Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

I think you forget that we got punished because it was not declared, not for the deal we decided to do.
No. We were stupid enough to mention it all over the place, we actually declared it to everyone that wanted to listen, except officially to the NRL, and Turd Greenturd decided to treated it fairly if not consistently. 🤣🤣 🤣

Thought what followed was pretty harsh but I am still amazed to this day that Pascoe survived that episode.
 
Croft has get out clauses in his contract that can be evoked every single year if an NRL club comes knocking. that is fact. he's pretty much off contract every year if an NRL side wants to bring him across.

I'm not looking at this with rose coloured glasses because we've been linked with him, but he is an improvement on what we currently have. he is at least a threat from a running standpoint, which Wakeham is most certainly not. his short kicking game is also good enough to apply pressure, and he plays down the right edge for Salford, which is where he would play for us if we end up with Latu.

I agree on your Metcalf take, I'd love him and he wants to play 7, but given he's under contract he might be harder to prise away from his current club than Brodie is.
I wasn't aware of that clause - thanks for pointing it out.

I also understand your perspective here too, it's been born of the situation we're in though. We're almost completely stuck for other options.

Metcalf should be priority 1 in my very humble opinion. He is a footballer. Has a great read for the game and he has developed nicely to force his way into a warriors team, that I think is playing some good eyes up rugby league.

Do you think they're even considering it? Surely all cards are on the table right now.
 
If you spoke up about Brooks being our best and only option you were labelled as a fan boy.

We can't attract a better half than him, there isn't even one on the market. And we're not talking anyone out of a contract, when we can't even talk free agents into joining.

Rookie free agents who are guaranteed an NRL start even.

Absolute madness that we're in this position without a plan.
 
Evidently, so the club cannot adequately support the coaches , or as they call them the footy department. Despite their claims that they do.
It’s nothing to do with club not being able to close a deal or the club culture bull crap.
The simple fact is we haven’t had a team capable of making the 8 for many years and our current roster is far and away the worst in the NRL, players baulk at coming for those reason alone.
It’s a hard task to recruit, but just a matter of being realistic in our targets, looking for players unhappy at their current clubs or ones struggling to get regular if any NRL game time.
If possible to get him even if needing to pay well over his market value, I think a player line Zac Lomax could be worth it as he has a profile as being a fringe rep player and could get the ball rolling for others who are 50/50 to also come on board.
I’ve mentioned his name quite a few times, but I’m certain Adam Clune would be a much better recruit than anyone from the UK Super League and probably better than anyone else on our potential halfback recruit list from the Australia and New Zealand as well.
The amount of points an average NSW Cup team in the Knights have scored when he is their 7 is remarkable and if you watch some of their games and the highlights, he is heavily involved in a very high percentage of their tries scored.
 
If you spoke up about Brooks being our best and only option you were labelled as a fan boy.

We can't attract a better half than him, there isn't even one on the market. And we're not talking anyone out of a contract, when we can't even talk free agents into joining.

Rookie free agents who are guaranteed an NRL start even.

Absolute madness that we're in this position without a plan.
Patience. Seldom found in a woman, never in a man.

Just wait.
 
I thought the Major sponsor can offer up club third party deals to a certain amount.
Prehaps what ever the value is, instead of giving them a deal of $50k in third party deals, they’ve offered them $50k in shares. Could be allowed? Must be if it’s been given the green light.
Issue I have with it all is all third party agreements must be at arms length from the club, as in the club are not to approach any person or sponsor for one. We all know that's not how it works though, the Roosters must just have dumb luck to find one whenever they need one, now with Laundy at the Dogs it's just obvious. In saying that though if the N.R.L aren't going to enforce it good luck to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
Issue I have with it all is all third party agreements must be at arms length from the club, as in the club are not to approach any person or sponsor for one. We all know that's not how it works though, the Roosters must just have dumb luck to find one whenever they need one, now with Laundy at the Dogs it's just obvious. In saying that though if the N.R.L aren't going to enforce it good luck to them.
Not all, there is a certain amount the Major Sponsor can offer as third party off the cap deals. Not sure who much though.
 
Back
Top