Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here

[Winston Churchill]

Disagree. Of course there was evidence - her testimony is evidence. If it wasn't for her mental state he'd be up again next year. As it stands, I believe they could refile charges at any point.

Testimony / eye witness is the weakest evidence there is in a court of law. Peoples memories are not reliable or dependable at all. No 'good' evidence would be more correct.

 

[earl]

Disagree. Of course there was evidence - her testimony is evidence. If it wasn't for her mental state he'd be up again next year. As it stands, I believe they could refile charges at any point.

Good post. I disagree. I don't believe you can just say someone did something and then lock them up. I believe society must have a higher burden of proof than this.

I don't think they'll refile charges at any point.

 

[Yossarian]

Good post. I disagree. I don't believe you can just say someone did something and then lock them up. I believe society must have a higher burden of proof than this.

I don't think they'll refile charges at any point.

In a lot of cases like this, supporting evidence is hard to comeby. I have a hard time believing she's made this up and subsequently put herself through all this. His statements surrounding why he was there don't put him in a good light.

In my personal opinion, having some experience in how the DPP approaches such things, there was more than enough to proceed to trial. I thought it was a better case than the Hayne prosecution.

It probably won't be refiled but I wouldn't rule it out.

 

[Winston Churchill]

In a lot of cases like this, supporting evidence is hard to comeby. I have a hard time believing she's made this up and subsequently put herself through all this. His statements surrounding why he was there don't put him in a good light.

In my personal opinion, having some experience in how the DPP approaches such things, there was more than enough to proceed to trial. I thought it was a better case than the Hayne prosecution.

It probably won't be refiled but I wouldn't rule it out.

Its happened before

'believe all women' was a lefty trope for years while it suited their narrative, until a certain New York Governor was implicated. The whole lefty double standard thing

 

[Tucker]

I sometimes still fall into the trap of thinking they want honest discourse but you discover very very quickly they don't and you find yourself saying yet again "damn, I did it again, gave them a chance, fool on me"

Yes the divide of ideas is wider than ever.

 

[InBenjiWeTrust]

We learn something every day, our friends on the "left" have introduced a few new definitions
of the terms THEY use:
So according to the "left" (at least on this forum) any person who disagrees with them on the
AGW, abortion or experimental injections is by default "extreme right winger, cooker etc." .
They extend this with "any person on the right is evil", or at least "not a good person"??
Also, ANY person THEY classify as the "left" is by default a good, or at least not evil person.
With this "newspeak" they are forced to lie, or at least to rewrite the history.
E.g. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot (the people that killed millions of people) because they are on the "left", must be the good people?? So comrade Theophanous becomes a good person, because he is on the 'left"??
Would a "reasonable person" do that?
For any "reasonable person" this shall not make any sense, as the "left" and "right" are terms
used in a different context, to generalise (according to Marx) - "left" are people who are against "capitalism", and the "right", people who prefer "capitalism". For any "reasonable person" this is not even tangentially related to the AGW, abortion, experimental injections, hate speech etc.
Even funnier, the "left" traditionally insisted on the free, uncensored speech, but now they just rewrite the history, they now use Orwell's books as the "Instruction Manuals" and not as a warning!
The "left" use the old dehumanising method for their "enemies" (e.g. the method used by another inconvenient lefty - Hitler, he proclaimed Jews "non human"), they make anyone who disagrees with them "non human", "basket of deplorables", "enemies of the people", they are made the worst people, so they must be "cancelled", if not sent to gulag, or even better eliminated, as suggested by at least one person on this forum.😥

 

[TrueTiger]

Yes the divide of ideas is wider than ever.

I find this thread quite interesting with interesting people having input...
I cant and wont defend people who constantly bellittle others who have a varying opinion on matters...
Just for an example.I consider that Trump had the American economy progressing well,inflation was low,unemployment amongst the black Americans was low, the border was secure and there wasnt any wars under his leadership...
In contrast the Biden admin is doing far more poorly on all fronts as it is atm..
So in my view,Trump was doing really well,I have stated many times,I would support any leader who does the right thing by the country and people of that nation...I wasnt impressed with Scomo but Iam quite prepared to support Albo if he does the right thing by Australia and the Australian people...I have learnt a long time ago that when we vote we make our own decision at the time on who has the best policies and interest for the country,not because grandad,dad or mum always voted x so do I...

 

[earl]

I have a hard time believing she's made this up and subsequently put herself through all this.

The problem is mate that it happens. The bad thing about the case is that if she was raped he gets away free but I can't justify allowing cases like this to even get to court.

 

[earl]

I cant and wont defend people who constantly bellittle others who have a varying opinion on matters...

We should be clear on this. There have been an abundance of ad-hominen attacks and it's from the special people. The same ones who believe in stuff that is clearly false.

 

[earl]

So in my view,Trump was doing really well

He was and is completely and utterly incompetent. He was an utter failure and more than likely the worst president of all time.

You are entitled to your opinion but Trumpism has been an absolute failure and thankfully people appear to be waking up to this reality.

 

[Tucker]

We should be clear on this. There have been an abundance of ad-hominen attacks and it's from the special people. The same ones who believe in stuff that is clearly false.

LOL go back through your own posts and make this claim with a straight face.

 

[earl]

He is a simple minded creature as evidenced by his racism and lack of concern for people who were struggling through the pandemic as alluded to earlier.

Just to prove the point with facts. Those facts suck don't they.

 

[earl]

LOL go back through your own posts and make this claim with a straight face.

You my friend are a hypocrite.

 

[Yossarian]

We learn something every day, our friends on the "left" have introduced a few new definitions
of the terms THEY use:
So according to the "left" (at least on this forum) any person who disagrees with them on the
AGW, abortion or experimental injections is by default "extreme right winger, cooker etc." .
They extend this with "any person on the right is evil", or at least "not a good person"??
Also, ANY person THEY classify as the "left" is by default a good, or at least not evil person.
With this "newspeak" they are forced to lie, or at least to rewrite the history.
E.g. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot (the people that killed millions of people) because they are on the "left", must be the good people?? So comrade Theophanous becomes a good person, because he is on the 'left"??
Would a "reasonable person" do that?
For any "reasonable person" this shall not make any sense, as the "left" and "right" are terms
used in a different context, to generalise (according to Marx) - "left" are people who are against "capitalism", and the "right", people who prefer "capitalism". For any "reasonable person" this is not even tangentially related to the AGW, abortion, experimental injections, hate speech etc.
Even funnier, the "left" traditionally insisted on the free, uncensored speech, but now they just rewrite the history, they now use Orwell's books as the "Instruction Manuals" and not as a warning!
The "left" use the old dehumanising method for their "enemies" (e.g. the method used by another inconvenient lefty - Hitler, he proclaimed Jews "non human"), they make anyone who disagrees with them "non human", "basket of deplorables", "enemies of the people", they are made the worst people, so they must be "cancelled", if not sent to gulag, or even better eliminated, as suggested by at least one person on this forum.😥

The person trying to recast Hitler as a "lefty" is complaining about rewriting history? This all comes across as a "no true Scotsman" kind of argument.

I'm not going to speak for others who consider themselves progressive or of the left. This concept of the left being a homogeneous collective with no deviation isn't helpful or accurate. For the record I'm anti-communist and the people you refer to above, particularly Saloth Sar, are terrible people who deserve condemnation and scorn as do the many brutal right-wing dictators in South America and elsewhere. This shouldn't be a contest as to whether Papa Doc is better or worse than Ceausescu.

I've never suggested everyone who may be considered right of centre are inherently bad people. Nor would I say e everyone even moderately left are good people. There are things I believe in and that informs my perceptions.

Touching briefly on the abortion discussion on here. I personally thought most people on both sides of the issue were respectful and considerate.

 

[Yossarian]

Just put the trolls on ignore. There's some respectful intelligent posters on either side of politics on here. Then there's the shitposter cohort...

You my friend are a hypocrite.

 

[Yossarian]

The problem is mate that it happens. The bad thing about the case is that if she was raped he gets away free but I can't justify allowing cases like this to even get to court.

I get that but the % would be low. Obviously there's got to be more than an allegation but ultimately it's up to a jury to determine fact.

 

[earl]

Just put the trolls on ignore. There's some respectful intelligent posters on either side of politics on here. Then there's the shitposter cohort...

I do put them on ignore but I give them some time. It's hard to have conversations because of the extremists.

There are some good conversations to be had but these guys live for it.

 

[Yossarian]

I do put them on ignore but I give them some time. It's hard to have conversations because of the extremists.

There are some good conversations to be had but these guys live for it.

And that's the issue. I've tried to engage in rational debate but they're not interested. It's not even the viewpoints that bother me, it's the constant childish trolling and name-calling.

 

[InBenjiWeTrust]

The person trying to recast Hitler as a "lefty" is complaining about rewriting history? This all comes across as a "no true Scotsman" kind of argument.

I'm not going to speak for others who consider themselves progressive or of the left. This concept of the left being a homogeneous collective with no deviation isn't helpful or accurate. For the record I'm anti-communist and the people you refer to above, particularly Saloth Sar, are terrible people who deserve condemnation and scorn as do the many brutal right-wing dictators in South America and elsewhere. This shouldn't be a contest as to whether Papa Doc is better or worse than Ceausescu.

I've never suggested everyone who may be considered right of centre are inherently bad people. Nor would I say e everyone even moderately left are good people. There are things I believe in and that informs my perceptions.

Touching briefly on the abortion discussion on here. I personally thought most people on both sides of the issue were respectful and considerate.

Were the Nazis Socialists?

What’s the difference between National Socialists and every other kind of socialist?

www.britannica.com

 

[earl]

I get that but the % would be low. Obviously there's got to be more than an allegation but ultimately it's up to a jury to determine fact.

I think the judicial system should stop these cases going further. I understand what you are stating but I can't see this case sticking even if he was found guilty.

He would appeal.

I expect the legal system to be above politics. I accept this isn't the case but I think we should take a step back and reflect on the role of the legal system.