Bus 2 Terrigal
Well-known member
I’d prefer a house at Wamberal 🤔Would you prefer Klemmer or Brooks for 1.1?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’d prefer a house at Wamberal 🤔Would you prefer Klemmer or Brooks for 1.1?
No brainer, we need a prop in the klem mould, he would be someone who would be a great partner for Stefano.Love it, get it done tigers.
Need more $$ than that these daysI’d prefer a house at Wamberal 🤔
No doubt Brooks had offers from other clubs. The club paid what was required to retain him (as was determined by the market). Just because you don't agree with it doesn't make the club's decision incorrect. Do the names of Tedesco, Moses and Woods sound familiar?What absolute rubbish.
You can’t buy loyalty, so why pay for it? Why place a monetary value on it?
Whatever figure you quote is distorted as some of that figure is money owing to him from previous year(s). This means his pa figure is lower and therefore context is important.
That’s why I think Brooks is not going anywhere.So if Madden gone , Brooks gone , Jacko as lock ( Sheens preference)
Douehi where ?
What is our halves combination ?
As usual the departure lounge is full but the arrivals gate is quiet
Brooks should sit tight wait and see which one of Moses and or Dylan Brown might leave parramatta, he would he much better placed going there ein 2024 than NewcastleNo doubt Brooks had offers from other clubs. The club paid what was required to retain him (as was determined by the market). Just because you don't agree with it doesn't make the club's decision incorrect. Do the names of Tedesco, Moses and Woods sound familiar?
When it comes to spinning the narrative to suit the agenda it means everything. That is money owed to him.If we are paying him $1m out of the cap this year, that is still $1m whether it's backloaded or otherwise.
Context means jackshit there.
The Knights need someone in 23. Our club has reaffirmed he is here in 23.Brooks should sit tight wait and see which one of Moses and or Dylan Brown might leave parramatta, he would he much better placed going there ein 2024 than Newcastle
When it comes to spinning the narrative to suit the agenda it means everything. That is money owed to him.
$1.1 mill is earmarked for Brooks next year regardless..its a sunk cost.
We either use the majority of thos $$ on Klemmer....or stick with Brooks at full freight and repeat recent years dismal performances(appreciate other factors involved)
Desperately need forward leadership and go forward,so Klemmer better bang for WTs buck in immediate future,particularly if we cant attract any other sizable props like Leuinu
Hastings can sort out playmaking and kicking much better than Brooks from whatever position he plays
Must be true if twitter said itOn the rumour re: Brooks to Newcastle for $300K, we have got some quality players coming on board for 2023. IMO we're still short by 3 players on what we need to be a lock for the 8, but since there's been some decent signings, I'd like to see us not sabotage our season before it's started by paying Brooks upwards of $600K to play somewhere else. If we were footing the $300K for him to go to Newcastle, that's a much better outcome.
If we're getting next to nix for him to play somewhere else, it's not worth it especially if the destination club is apparently "desperate" for him. If it goes ahead like that anyone involved in signing that deal off needs to be sacked on the spot.
Must be true if twitter said it
There has been suggestions Sheens is working on a Chris Lawrence type deal with Brooks which would be a great outcome for both parties. Brooks' contract reflects market forces at the time which resulted in Moses, Tedesco and Woods departing.It is money owed to him, but it's still $1m out of the cap. Whether its backloaded or not, that's the apparent impact he has on our cap for 2023. It doesn't matter if he goes elsewhere, he's not getting a cent less than what he is owed, it just depends who pays what, and FTR I just posted if the deal is anywhere near to what has been reported, that's an abhorrent decision and everyone involved in signing that off ought to be dismissed immediately.
There has been suggestions Sheens is working on a Chris Lawrence type deal with Brooks which would be a great outcome for both parties. Brooks contract reflects market forces at the time which resulted in Moses, Tedesco and Woods departing.
The knights desperately need a halfback and have their sights set on BrooksOn the rumour re: Brooks to Newcastle for $300K, we have got some quality players coming on board for 2023. IMO we're still short by 3 players on what we need to be a lock for the 8, but since there's been some decent signings, I'd like to see us not sabotage our season before it's started by paying Brooks upwards of $600K to play somewhere else. If we were footing the $300K for him to go to Newcastle, that's a much better outcome.
If we're getting next to nix for him to play somewhere else, it's not worth it especially if the destination club is apparently "desperate" for him. If it goes ahead like that anyone involved in signing that deal off needs to be sacked on the spot.