Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

tigermate said:
yes they brought us those players - but what were the terms?

You provided facts without specifics or detail.

Would you be happy to pay $1m a year for Nathan Brown? I assume not.

So the terms of the deal are important not necessarily the signing which is what makes a good negotiator.

If we did sign Bateman for 4 yrs that’s a joke - like re-signing Naden for 3 yrs when he had no other options (same mistakes we made with Reynolds’s and Mbye for 4 yrs)… even Klemmer should’ve been a 2yr + 1yr option for the money we are paying but hey Justin, Lee and Sheens are gods.

But in the end - hope you’re right and I’m wrong.

Proof will be in the Xmas pudding next year.
Click to expand...
The club has done well to get these players when a new team has entered the comp. Terms are confidential like any employment contract. You only need to ask yourself is the roster stronger than last season. The answer is a big yes!
 
jadtiger said:
So Sheens got us Gildart and Peachey?That i will believe
Click to expand...
Peach was Madge’s desperate rotten fruit signature. I still remember seeing the stupid grin and him trying to tell everyone what a great signing it was. I knew then Madge was not gunna gets us anyone descent.
I reckon Sheens would have had some input on Dilfart coz he was in England. Also I reckon Sheens would have had input on the others. That’s just what I reckon though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
pawsandclaws1 said:
Maguire is gone and rightfully so. That is the past and it is time to move on.
Click to expand...
Just remember one thing that justifies Madge getting the sack ,
1) every year our defence got worse , we conceded more points every year he was there .
2) I think i am correct our attack also got worse every year as well .
So really how could u keep a coach who can’t sure up ur defence and can’t get ur team to score .
For me his major problem was his constant one out football, one off the ruck made it very easy for the defence to close us down .
 
pawsandclaws1 said:
I don't believe Sheens would care if you attribute those players to him. The club has done extremely well to recruit the players it has to date with the possibility of more to come.
Click to expand...
Those guys barely saw the year out.

Hope they learn from these mistake like signings.

Onward and upwards.
💯🔥
 
pawsandclaws1 said:
Here I was naively believing football matters came under the umbrella of football operations.
Click to expand...
bptiger 0 said:
Just remember one thing that justifies Madge getting the sack ,
1) every year our defence got worse , we conceded more points every year he was there .
2) I think i am correct our attack also got worse every year as well .
So really how could u keep a coach who can’t sure up ur defence and can’t get ur team to score .
For me his major problem was his constant one out football, one off the ruck made it very easy for the defence to close us down .
Click to expand...
Madge got the sack because he didn't win enough games with a dud roster. You can hold him accountable for his part, but the biggest problem for this club and the reason why we are like a revolving door for players and coaches is the lack of quality with the roster compared to other teams.
The representative season has demonstrated that for ages - we are regularly close to full strength aside from injury while other teams are testing their depth.
On paper we have recruited well with one out standing buy, but plenty also bought into the Packerlino and Reynolds turning around our fortunes too. If some are reserving judgement till they start performing it's for good reason.
 
Telltails said:
Madge got the sack because he didn't win enough games with a dud roster. You can hold him accountable for his part, but the biggest problem for this club and the reason why we are like a revolving door for players and coaches is the lack of quality with the roster compared to other teams.
The representative season has demonstrated that for ages - we are regularly close to full strength aside from injury while other teams are testing their depth.
On paper we have recruited well with one out standing buy, but plenty also bought into the Packerlino and Reynolds turning around our fortunes too. If some are reserving judgement till they start performing it's for good reason.
Click to expand...
The highlighted text is all you needed to write.
 
jadtiger said:
You distorted the facts and added them to your argument as you also named arguably the best 2 players who were signed by Madge and put them at the front of the new players for next year to make your opinions about Sheens Benji and Robbie look stronger.Merry xmas
Click to expand...
As I said before. Those two players were signed AFTER Sheens arrived. Madge without Sheens was unable to sign anyone
 
bptiger 0 said:
Just remember one thing that justifies Madge getting the sack ,
1) every year our defence got worse , we conceded more points every year he was there .
2) I think i am correct our attack also got worse every year as well .
So really how could u keep a coach who can’t sure up ur defence and can’t get ur team to score .
For me his major problem was his constant one out football, one off the ruck made it very easy for the defence to close us down .
Click to expand...

With Hastings controlling the play we had our 2nd worst attacking year, worst win loss record and worst defensive year.

Our attack scored 150 less points for the season with our attack being controlled by Hastings than the season before under Brooks, even 2020 when we played less games we scored 90 more points.

People see what they want of course but I just don’t see how Hastings would’ve been more valuable to the side over Brooks if we want an attacking style game plan.

Its all mute anyway Hastings is gone, Brooks/AD/Laurie who knows and well we have a totally different dynamic team wise for 23.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 529 (members: 12, guests: 517)
Back
Top