hobbo1
Well-known member
Then why reply ?I don’t really care to argue over things that happened 5+ years ago.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then why reply ?I don’t really care to argue over things that happened 5+ years ago.
Missed some of it but my take was that the main reasons for why now, is that current coaches available may not be by next year and also that when there are so many of our players off contract (this year) it allows the new coach not to be hamstrung by the same challenges (or excuses) as past coaches to build their own roster from the get go.Wish he got a few more weeks, team selected if fit with the addition of AD and Roberts in 17 would've been what he wanted. There were good signs.
Can only imagine they wanted to give him the chance to land NZ job as a sop to his genuine commitment and loyalty.
Whoever they land better be good and be able to bring across some big names.
He must have made a mistake and jagged it.Nah,
Think buzz just got one right.
The law of averages meant he was gunna get one right eventually.
how good was that, he does not cop crap Sheensy, he turned into an attack dog, was awesome to see, i think even Kenty was suprised by his comeback to him.Great to see Tim Sheens give it to Paul Kent tonight. Kent reckons we didn't do anything after last years review, Sheens corrected him by saying wrong! We got pathways sorted, got new assistant coaches in, I've come in to help....
Kenty in the background nodding head 🤣
Did he go into detail about how the pathways is sorted?Great to see Tim Sheens give it to Paul Kent tonight. Kent reckons we didn't do anything after last years review, Sheens corrected him by saying wrong! We got pathways sorted, got new assistant coaches in, I've come in to help....
Kenty in the background nodding head 🤣
Because it's their job.If the head of football doesn’t care why would the players?
Not far off.I think the decision was made during the first review but the Board could not entice the coach it wanted. Sheens was brought onboard and head hunted the candidate the Board wanted.
Sheens on the attack but I don’t like his reasoning.
For example lot of players are signed for next year and beyond and the new coach is stuck with them. To suggest that a new coach will have a full say and not use Madge’s players as an excuse for failure, it’s laughable.
Sheens is talking shit - that is why he is defensive. As a coach that has been sacked he knows better than anyone the way this was handled was appalling and he is been thrown in the deep end to mop it up. He was stuttering for words on the news grab for good reason.
The "pathways" garb is the new go to. I don't believe for one minute that Maguire would not promote talent that was good enough.
He didn't have the support of the board and they panicked when Brown walked that they might miss out on the next sucker they pretend to back - that's what I think and I won't be convinced of other wise.