Adam Doueihi #227

WesternSuburbsBoy said:
Sure no worries
AD Linebreaks 2021: 0.5 per game
Brooks 2021: 0.3 per game

AD 2020: 0.3
Brooks 2020: 0.2

AD 2022: 0.3
Brooks 2022: 0.2

Well would you look at that lol
Click to expand...

My take is the argument about who is better between Brooks and Doueihi is over. I think the question is more about where do you play Doueihi and how much is he worth ?

Next season to me it's a no brainer in that you play him at 6. Then we reassess what happens. The problem is that he is after too much money and if he plays well he might just leave the following season.
 
Earl said:
My take is the argument about who is better between Brooks and Doueihi is over. I think the question is more about where do you play Doueihi and how much is he worth ?

Next season to me it's a no brainer in that you play him at 6. Then we reassess what happens. The problem is that he is after too much money and if he plays well he might just leave the following season.
Click to expand...
I've said this before & I'll say it again. If AD is demanding that sort of money (pure speculation) than he can leave I couldn't care less. But it's quite clear he's a better 5/8 than Brooks & Brooks is not a good halfback either... over the years we've seen so many changes just to accomodate Brooks & yet he's always the one being spared the blame which bemuses me. Someone here keeps bringing up that he won a Dally M when he won it 4 seasons ago & has done nothing since whilst being the highest paid player at the club.

The only thing Brooks does better than AD is defend, but do you sign up a half to defend or attack? It's quite clear who the better attacker out of the two is. Oh wait sorry... Brooks has speed !!!!
 
Batmans Parents said:
So that makes it okay to tank a game? Interesting…
He’s not the best option, he’s the only option. There’s a pretty clear distinction between the two but I wouldn’t expect you or the rest of the cult to understand that.
You mean the Douhie who has easily outplayed your family friend every time he’s been healthy (including in the halves)?
I get you want to defend you friend but your delusion regarding Brooks abilities is not of this world.
Click to expand...
I your opinion, Again if Sheens and Marshall wanted to get rid of Brooks they would have, fact is they have not.
Brooks behind this pack of forwards and Sheens as coach will do very well
Yes I mean the Douhie who as yet is not signed for 2024 currently
Yes Brooks is not signed either for 2024 and may not be either, so again we will wait and see. Do think a restructured Brooks deal will happen and he will finish as a one club player
 
Last edited:
WesternSuburbsBoy said:
I've said this before & I'll say it again. If AD is demanding that sort of money (pure speculation) than he can leave I couldn't care less. But it's quite clear he's a better 5/8 than Brooks & Brooks is not a good halfback either... over the years we've seen so many changes just to accomodate Brooks & yet he's always the one being spared the blame which bemuses me. Someone here keeps bringing up that he won a Dally M when he won it 4 seasons ago & has done nothing since whilst being the highest paid player at the club.

The only thing Brooks does better than AD is defend, but do you sign up a half to defend or attack? It's quite clear who the better attacker out of the two is. Oh wait sorry... Brooks has speed !!!!
Click to expand...
I know you hate the fact he won a Dally M halfback of the year but ignoring the fact he has previously doesn't change the fact he has won it..
 
Earl said:
I'm laughing at this one because I thought it was a load of trollop. I argued that Hastings was bought to replace Brooks at 7.

Just to be fair to us Sheens was stating that we were going to play Hastings as a ball playing lock and I assume Brooks and Doueihi as wider running halves. I assume because Hastings was going to be the organizer.
Click to expand...
“Assume”, makes an ASS of U and ME.😂
 
WesternSuburbsBoy said:
Since Brooks 'Strength' is his running game I decided to look at another stat which is tackle busts.

AD TB's per game 2020: 3.6
Brooks: 1.9

AD 2021: 2.6
Brooks: 2.3

AD 2022: 2.9
Brooks 1.3

Well again would you look at that.
Click to expand...

Brooks fans ducking for cover 😂

Like I and others have said, let’s see in 2023. He’ll likely get a whole off-season to train at 5/8 for the first time and will be well removed from the second ACL surgery. While recovery is usually 9 months, it generally takes a minimum of 12 months to start to feel truly comfortable and trust the knee.
 
No offence but in defence to both AD and Brooks, it wouldn't be too uncharacteristic for an underperforming club to produce underperforming players. With poor recruitment and retention decisions causing poor roster composition - and player development.
The last time we had anything close to a decent rebuild (culture and leadership wise), Brooks won Dally M halfback of the year. Our last junior players to reach great heights, were those from Sheens' previous era (succession plan).
IMO our current rebuild is probably the best I've seen and despite the club's history with Brooks or Sheens, the club are a lot more prepared and strategic than they've ever been.

We have to wait and see how everything clicks and no individual player would be responsible for it, if the outcome was unsuccessful.
Feel Korisau's and Klemmer's leadership will be pivotal to the form of both players and the team's success.
 
Jedi_Tiger said:
I your opinion, Again if Sheens and Marshall wanted to get rid of Brooks they would have, fact is they have not.
Brooks behind this pack of forwards and Sheens as coach will do very well
Yes I mean the Douhie who as yet is not signed for 2024 currently
Yes Brooks is not signed either for 2024 and may not be either, so again we will wait and see. Do think a restructured Brooks deal will happen and he will finish as a one club player
Click to expand...
Sheens has stated that he wants Brooks to stay on but on a reduced deal, similar to another WTs' stalwart, Chris Lawrence. I guess this means Sheens is not a supporter of WTs.😂

www.foxsports.com.au

Tim Sheens wants Brooks back at Tigers... but would ‘prefer it to be at less money’

Tim Sheens wants Brooks back at Tigers... but would ‘prefer it to be at less money’
www.foxsports.com.au www.foxsports.com.au
 
Lauren said:
No offence but in defence to both AD and Brooks, it wouldn't be too uncharacteristic for an underperforming club to produce underperforming players. With poor recruitment and retention decisions causing poor roster composition - and player development.
The last time we had anything close to a decent rebuild (culture and leadership wise), Brooks won Dally M halfback of the year. Our last junior players to reach great heights, were those from Sheens' previous era (succession plan).
IMO our current rebuild is probably the best I've seen and despite the club's history with Brooks or Sheens, the club are a lot more prepared and strategic than they've ever been.

We have to wait and see how everything clicks and no individual player would be responsible for it, if the outcome was unsuccessful.
Feel Korisau's and Klemmer's leadership will be pivotal to the form of both players and the team's success.
Click to expand...
I don’t think we’ve seen the cap in such great shape? The increase of $1m plus is also a very timely fillip.
 
Other than a few tidbits from those on here that almost certainly know more than me on Adam, I have no idea what he and the club are thinking for the coming season, let alone the potential re-signing for the following one/s.

Either way, if he is at the club, we need commitment from both sides to get the best performance in whichever position that may be. Doueihi has developed as a goalkicker and has a great floating bomb when used sporadically, which we also need without an alternative.

Don't see him in the halves long term, whether at WT or elsewhere, but seems to be a primary option with the lack of candidates at this point for 2023.
 
pawsandclaws1 said:
Sheens has stated that he wants Brooks to stay on but on a reduced deal, similar to another WTs' stalwart, Chris Lawrence. I guess this means Sheens is not a supporter of WTs.😂

www.foxsports.com.au

Tim Sheens wants Brooks back at Tigers... but would ‘prefer it to be at less money’

Tim Sheens wants Brooks back at Tigers... but would ‘prefer it to be at less money’
www.foxsports.com.au www.foxsports.com.au
Click to expand...

Ah yes. Here comes Sheens personal bootlicker, little paws, to spam the same articles over and over because he’s incapable of posting an opinion that doesn’t elicit laughter or eye rolls from people who don’t worship at the alter of Sheens.

Here’s a newsflash, paws; spamming articles, followed by deflection and running doesn’t make you look informed or intelligent. It makes you look like a blind sheep but then again, that’s no surprise to anyone on here who has had the misfortune of reading your dribble.

Run along now. I’m sure Sheens has a pair of shoes that require your attention.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Total: 413 (members: 18, guests: 395)
Forever online: Tigergran, Geo
Back
Top