Dennisspicer1
Well-known member
Actually brooksy very late in 2nd half run towards the left wing and created an overlap he had positioned himself where our centre and winger were outside him and in front of brooks there was newcastles centre, so if he draws in there centre offloads to our centre, then he draws there winger, and passes ball to our winger, TRY TIME.We had them on the ropes, but we let them off because we were unable to capitalise on our opportunities. We had Api and Brooks running across field without any runners running off them, either as an option to receive or as a decoy, or a support player. Both Brooks and Api should have been shouting and berating their team mates for not doing this. All it would have taken is a couple of half breaks generated by people running the lines they should have been running, and we would have put 20 more points on the Knights.
Hastings didn't offer much, but he did bark orders and point and tell people what to do. Brooks complete failure to ever do this is why he will never be an NRL standard halfback. He will never be the general, a Hunt, DCE type. He's a sidekick. And we don't need a sidekick.
But our brilliant half Brooks elects a different way, he grubber kicks and the newcastle centre turns and punches the ball dead. We could have won the game right there.
THANKS AGAIN BROOKSY FOR 10 YEARS OF IT.