pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
See my reply below.This has nothing to do with my thoughts on Brooks/AD, I just think that Sheens should pick the best available player regardless of what Moses thinks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See my reply below.This has nothing to do with my thoughts on Brooks/AD, I just think that Sheens should pick the best available player regardless of what Moses thinks.
I worded that slightly wrong, it was along the lines of strengthen the pack and the quality backs will become available. Sheens obviously did that and it worked two fold as Moses had more than capable players in his stable klemmer and Bateman so for Isaac it was a win win reallyYou would hope that we are trying to strengthen our pack because we want to, not because Moses' manager wants us to.
Perhaps they already have. You're a very reasonable poster but go and read Doueihi's comments again. It may be just my slant but he seems halfway out the door,Did I say that? the point i'm trying to make is they are the ones who should decide who plays alongside Moses not Moses himself.
All this talk about who pairs Moses watch him not even come 🤣 🤣 🤣 this smells like Latrell all over again hahahaPerhaps they already have. You're a very reasonable poster but go and read Doueihi's comments again. It may be just my slant but he seems halfway out the door,
Also in regards to this if this is the case it's a poor decision from the club imo again nothing to do with my thoughts on Brooks/AD but both should be afforded the same opportunity to prove themselves to play alongside Moses next year.Perhaps they already have. You're a very reasonable poster but go and read Doueihi's comments again. It may be just my slant but he seems halfway out the door,
My point is the best player should get the chance to play alongside Moses not whoever Moses picks.
We're just supporters. I understand where you are coming from.Also in regards to this if this is the case it's a poor decision from the club imo again nothing to do with my thoughts on Brooks/AD but both should be afforded the same opportunity to prove themselves to play alongside Moses next year.
His new Parramatta contract?Glad Moses contract is for 4 years and not 5, but still pretty meh about the idea.
Decent enough player, still appears to be a down hill skier and I can't get the images of him tanking in his last couple of games for us.
We'll see if he does come here and can change my opinion.
Lol Jedi ... anything to make it easier for Brooks to keep his job.AD would go well back in rugby, he runs well kicks well and defence doesn't matter as much in rah rah. He was a good rugby player and would make the wallabies. He would be the type of steal Eddie Jones would go looking for and he could probably command 800k and above.
Sounds promising, thanks mate for your info, we do appreciate itAgree, but why have a face to face & written contract in play this late.
Yeah, it was badly phrased, as i extended tackling technique into another argument, i apologise.Far out man…
- the post I replied to was calling api the best pound for pound defender in the game?
I can’t contextualise your post to my comment…
you think he will get 800k at the Tigers in 2024 ? I don'tLol Jedi ... anything to make it easier for Brooks to keep his job.
Totally agree, he will be Eddie Jones 1st big? scalp...AD would go well back in rugby, he runs well kicks well and defence doesn't matter as much in rah rah. He was a good rugby player and would make the wallabies. He would be the type of steal Eddie Jones would go looking for and he could probably command 800k and above.
Agree appreciate the info POM 👍Sounds promising, thanks mate for your info, we do appreciate it
He played schoolboy rugby for Australia.you think he will get 800k at the Tigers in 2024 ? I don't
if he is chasing the dollars rugby is a good option
Thanks for the correct update mate much appreciatedThe club is very confident that Moses will be putting pen to paper at this Thursdays meeting.
A 4 year deal worth close to $1.4mill per season (can't confirm but a 5 year may be a mutual option).
All "requirements" per his managements discussions have been met & our offer is better than the Eels.
Since Farnworth has informed other clubs of his intent to stay at Broncos the club has changed focus to Dominic Young, very early talk just gauging his price point.
Daine Laurie is looking likely to take up the current 1 year extension being offered, he wants 2 years or more but club not budging on this.
Talk of Seyfarth looking to move on is true, club happy to keep him for 2023 season but won't stand in his way of long term offer if it comes forward.
Laurie will be fullback round 1, Staines too quiet for Sheens liking & "needs to find his voice" to be any chance of taking the 1 off Laurie, Bula is nipping at their heels but a roster spot would need to be freed for him to play prior to round 10.
Club has also held talk with Fletcher Baker from the Roosters.
Tommy, I think that beanie is a bit too tight. And, you must put your helmet on when you go outside. There’s a good boy.Simple error, was typing quickly and got the order of the two clubs back to front, but I think the meaning from my post is clear nonetheless if one is not trying to nitpick.