I would love Burton - as a centre.
Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion
- Thread starter MacDougall
- Start date
earl
Well-known member
I'm pretty confident you are correct. Their salaries now are basically completely irrelevant. It's the role you give them, the coach and culture of the team plus and most importantly the money they earn on their next contract.
Madden, Brooks, AD and Hastings are all good players. They are all capable of playing a key role in a lot of NRL teams.
I can't believe they aren't on the radar of heaps of other teams. The Dophins in my opinion would be nuts not to go hard after Madden.
To me the question is do we just keep 2 out of the 4 of them ? If that is the decision where do we play Doueihi or Brooks because Hastings to me gets the 7.
earl
Well-known member
I'd love him as a 6. I think he has to play in the halves. He has one of the best kicking games in the comp, he can ball play plus he can make a bust and support players up the middle.
If I was playing fantasy footy it's between Burton and AD. I think Burton might be better. I think I'd rather move AD to centre than Burton if we had them both.
weststigerman
Well-known member
Watch the 45th minute and you’ll feel better about it.
He played well last night but just like Kelma, still has lapses in defence.
Tiger_Fanatic3
Well-known member
Where did you hear that ?
TSP
Well-known member
Yep, There’s some outstanding indigenous talent in the game.
Tiger_Fanatic3
Well-known member
Are you sure Ron Griffin even exists ?
Or are you referring to the character on family guy 😂
Not at minimum wage, but certainty not at the overs we are paying Brooks.
It's ROD, ROD, ROD, ROD
Bloody speed typing lol
He statistically takes on the line about half as muck as Brooks, and breaks less tackles. He’s nowhere near the threat running the ball Brooks is.
If you’re going to make an argument for him at least argue something that’s close to being true 🤷♂️
Doesn’t matter man, there’s blokes here that will swear black and blue that absolutely anyone is better than Brooks…
Wounded_magpie
Well-known member
Phew ; I rate Ben Gardner . I see Ben as succession to Madge
Masterton
Well-known member
Until now I couldn't say I was unhappy losing Garner. In his first game in the 2nd row with Jacko at half, and he was used like a pick-axe at the line. I'm curious to see if that's as effective against good teams.
I know, and they are entitled to their opinion. I’m just trying to provide some balance to the argument. If Brooks put in the performance Madden did last night, which was ok, they’d all be crapping on about how he did nothing other than 1 chip and chase.
I don’t care either way, I just want to see Wests Tigers win and I don’t think Madden gives us a better chance to do that at this stage.
earl
Well-known member
We aren't going to pay him overs. It's not going to work like that. We are going to have to pick them and pay market rate.
I'd prefer Brooks over Madden because Brooks is from what I've seen the better overall player and he fits better with Hastings than Madden does.
I see the situation as a no brainer. Hastings is up against Madden and Hastings is the guy we have to pick.
Brooks is up against AD as the 6 but you can move AD elsewhere. You might also be able to move Brooks elsewhere.
Madden wants a first grade spot and we can't offer that unless we get injuries.
TSP
Well-known member
Just on Brooks, he’s ok but on the balance, let’s think coin as well and while he’s above factory, I don’t think he’s Marquee.
Im not blaming him or a single unkind word, he’s just got the run of the market.
Also, he hasn’t had the best squad with him at all times.
Hastings on the other hand, well, he’s aspiring Marquee, can be quiet, but at other times, he’s simply massive, dominant and a real handful.
Without any intentional harm to Brooksy, if we get a better option, I don’t think there’s too much left in the tank. But I’m neutral on an official level. I’d be more willing if he could find his way down to about 500k.
Also, out of sight is out of mind, subject to the to the usual injury worries and his orientation back into the game, people forget just how good AD is.
Plus as I understand it, he’s coming back during the injury siege when about the quarter of the NRL are wiped out or laid up. So great timing to return mid season.
On their day, Hastings, Brooks, AD, Nado etc in the same backline would destroy most sides, all that we could want.
Plus paps is killing it for the eels. The upgraded pack is going to plan.
Exciting days to come, we’ve been patient, show us the love fellas!
Im not blaming him or a single unkind word, he’s just got the run of the market.
Also, he hasn’t had the best squad with him at all times.
Hastings on the other hand, well, he’s aspiring Marquee, can be quiet, but at other times, he’s simply massive, dominant and a real handful.
Without any intentional harm to Brooksy, if we get a better option, I don’t think there’s too much left in the tank. But I’m neutral on an official level. I’d be more willing if he could find his way down to about 500k.
Also, out of sight is out of mind, subject to the to the usual injury worries and his orientation back into the game, people forget just how good AD is.
Plus as I understand it, he’s coming back during the injury siege when about the quarter of the NRL are wiped out or laid up. So great timing to return mid season.
On their day, Hastings, Brooks, AD, Nado etc in the same backline would destroy most sides, all that we could want.
Plus paps is killing it for the eels. The upgraded pack is going to plan.
Exciting days to come, we’ve been patient, show us the love fellas!
Last edited:
