year or two sell or lease to tenants. Sure, there has always been this sort of activity in the res property market but not at this level. I know a couple who have been doing this for 20 years, however, more recently quit their jobs to devote more of their time to this lucrative "hobby."

It's wankers like that that mean young families can't afford to buy a house

Lol..How do you draw that conclusion? Are you saying if they didn’t improve res properties it wouldn’t increase their value? Or because they could own 2 or 3 at the same time there is a short supply?
I guess it’s the BJ prophecy? Always someone else’s fault. People have no influence over their own goals because of other people creating problems for them?
Maybe you’re right.



"A young family may have a max budget of 1 million to buy a house in sydney. Can’t possibly go higher, and whenthey buy they’re moving in to live, raise their family, and maybe do renos at some point in time down the track. Flippers might offer 1.1million for the same property, knowing they’ll recoup their higher expenditure by doing the place up, and sell for 1.5-1.6 million a few years later."

There are two flaws in your assumptions..
1. You are assuming that the “young family” are always competing with the wealthier “Flipper.” This can only be possible on 25% or less of occasions, because that is the number of possible “Flippers” identified by Core Logic.
2. The average home turnover is 7 years, this includes all homes including your “young family” who have possibly renovated and increased the value before their sale.


"This destroys the opportunities for young people to buy a house in the first case as they offer more cash upfront, pricing young people out of the market. And then when they re-sell in a few years time that house in the suburb which was once 1 million is now 1.6 million, which further inhibits other young people from buying a property in that area.
Of course properties increase in value due to other factors, like location, but it’s the flippers and foreign investors who are pushing many young people to the outer limits of the city"

3. Australia’s economic prosperity depends a lot on Business and housing construction. The rules of the game are set by the ATO and our governments. The people (buyers) who participate in the game are not “wankers” as you call them, but buyers with different motivations. The prices are driven by policy, population growth, immigration, jobs etc., not by Flippers who are doing what the governments expect of them..creating jobs and tax revenue.
4. I can agree with you at least on the foreign buyers creating a problem and the increased states’ stamp duties along with the tougher lending criteria don’t go far enough imo.


what does this have to do with the board? get a thread and sort this drivel out - so I can block it
 
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518278) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517903) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517878) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517675) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517639) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517498) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517369) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517154) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517105) said:
Maybe he was bored?

A lot of people reassessing their personal situation relevant to employment and lifestyle as this Covid-19 spread continues.


me included

I know its a slight deviation from the thread topic, but can I share an interesting stat from core logic? 25% of home buyers are investors who live in their new purchase while renovating, then after a year or two sell or lease to tenants. Sure, there has always been this sort of activity in the res property market but not at this level. I know a couple who have been doing this for 20 years, however, more recently quit their jobs to devote more of their time to this lucrative "hobby."

It's wankers like that that mean young families can't afford to buy a house

Lol..How do you draw that conclusion? Are you saying if they didn’t improve res properties it wouldn’t increase their value? Or because they could own 2 or 3 at the same time there is a short supply?
I guess it’s the BJ prophecy? Always someone else’s fault. People have no influence over their own goals because of other people creating problems for them?
Maybe you’re right.



"A young family may have a max budget of 1 million to buy a house in sydney. Can’t possibly go higher, and whenthey buy they’re moving in to live, raise their family, and maybe do renos at some point in time down the track. Flippers might offer 1.1million for the same property, knowing they’ll recoup their higher expenditure by doing the place up, and sell for 1.5-1.6 million a few years later."

There are two flaws in your assumptions..
1. You are assuming that the “young family” are always competing with the wealthier “Flipper.” This can only be possible on 25% or less of occasions, because that is the number of possible “Flippers” identified by Core Logic.
2. The average home turnover is 7 years, this includes all homes including your “young family” who have possibly renovated and increased the value before their sale.


"This destroys the opportunities for young people to buy a house in the first case as they offer more cash upfront, pricing young people out of the market. And then when they re-sell in a few years time that house in the suburb which was once 1 million is now 1.6 million, which further inhibits other young people from buying a property in that area.
Of course properties increase in value due to other factors, like location, but it’s the flippers and foreign investors who are pushing many young people to the outer limits of the city"

3. Australia’s economic prosperity depends a lot on Business and housing construction. The rules of the game are set by the ATO and our governments. The people (buyers) who participate in the game are not “wankers” as you call them, but buyers with different motivations. The prices are driven by policy, population growth, immigration, jobs etc., not by Flippers who are doing what the governments expect of them..creating jobs and tax revenue.
4. I can agree with you at least on the foreign buyers creating a problem and the increased states’ stamp duties along with the tougher lending criteria don’t go far enough imo.


what does this have to do with the board? get a thread and sort this drivel out - so I can block it


It has as much to do with the thread as your stupid remark.
 
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517878) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517675) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517639) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517498) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517369) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517154) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517105) said:
Maybe he was bored?

A lot of people reassessing their personal situation relevant to employment and lifestyle as this Covid-19 spread continues.


me included

I know its a slight deviation from the thread topic, but can I share an interesting stat from core logic? 25% of home buyers are investors who live in their new purchase while renovating, then after a year or two sell or lease to tenants. Sure, there has always been this sort of activity in the res property market but not at this level. I know a couple who have been doing this for 20 years, however, more recently quit their jobs to devote more of their time to this lucrative "hobby."

It's wankers like that that mean young families can't afford to buy a house

Lol..How do you draw that conclusion? Are you saying if they didn’t improve res properties it wouldn’t increase their value? Or because they could own 2 or 3 at the same time there is a short supply?
I guess it’s the BJ prophecy? Always someone else’s fault. People have no influence over their own goals because of other people creating problems for them?
Maybe you’re right.

Pretty obvious, but i can spell it out for you.

A young family may have a max budget of 1 million to buy a house in sydney. Can't possibly go higher, and whenthey buy they're moving in to live, raise their family, and maybe do renos at some point in time down the track. Flippers might offer 1.1million for the same property, knowing they'll recoup their higher expenditure by doing the place up, and sell for 1.5-1.6 million a few years later.
This destroys the opportunities for young people to buy a house in the first case as they offer more cash upfront, pricing young people out of the market. And then when they re-sell in a few years time that house in the suburb which was once 1 million is now 1.6 million, which further inhibits other young people from buying a property in that area.

Of course properties increase in value due to other factors, like location, but it's the flippers and foreign investors who are pushing many young people to the outer limits of the city

Why is this a bad thing?
 
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518282) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518278) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517903) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517878) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517675) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517639) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517498) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517369) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517154) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517105) said:
Maybe he was bored?

A lot of people reassessing their personal situation relevant to employment and lifestyle as this Covid-19 spread continues.


me included

I know its a slight deviation from the thread topic, but can I share an interesting stat from core logic? 25% of home buyers are investors who live in their new purchase while renovating, then after a year or two sell or lease to tenants. Sure, there has always been this sort of activity in the res property market but not at this level. I know a couple who have been doing this for 20 years, however, more recently quit their jobs to devote more of their time to this lucrative "hobby."

It's wankers like that that mean young families can't afford to buy a house

Lol..How do you draw that conclusion? Are you saying if they didn’t improve res properties it wouldn’t increase their value? Or because they could own 2 or 3 at the same time there is a short supply?
I guess it’s the BJ prophecy? Always someone else’s fault. People have no influence over their own goals because of other people creating problems for them?
Maybe you’re right.



"A young family may have a max budget of 1 million to buy a house in sydney. Can’t possibly go higher, and whenthey buy they’re moving in to live, raise their family, and maybe do renos at some point in time down the track. Flippers might offer 1.1million for the same property, knowing they’ll recoup their higher expenditure by doing the place up, and sell for 1.5-1.6 million a few years later."

There are two flaws in your assumptions..
1. You are assuming that the “young family” are always competing with the wealthier “Flipper.” This can only be possible on 25% or less of occasions, because that is the number of possible “Flippers” identified by Core Logic.
2. The average home turnover is 7 years, this includes all homes including your “young family” who have possibly renovated and increased the value before their sale.


"This destroys the opportunities for young people to buy a house in the first case as they offer more cash upfront, pricing young people out of the market. And then when they re-sell in a few years time that house in the suburb which was once 1 million is now 1.6 million, which further inhibits other young people from buying a property in that area.
Of course properties increase in value due to other factors, like location, but it’s the flippers and foreign investors who are pushing many young people to the outer limits of the city"

3. Australia’s economic prosperity depends a lot on Business and housing construction. The rules of the game are set by the ATO and our governments. The people (buyers) who participate in the game are not “wankers” as you call them, but buyers with different motivations. The prices are driven by policy, population growth, immigration, jobs etc., not by Flippers who are doing what the governments expect of them..creating jobs and tax revenue.
4. I can agree with you at least on the foreign buyers creating a problem and the increased states’ stamp duties along with the tougher lending criteria don’t go far enough imo.


what does this have to do with the board? get a thread and sort this drivel out - so I can block it


It has as much to do with the thread as your stupid remark.

LOL. literally.

Now you have set me straight, which board member can I blame or is it all of them?
 
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518291) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518282) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518278) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517903) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517878) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517675) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517639) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517498) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517369) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517154) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517105) said:
Maybe he was bored?

A lot of people reassessing their personal situation relevant to employment and lifestyle as this Covid-19 spread continues.


me included

I know its a slight deviation from the thread topic, but can I share an interesting stat from core logic? 25% of home buyers are investors who live in their new purchase while renovating, then after a year or two sell or lease to tenants. Sure, there has always been this sort of activity in the res property market but not at this level. I know a couple who have been doing this for 20 years, however, more recently quit their jobs to devote more of their time to this lucrative "hobby."

It's wankers like that that mean young families can't afford to buy a house

Lol..How do you draw that conclusion? Are you saying if they didn’t improve res properties it wouldn’t increase their value? Or because they could own 2 or 3 at the same time there is a short supply?
I guess it’s the BJ prophecy? Always someone else’s fault. People have no influence over their own goals because of other people creating problems for them?
Maybe you’re right.



"A young family may have a max budget of 1 million to buy a house in sydney. Can’t possibly go higher, and whenthey buy they’re moving in to live, raise their family, and maybe do renos at some point in time down the track. Flippers might offer 1.1million for the same property, knowing they’ll recoup their higher expenditure by doing the place up, and sell for 1.5-1.6 million a few years later."

There are two flaws in your assumptions..
1. You are assuming that the “young family” are always competing with the wealthier “Flipper.” This can only be possible on 25% or less of occasions, because that is the number of possible “Flippers” identified by Core Logic.
2. The average home turnover is 7 years, this includes all homes including your “young family” who have possibly renovated and increased the value before their sale.


"This destroys the opportunities for young people to buy a house in the first case as they offer more cash upfront, pricing young people out of the market. And then when they re-sell in a few years time that house in the suburb which was once 1 million is now 1.6 million, which further inhibits other young people from buying a property in that area.
Of course properties increase in value due to other factors, like location, but it’s the flippers and foreign investors who are pushing many young people to the outer limits of the city"

3. Australia’s economic prosperity depends a lot on Business and housing construction. The rules of the game are set by the ATO and our governments. The people (buyers) who participate in the game are not “wankers” as you call them, but buyers with different motivations. The prices are driven by policy, population growth, immigration, jobs etc., not by Flippers who are doing what the governments expect of them..creating jobs and tax revenue.
4. I can agree with you at least on the foreign buyers creating a problem and the increased states’ stamp duties along with the tougher lending criteria don’t go far enough imo.


what does this have to do with the board? get a thread and sort this drivel out - so I can block it


It has as much to do with the thread as your stupid remark.

LOL. literally.

Now you have set me straight, which board member can I blame or is it all of them?

dodgey wigs ,loud mouth lawyers,think of any1 else
 
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518291) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518282) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518278) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517903) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517878) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517675) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517639) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517498) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517369) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517154) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517105) said:
Maybe he was bored?

A lot of people reassessing their personal situation relevant to employment and lifestyle as this Covid-19 spread continues.


me included

I know its a slight deviation from the thread topic, but can I share an interesting stat from core logic? 25% of home buyers are investors who live in their new purchase while renovating, then after a year or two sell or lease to tenants. Sure, there has always been this sort of activity in the res property market but not at this level. I know a couple who have been doing this for 20 years, however, more recently quit their jobs to devote more of their time to this lucrative "hobby."

It's wankers like that that mean young families can't afford to buy a house

Lol..How do you draw that conclusion? Are you saying if they didn’t improve res properties it wouldn’t increase their value? Or because they could own 2 or 3 at the same time there is a short supply?
I guess it’s the BJ prophecy? Always someone else’s fault. People have no influence over their own goals because of other people creating problems for them?
Maybe you’re right.



"A young family may have a max budget of 1 million to buy a house in sydney. Can’t possibly go higher, and whenthey buy they’re moving in to live, raise their family, and maybe do renos at some point in time down the track. Flippers might offer 1.1million for the same property, knowing they’ll recoup their higher expenditure by doing the place up, and sell for 1.5-1.6 million a few years later."

There are two flaws in your assumptions..
1. You are assuming that the “young family” are always competing with the wealthier “Flipper.” This can only be possible on 25% or less of occasions, because that is the number of possible “Flippers” identified by Core Logic.
2. The average home turnover is 7 years, this includes all homes including your “young family” who have possibly renovated and increased the value before their sale.


"This destroys the opportunities for young people to buy a house in the first case as they offer more cash upfront, pricing young people out of the market. And then when they re-sell in a few years time that house in the suburb which was once 1 million is now 1.6 million, which further inhibits other young people from buying a property in that area.
Of course properties increase in value due to other factors, like location, but it’s the flippers and foreign investors who are pushing many young people to the outer limits of the city"

3. Australia’s economic prosperity depends a lot on Business and housing construction. The rules of the game are set by the ATO and our governments. The people (buyers) who participate in the game are not “wankers” as you call them, but buyers with different motivations. The prices are driven by policy, population growth, immigration, jobs etc., not by Flippers who are doing what the governments expect of them..creating jobs and tax revenue.
4. I can agree with you at least on the foreign buyers creating a problem and the increased states’ stamp duties along with the tougher lending criteria don’t go far enough imo.


what does this have to do with the board? get a thread and sort this drivel out - so I can block it


It has as much to do with the thread as your stupid remark.

LOL. literally.

Now you have set me straight, which board member can I blame or is it all of them?


Some posters always go too far to find out how far they can go. LOL I can see where the boundaries are quite clearly thank you. But don’t let me stop you LOL
 
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518305) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518291) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518282) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518278) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517903) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517878) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517675) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517639) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517498) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517369) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517154) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517105) said:
Maybe he was bored?

A lot of people reassessing their personal situation relevant to employment and lifestyle as this Covid-19 spread continues.


me included

I know its a slight deviation from the thread topic, but can I share an interesting stat from core logic? 25% of home buyers are investors who live in their new purchase while renovating, then after a year or two sell or lease to tenants. Sure, there has always been this sort of activity in the res property market but not at this level. I know a couple who have been doing this for 20 years, however, more recently quit their jobs to devote more of their time to this lucrative "hobby."

It's wankers like that that mean young families can't afford to buy a house

Lol..How do you draw that conclusion? Are you saying if they didn’t improve res properties it wouldn’t increase their value? Or because they could own 2 or 3 at the same time there is a short supply?
I guess it’s the BJ prophecy? Always someone else’s fault. People have no influence over their own goals because of other people creating problems for them?
Maybe you’re right.



"A young family may have a max budget of 1 million to buy a house in sydney. Can’t possibly go higher, and whenthey buy they’re moving in to live, raise their family, and maybe do renos at some point in time down the track. Flippers might offer 1.1million for the same property, knowing they’ll recoup their higher expenditure by doing the place up, and sell for 1.5-1.6 million a few years later."

There are two flaws in your assumptions..
1. You are assuming that the “young family” are always competing with the wealthier “Flipper.” This can only be possible on 25% or less of occasions, because that is the number of possible “Flippers” identified by Core Logic.
2. The average home turnover is 7 years, this includes all homes including your “young family” who have possibly renovated and increased the value before their sale.


"This destroys the opportunities for young people to buy a house in the first case as they offer more cash upfront, pricing young people out of the market. And then when they re-sell in a few years time that house in the suburb which was once 1 million is now 1.6 million, which further inhibits other young people from buying a property in that area.
Of course properties increase in value due to other factors, like location, but it’s the flippers and foreign investors who are pushing many young people to the outer limits of the city"

3. Australia’s economic prosperity depends a lot on Business and housing construction. The rules of the game are set by the ATO and our governments. The people (buyers) who participate in the game are not “wankers” as you call them, but buyers with different motivations. The prices are driven by policy, population growth, immigration, jobs etc., not by Flippers who are doing what the governments expect of them..creating jobs and tax revenue.
4. I can agree with you at least on the foreign buyers creating a problem and the increased states’ stamp duties along with the tougher lending criteria don’t go far enough imo.


what does this have to do with the board? get a thread and sort this drivel out - so I can block it


It has as much to do with the thread as your stupid remark.

LOL. literally.

Now you have set me straight, which board member can I blame or is it all of them?


Some posters always go too far to find out how far they can go. LOL I can see where the boundaries are quite clearly thank you. But don’t let me stop you LOL


did you just laugh at your own jokes?
 
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518549) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518305) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518291) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518282) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1518278) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517903) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517878) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517675) said:
@balmain-boy said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517639) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517498) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517369) said:
@twentyforty said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517154) said:
@the_third said in [The Wests Tigers Board](/post/1517105) said:
Maybe he was bored?

A lot of people reassessing their personal situation relevant to employment and lifestyle as this Covid-19 spread continues.


me included

I know its a slight deviation from the thread topic, but can I share an interesting stat from core logic? 25% of home buyers are investors who live in their new purchase while renovating, then after a year or two sell or lease to tenants. Sure, there has always been this sort of activity in the res property market but not at this level. I know a couple who have been doing this for 20 years, however, more recently quit their jobs to devote more of their time to this lucrative "hobby."

It's wankers like that that mean young families can't afford to buy a house

Lol..How do you draw that conclusion? Are you saying if they didn’t improve res properties it wouldn’t increase their value? Or because they could own 2 or 3 at the same time there is a short supply?
I guess it’s the BJ prophecy? Always someone else’s fault. People have no influence over their own goals because of other people creating problems for them?
Maybe you’re right.



"A young family may have a max budget of 1 million to buy a house in sydney. Can’t possibly go higher, and whenthey buy they’re moving in to live, raise their family, and maybe do renos at some point in time down the track. Flippers might offer 1.1million for the same property, knowing they’ll recoup their higher expenditure by doing the place up, and sell for 1.5-1.6 million a few years later."

There are two flaws in your assumptions..
1. You are assuming that the “young family” are always competing with the wealthier “Flipper.” This can only be possible on 25% or less of occasions, because that is the number of possible “Flippers” identified by Core Logic.
2. The average home turnover is 7 years, this includes all homes including your “young family” who have possibly renovated and increased the value before their sale.


"This destroys the opportunities for young people to buy a house in the first case as they offer more cash upfront, pricing young people out of the market. And then when they re-sell in a few years time that house in the suburb which was once 1 million is now 1.6 million, which further inhibits other young people from buying a property in that area.
Of course properties increase in value due to other factors, like location, but it’s the flippers and foreign investors who are pushing many young people to the outer limits of the city"

3. Australia’s economic prosperity depends a lot on Business and housing construction. The rules of the game are set by the ATO and our governments. The people (buyers) who participate in the game are not “wankers” as you call them, but buyers with different motivations. The prices are driven by policy, population growth, immigration, jobs etc., not by Flippers who are doing what the governments expect of them..creating jobs and tax revenue.
4. I can agree with you at least on the foreign buyers creating a problem and the increased states’ stamp duties along with the tougher lending criteria don’t go far enough imo.


what does this have to do with the board? get a thread and sort this drivel out - so I can block it


It has as much to do with the thread as your stupid remark.

LOL. literally.

Now you have set me straight, which board member can I blame or is it all of them?


Some posters always go too far to find out how far they can go. LOL I can see where the boundaries are quite clearly thank you. But don’t let me stop you LOL


did you just laugh at your own jokes?


A bad habit, often laughing too hard to get the joke out.
 
We've been a mess for far too long, and yet the board, the people that ultimately approve and determine the direction of the organisation remain the same.

We have 20k members, thousands of whom are on here. We need our voice to be heard, sign this petition to send a message that we the paying members demand change, starting at the top.


It's clear Madge needs to go, but the clowns that appointed him, also appointed Taylor, Potter and oversaw the sacking of Sheens originally. Why are they largely left unscathed after a decade of failure? Their decisions have us where we are

Enough is enough, we need new blood, new ideas and a new direction before we determine who our next head coach should be.
 
We've been a mess for far too long, and yet the board, the people that ultimately approve and determine the direction of the organisation remain the same.

We have 20k members, thousands of whom are on here. We need our voice to be heard, sign this petition to send a message that we the paying members demand change, starting at the top.


It's clear Madge needs to go, but the clowns that appointed him, also appointed Taylor, Potter and oversaw the sacking of Sheens originally. Why are they largely left unscathed after a decade of failure? Their decisions have us where we are

Enough is enough, we need new blood, new ideas and a new direction before we determine who our next head coach should be.
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome is what makes this club and it’s fans insane
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top