The Sin Bin

tig_prmz

Well-known member
I only just finished watching the highlights, but that sin bin was surely an awful call.. might be ok with a Penalty but he's hit him before the ball has made contact with the boot. Not reckless or late.

And since they score off the same play, doesn't that negate the offence any way? If someone commits a professional foul and they end up scoring, they don't still get sin binned.

Wonder how the NRL explains this one
 
Still searching. NRL saying they misread the rules. ARL saying "nothing we can do" and Nonutssley on Monday morning: "consistent not fair…”
 
I feel we are same as lasst season , no rub of the green Mosses on brooks clear penalty but we get nothing , The sin bin was probably harsh as it was not late just no arm wrap , and Parra laid all over us and nothing again , and I’m not sure if it’s my eyes but Mahonnys for Parra 80 % of his passes are forward one he passed on this side of the line but the player catches it a mtr on the other side of it , where are the lines people
 
I didn't think it was a shoulder charge. More of a shirt front at worst. With a push. Possibly a penalty if a try wasn't scored. Definitely not a sin bin.
Ruined what could have been a close game.
If it wasn't the tigers it's play on.
 
End of the day Mata made a rookie mistake and didn’t go in with arms. He was always going to be in significant trouble especially with an Oscar award winner in Moses on the other side of it.

Shoulder charge on a ball kicker is a sin bin most games these days.
Sin bin every day of the week
 
Back
Top