Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mutual Option can be triggered by either party…I think it’s a mutual option isn’t it? If we are still rooted to the bottom of the ladder I predict he goes to a top line club in search of another ring.
The word to emphasise is ‘hopefully’Believe it….the reason was financial….to hopefully use his funds to buy well in 2024
Nothing reported on any NRL or Super League siteRaiders sign Lachlan Lam in preference to Brooks.
Says it all.
It will continue for another 10 years.😂Fighting over madge is so 2022.
Jock is in the Broncos top 30 squad, nothing will happen.Can anyone tell me what this means can we get madden back
I believe it needs to be triggered by BOTH parties to be effective. Not just one of the parties.Mutual Option can be triggered by either party…
Can’t see us looking to let our captain and best player go.
I believe it needs to be triggered by BOTH parties to be effective. Not just one of the parties.
Interesting. I’m sceptical of that.It doesn’t…
Had it Confirmed by a football manager a couple weeks back…
No disrespect - biggest myth in the game that it needs to be triggered by both. It’s in place to give both parties an even shot at triggering it.
Interesting. I’m sceptical of that.
If it is the case they need to change the name of it as “mutual” means both parties agreeing.
Townsend and Cogger are sub standard…hope you’re all tuned in to watch the Chad?
Currently made to look silly by Peachey and Salmon…
Just my understanding of the language. Possibly from the media but I can’t remember anything specific. I definitely could be wrong.I’ve had it confirmed before - elsewhere…
I just wanted to make sure I had it right…
Everyone focuses on the mutual part forgets the second word - “option”
It means both (mutual) parties have the ‘option’
Not having a shot - but where does your scepticism come from? Your understanding of what it should mean - or something more substantial?
I literally got it from the mouth of a guy who deals in options most days of his job…
It can be triggered by either party…..but both parties need to agree to the decision the other party triggered.I believe it needs to be triggered by BOTH parties to be effective. Not just one of the parties.
I thought cogger was up to itTownsend and Cogger are sub standard…
Nothing reported on any NRL or Super League site
While I object to most of Snidest's comments.You haven’t got a clue.
Research before you engage your brain … if you got one.
They’d be doing that on signing the contract….It can be triggered by either party…..but both parties need to agree to the decision the other party triggered.
Been a whisper around sticky was chasing him for a week or more…Nothing reported on any NRL or Super League site