Halbrowne61
Well-known member
Why do you keep putting AD at 7. I would imagine it would be better, if we are in that situation, which I hope we’re not, to try DL at 7 and AD at 6. Better balance imo.Hey Demps tell me how you really feel.🤣
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do you keep putting AD at 7. I would imagine it would be better, if we are in that situation, which I hope we’re not, to try DL at 7 and AD at 6. Better balance imo.Hey Demps tell me how you really feel.🤣
7 is mostly played on the right side which is AD preferred sideWhy do you keep putting AD at 7. I would imagine it would be better, if we are in that situation, which I hope we’re not, to try DL at 7 and AD at 6. Better balance imo.
Exactly so why not move him back to 7 if we have no other options. Certainly not Dooway.The quarterback role is Hastings, they’ve trialled that play style out this year and beat 2 top 4 teams
So clearly works
Because him playing that role in the middle allows AD and whoever plays left to play out wider which has proven to make it easier to score pointsExactly so why not move him back to 7 if we have no other options. Certainly not Dooway.
According to me..?According to @Demps if you sign in 2024 you can be released in 2023
so if Hastings signs with dogs or whoever in 2024 he can go in 2023 apparently
Disagree , imo both should be able to play both sides.7 is mostly played on the right side which is AD preferred side
Suits Laurie aswell at 6 since he’s preferred side is left
Hastings hasn't requested 3 releases....
He's openly stated he wants to stay at the Tigers and be apart of what we're building.
What I'm saying.... is, imo... Brooks is as good as gone.
I'm basing this on the information we've been told and confirmed by @THE_POM ... can you think the media backlash around us denying a player a release two years in a row when he's desperately wanting out? All we heard on 360 this year was how Brooks and the club need to part ways and its best for all parties involved, especially Brooks. Think of the mental anguish if would put one through being forced to play on at a club he clearly does not want to be at? Think of how that would effect his performances? (Lolllll) is that the narrative Sheens wants in the media?
Sometimes it's easier and for the best to just let something go, no matter how much you (or Sheens)loves it, especially if it doesn't love you back.
I’m just comparing the preferred sides around the comp look at all the best 7s, Cleary, Moses , Fogarty , Reynolds all prefer right sideDisagree , imo both should be able to play both sides.
Can’t he play that as 7 ?Because him playing that role in the middle allows AD and whoever plays left to play out wider which has proven to make it easier to score points
Brooks isn't going to give you any options when he's pulling on a red & blue jersey...I think most of agree he's gone.
But we want to know who the new 7 will be. Don't think the new 7 is currently in our squad.
Current squad variations would be
1 Staines
6 AD
7 Hastings
1 Staines
6 Laurie
7 Hastings
1 Staines
6 AD
7 Brooks
1 Laurie
6 AD
7 Hastings
1 Staines
6 Laurie
7brooks
1staines
6 Hastings
7 brooks
Club have to figure out best combo. Brooks gives us more options.
agree we don't want a tanking situation on our hands but not sure Sheens is keen with just AD Laurie as halves 23. Obviously Sheens coming back from u.k. might change his mind at present if a release was asked it was 2 days agoHastings hasn't requested 3 releases....
He's openly stated he wants to stay at the Tigers and be apart of what we're building.
What I'm saying.... is, imo... Brooks is as good as gone.
I'm basing this on the information we've been told and confirmed by @THE_POM ... can you think the media backlash around us denying a player a release two years in a row when he's desperately wanting out? All we heard on 360 this year was how Brooks and the club need to part ways and its best for all parties involved, especially Brooks. Think of the mental anguish if would put one through being forced to play on at a club he clearly does not want to be at? Think of how that would effect his performances? (Lolllll) is that the narrative Sheens wants in the media?
Sometimes it's easier and for the best to just let something go, no matter how much you (or Sheens)loves it, especially if it doesn't love you back.
Brooks isn't going to give you any options when he's pulling on a red & blue jersey...
The blue print is set.
Brooks is about to get his release.
@Jedi_Tiger owes me a kebab.
All I will say is look at the way Cleary plays both sides, that’s basically what I’m talking about.I’m just comparing the preferred sides around the comp look at all the best 7s, Cleary, Moses , Fogarty , Reynolds all prefer right side
Same as 6 Munster plays left when 6, Dylan brown, Cody walker.
List goes on
This has been a long time coming...agree we don't want a tanking situation on our hands but not sure Sheens is keen with just AD Laurie as halves 23. Obviously Sheens coming back from u.k. might change his mind at present if a release was asked it was 2 days ago
Yeah I know that but I’m just putting numbers on preferred sides, AD and Laurie can both play either side as they’ve both played fullbackAll I will say is look at the way Cleary plays both sides, that’s basically what I’m talking about.
Can attack or defend left or right but will say he has Yeoh playing a pivotal role to enable that.
We need to replace Brooks tho or have lack of options.