PETITION LINK External Review

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not what you posted earlier which prompted my post today

People have a right to know .

Because clearly 1200 signatures is not going to lead to anything.
I personally would like to forward the petition to the NRL, that however hasn't been discussed or planned at this stage.

I hope that is clearer than my previous post.
 
Not defending the administration BAGNF05: Just trying to get answers from the petition leaders before any action takes place.
I reckon before anything like this happens, the leaders would at least have a pretty good idea of the people they would prefer to see installed in place of the current mob.
And I reckon we should be entitled to know who they have in mind before we sign the petition.
Before anybody signs to anything, we should know what the details are, otherwise we are just signing a blank piece of paper.
Letting ourselves get excited by someone saying ' let's get rid of this mob' could lead to more trouble if it's not agreeable to everyone.
There is absolutely no one we have in mind as possible replacements because we don’t know what the review might find. A review could conclude with the reassigning of existing people, or it could be a recommendation of sweeping changes. The main point is, as has been pretty clearly spelled out, that it’s about getting the review actioned and respecting that process.
 
No.

But my feelings are irrelevant regarding the question posed to the organisers of the petition as I'm not organising the petition.

If I was organising a petition people have a right to know my motives and
possible direction.
What they are pushing for is an independent review.
How do their motives affect this? They won’t be running it..or have anything to do with it.
 
There is absolutely no one we

Do you get to decide?
have in mind as possible replacements because we don’t know what the review might find. A review could conclude with the reassigning of existing people, or it could be a recommendation of sweeping changes. The main point is, as has been pretty clearly spelled out, that it’s about getting the review actioned and respecting that process.
What about other fans and who and what they have in mind?

Sounds like you are bigger than the club.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BZN
Maybe we have the wrong kind of petition going.

Were asking the board to do something and establish a review.

Instead, we should tap the person we want to do the review!
Petition Cooper Cronk and as fans ask him to review our team.
If not Cooper, Luke Lewis or James Maloney. I know Sterlo and Matty Johns would have the Ego's to do it.

Then we yell at the board to allow the review to happen. Lets start controlling this process.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top