That’s not a good enough reason to keep him. He has to actually be playing good footy in order to keep him. Why should we keep him when we know what the result will be?don't think they will, think they will re sign him tbh but on much less coin
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s not a good enough reason to keep him. He has to actually be playing good footy in order to keep him. Why should we keep him when we know what the result will be?don't think they will, think they will re sign him tbh but on much less coin
I would say if the club is seriousHave to bring in a new 1,6 and 7 for next year.
Back to back spoons incoming and a guy who's won 2 of his last 24.don't think they will, think they will re sign him tbh but on much less coin
Pascoe out, Sheens interim CEO, bring in a new head coach.
Hasler or anyone with coaching experience available.
Put a call in to Mitch Pearce to take over the half back for the balance of the season.
I think AD unless someone does want him will be kept. Even if its just for depth. We need to go to market and try to bring over a new 1,6 and 7 for 24 if we want to try and have success. Keeping Brooks isn’t the answer.I would say if the club is serious
Brooks doesn't get re signed
Shoop AD wherever you can to get him out too even to the point heavily subsidise his 650k contract to play elsewhere
we extended the other bloke in AD too, the club does some silly things mate. Both should probably go tbhBack to back spoons incoming and a guy who's won 2 of his last 24.
I cannot think of a more stupider thing to do than extend some one who is so out of his depth and simply cannot deliver within his role.
Honestly would not have a problem with that.Imagine if the brought mitchell pearce in effective immediately
Probably wasn’t the smart move but it was only a one year deal. Its 50/50 really. But if they can offload him by all means do it but yeah can’t keep Brooks anymore.we extended the other bloke in AD too, the club does some silly things mate. Both should probably go tbh
Just outta curiosity where do you get your info from? I think you said the same about Ramien coming to us.heard early in the week a swap was brewing with Aiden Seizer and Brooks. Let's see if it has any legs
No, I think we all know now, he must be released. No re-signing, OUT.don't think they will, think they will re sign him tbh but on much less coin
Chuck in Nofo, Talau and Laurie.we extended the other bloke in AD too, the club does some silly things mate. Both should probably go tbh
And we never ever pressure the kickerAnd to add to that why do we not contest any kicks we put up we continually sit back and let opposition bring the ball back , so bloody annoying
That’s not a good enough reason to keep him. He has to actually be playing good footy in order to keep him. Why should we keep him when we know what the result will be?
Again...hate to say this, but if you have ever seen Twal interviewed there just is nothing 'there'.I've always been a Twal supporter but the play when Api ran from dummy half and Twal ran in front of him for 15 metres making Api unable to give him the ball will do me.
Just punt him and give Matamua a run.
Chuck in Nofo, Talau and Laurie.
Let's pro actively try and improve this squad.
Idk with AD. Tonight wasn’t good from him but we really don’t have anyone else to play the spine. If we take Brooks out AD is most likely in the halves. You keep Brooks in he’s either his 6 and Brooks is 7 again. Club needs a whole new spine for 24. Except Api of course.I can't see them keeping him based on performance. AD is lucky he signed an extension but I don't think you play him in the spine again. He is just too slow.
problem is getting blokesChuck in Nofo, Talau and Laurie.
Let's pro actively try and improve this squad.