It's interesting that Gus said last night on 100% Footy that he thinks Bulldogs are 3-4 years behind Tigers in Pathways development. As originally quoted to me by bathursttiger.
I also honestly don't think you need great junior sides across the board, of course though it doesn't hurt, but that having a great SG Ball or Flegg side is only a fraction of the story, if most of those boys don't go on to first grade. In other words the lower grade results are not necessarily an indicator of the quality of candidates coming through that actually will play first grade.
E.g. even within our own juniors, the 2012 and 2013 SG Ball back-to-back premiers, most of them didn't go anywhere near first grade
2012
1 Mason Farrell, 2 Max Dimarco, 3 Leva Li, 4 Nathan Milone, 5 Paul Simona, 6 Mitchell Moses ( C ), 7 Mark Daoud, 8 Leki Taumalolo, 9 Manaia Cherrington, 10 Fosio Tatola, 11 Salesi Funaki (Junior's bro), 12 Daniel Rakvin, 13 Andrew Kazzi, Interchange 14 Jason Vikilani, 15 Rhys Armstrong, 16 Matthew Woods, 17 Lolo Funaki
2013
1. Camden Sutton, 2. Jayden Wheelhouse, 3. Tom Satterthwaite, 4. Jaleel Seve-Derbas, 5. John Tohi, 6. Rhys Armstrong, 7. Jeremy Marshall-King, 8. Fosio Tatola (C), 9. Jack Wheelhouse, 10. Pio Sokobalava, 11. Junior Tatola, 12. Matthew Woods (C), 13. Peter Ta’auso. Int 14. Dwayne Lemafa, 15. Tyler Cassel, 16. Adam Spicer, 17. Josh Camroux
I'm not saying you are wrong, I am just noting that Gould himself says Tigers are ahead in pathways development and commented that Bulldogs should have started the same process 6-7 years ago.
As you have highlighted perfectly even in the best junior sides (winners) most of the players just don't reach the level that people expect