pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
We know halves are worth more than the range you have nominated.If he's renegotiating to stay for $4-500K a year for the next 3 years, go nuts. That's good value for him.
Anything above that is not remunerative of
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We know halves are worth more than the range you have nominated.If he's renegotiating to stay for $4-500K a year for the next 3 years, go nuts. That's good value for him.
Anything above that is not remunerative of
the club take some of that million and spread it out over 3 years so his new contract is 750k or 800k a year over 3 years it evens out the cap and you get a discount of 170k so it basically becomes instead of 800k it is 630kThere has been suggestions Sheens is working on a Chris Lawrence type deal with Brooks which would be a great outcome for both parties. Brooks contract reflects market forces at the time which resulted in Moses, Tedesco and Woods departing.
When a player’s contract comes up for discussion the “loyalty” tag becomes a burden for him and an opportunity for the club to lowball. Nofa, Teddy, Brooks, Woods all discard the tag when it comes to negotiating a new deal. Brooks recently stated he would be thinking about himself this time.No doubt Brooks had offers from other clubs. The club paid what was required to retain him (as was determined by the market). Just because you don't agree with it doesn't make the club's decision incorrect. Do the names of Tedesco, Moses and Woods sound familiar?
It's essentially paying Klemmer 1.1m. We simply can't do it.
Slowest halves combo in the league.If Hastings and Doueihi are looking to be the future of the club - They got some work to do....
The comment you made that "Brooks recently stated he would be thinking about himself this time" suggests he did display loyalty to the club by staying. The rumours of a Chris Lawrence type deal also requires a degree of loyalty.When a player’s contract comes up for discussion the “loyalty” tag becomes a burden for him and an opportunity for the club to lowball. Nofa, Teddy, Brooks, Woods all discard the tag when it comes to negotiating a new deal. Brooks recently stated he would be thinking about himself this time.
You’re right about one thing haha, my opinion doesn’t make it right, but I don’t know what that has to do with the point in discussion?
Not even the Tigers are that stupid.Good laugh from the Newcastle forum
Wests tigers will pay 800k for brooks to play at Newcastle
These blokes must go to the Grogfield school of salary cap management
I'm happy for both to move on in 24.Slowest halves combo in the league.
these are the rumours floating around on other forums, just like they were last yearNot even the Tigers are that stupid.
Your point?The comment you made that "Brooks recently stated he would be thinking about himself this time" suggests he did display loyalty to the club by staying. The rumours of a Chris Lawrence type deal also requires a degree of loyalty.
HaYour point?
Think of the output Klemmer could give us for $1.1m, opposed to what Brooks produces for 8-900k.It's essentially paying Klemmer 1.1m. We simply can't do it.
IF he wants to go good luck to him playing outside ponga better than Adam so good luck to himBrooks brigade in full force this morning.
Hopefully IF he goes to Newcastle, yas will admit you were wrong all along.
2012 NYC player of the year !!!Think of the output Klemmer could give us for $1.1m, opposed to what Brooks produces for 8-900k.
Adam is Dally M... oh wait2012 NYC player of the year !!!
Can't take that accomplishment away from him.