Ok mate.
Well, yes. Ownership is the issue. A far, far bigger issue than Sheens, Brooks and whoever else below. With the right owners setting performance criteria it should be possible for even Brooks to play a hell of a lot better than he is. You'd think at some point the NRL leadership would say - "Look, your performance is now dragging down the league. Either do something about it or we do something about you". But that's Ideal World thinking. Not reality, I guess.
No. That just doesn't wash. We can argue as much as we like about whether Jackson Hastings deserved to be canned by the Tigers (I think it was a bad decision - but that's just me). But regardless of my feelings - a halfback partnership of Hastings & Tyson Gamble isn't going to win any titles. When the Knights lost Ponga their forwards didn't quit. They upped the ante. Forwards blaming backs for their lack of intensity - no. Just no. How about the forwards do their jobs, stop the Broncos from running unobstructed over the try line so the backs at least have a shot at making the game competitive? Regardless of whether they are good enough - Luke Brooks and AD were not the reason the Tigers lost so badly in Brisbane. The pack quit in the first ten minutes!
I suspect we do get spoken about regularly at NRL HQ.
Or it could be Ian Millward...
He doesn't deserve to if he keeps picking Douehi and Brooks
How do you clean out head office when they're answerable and accountable to nobody?
You couldn't get Haas with the stone tablets he brought down from the Mount.
We can only pray.
Nothing suggests he didn't know what he was in for. He is not delusional. He will stay
It's rank stupidity that they didn't spend it for 2023.
They can’t. That’s the issue. No one wants to join them.
Can he play halfback ?
Sheens would try
It’s pronounced Doulittle. Please say it correctly.
