LIVE GAME Live Game Discussion, vs Newcastle - Rd 2 *Spoilers*

Live Game Discussion
We can all say plenty of bad things after today's game. Everyone's to blame and equally as bad in a number of different ways. However, Brooks needs to go and before anyone labels me a Brooks hater, I'd rather be labelled a crap halfback hater. All the good teams have a competitive half back and an organiser in the team. We just don't have this and It all starts and ends with the half back. We were a team without a leader or any direction today. GET A GOOD HALFBACK AND WE WIN MORE GAMES, SIMPLE!
 
Funny how this place is…. I’ve said nothing about ppl that say what they want for years, and as soon as I speak up and disagree with “the old crew” I’m called a troll. I guess it doesn’t pay to be civil on here. But you know what… no loss of sleep. Anyway, hopefully the tiger get it together next week. Surely they can’t be that bad 3 weeks in a row! Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
If Hastings was our halfback today we win that game. Brooks was better than AD and had some good moments today but as halfback with the extra man, all that was needed was composure and control from the halfback. Newcastle had it, Tigers were panicked and frantic which stems from Brooks playing that way as half
Ur kidding Hastings is useless just like our playmakers , the only difference is the knights forwards ran into the ball , and they can catch and pass unlike our shit lot .
But don’t go saying Hastings is a brilliant player 🥴
 
Genuine question. Is a CEO ever responsible for team performances? At what point do you start to hold a CEO accountable?
I believe results on the field are part of a CEO’s brief. Pascoe has presided over years and years of poor results. He was also responsible for the Farah salary cap debacle. His one claim to fame was returning the books to the black. I consider that to be one of the easiest jobs a CEO has.
CEOs should be pivotal in driving club culture. In my view our culture is dreadful. We have no heart, no fight, no will to win against the odds. Pascoe has done zilch for our culture.
In my view he should go and go now.
Your views?
Well with WT you don't ever hold the CEO accountable especially in mixed company as they will come at you with an over inflated ego of importance.
 
If Hastings was our halfback today we win that game. Brooks was better than AD and had some good moments today but as halfback with the extra man, all that was needed was composure and control from the halfback. Newcastle had it, Tigers were panicked and frantic which stems from Brooks playing that way as half
If Hastings was our half back today he would have been sent off lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 851
I thought Brooks was our most dangerous player today.
When Brooks runs why isn’t there a player each side of him? Don’t understand why none of our players want to spend the energy to score tries?
Just follow Brooks.
How about he tells them he is going and DEMANDS they be there?
That’s what a good half does.
 
Last edited:
Ur kidding Hastings is useless just like our playmakers , the only difference is the knights forwards ran into the ball , and they can catch and pass unlike our shit lot .
But don’t go saying Hastings is a brilliant player 🥴
When did I say he was brilliant? That's drawing a very long bow. All I said was he played with some calmness and composure and played simple. Which is exactly what we needed
 
Funny how this place is…. I’ve said nothing about ppl that say what they want for years, and as soon as I speak up and disagree with “the old crew” I’m called a troll. I guess it doesn’t pay to be civil on here. But you know what… no loss of sleep. Anyway, hopefully the tiger get it together next week. Surely they can’t be that bad 3 weeks in a row! Lol
It’ll be worse next week and the week after that and the week after that .
 
Why single out Brooks, better than most today. The team was crap today.



I think he played crap like the rest of the team. He did nothing to organise out attack today and anything that looked even remotely (and I use the term very lightly) like an attacking play was lead by AD and he even sucked. Brooks should be organising this team and controlling what we do. He didn't do that and offered nothing more than poor attempts and running through a hole. He deserves to be held to account as a senior player and in the role of halfback too.
 
Genuine question. Is a CEO ever responsible for team performances? At what point do you start to hold a CEO accountable?
I believe results on the field are part of a CEO’s brief. Pascoe has presided over years and years of poor results. He was also responsible for the Farah salary cap debacle. His one claim to fame was returning the books to the black. I consider that to be one of the easiest jobs a CEO has.
CEOs should be pivotal in driving club culture. In my view our culture is dreadful. We have no heart, no fight, no will to win against the odds. Pascoe has done zilch for our culture.
In my view he should go and go now.
Your views?
He should have been held accountable in his second year. Teflon Pascoe.
 
Back
Top