Lee & JP finally lose the confidence of the Board??

[cochise]

Which people?

I guess the people involved in the change.

From the media it doesn't appear that Lee is handling this process very well, but that is just from. What I have read reported.

 

[Magpie_Magic]

It was a group interview, not just me.

What was the preslection process.

Most season ticket holders weren't informed.

 

[Magpie_Magic]

I guess the people involved in the change.

From the media it doesn't appear that Lee is handling this process very well, but that is just from. What I have read reported.

Are the petitioners and perhaps the sponsors of some petitioners of those involved?

 

[cochise]

What was the preslection process.

Most season ticket holders weren't informed.

I'm not conducting the review, I don't know how the people conducting selected the people involved. Maybe you could contact them and ask how they decided who they would interview.

 

[Merlot]

I love Magpies and NEVER get attacked by the actual birds - but somehow Wests Magpies supporters have no frontal cortex or sense of reason...

peck ya eyes out , thats a bloody broad brush.lol

 

[cochise]

Are the petitioners and perhaps the sponsors of some petitioners of those involved?

What petitioners are you referring to as I have no idea what you are asking?

 

[Telltails]

You and I rarely agree but it is factual.

Pretty sure Lee patted himself on the back for getting the deal done over a golf game in one of the many media articles.

 

[Snidest 0]

What was the preslection process.

Most season ticket holders weren't informed.

I was not involved in the review - and am certainly not part of any inner sanctum

 

[Magpie_Magic]

I'm not conducting the review, I don't know how the people conducting selected the people involved. Maybe you could contact them and ask how they decided who they would interview.

Well to be honest if you were just hoping to launch a process whereby an independent review was commissioned you should have declined to impart your views to the reviewers.

Otherwise it can be seen you were using it as a platform to promote your views which will differ in many respects to petitioners and non petitioners.

 

[Snidest 0]

What petitioners are you referring to as I have no idea what you are asking?

I didn't sign the online petition as I believed it was another exercise in futility - but congrats on getting some leverage with it!

 

[Magpie_Magic]

I was not involved in the review - and am certainly not part of any inner sanctum

Still haven't blocked me lol.

Online addiction.

 

[Magpie_Magic]

What petitioners are you referring to as I have no idea what you are asking?

Are some of the petitioners and perhaps sponsors of some part of the change?

 

[Snidest 0]

peck ya eyes out , thats a bloody broad brush.lol

You're right sir!

My apologies!



I'm better than that!

 

[Merlot]

I guess the people involved in the change.

From the media it doesn't appear that Lee is handling this process very well, but that is just from. What I have read reported.

from what is reported of Lee lately is what i think a lot of the nay sayers were worried about with the petition .that Lee will throw his toys out of the cot and blow the lot to kingdom come,thats fine it brings change.

 

[cochise]

Well to be honest if you were just hoping to launch a process whereby an independent review was commissioned you should have declined to impart your views to the reviewers.

Otherwise it can be seen you were using it as a platform to promote your views which will differ in many respects to petitioners and non petitioners.

I considered that but decided I had just as much right to be heard as anyone else. You mighn't agree and I'm ok with that but that was my decision.

 

[cochise]

I didn't sign the online petition as I believed it was another exercise in futility - but congrats on getting some leverage with it!

It achieved more than I probably thought it would to be honest.

 

[cochise]

Are some of the petitioners and perhaps sponsors of some part of the change?

Not to my knowledge mate. I don't know the backgrounds of everyone that signed the petition though.

 

[Magpie_Magic]

I considered that but decided I had just as much right to be heard as anyone else. You mighn't agree and I'm ok with that but that was my decision.

Well,

You should have mentioned that to the prospective petitioners, that you were going to act as a kind of elected spokesman.

 

[Merlot]

You're right sir!

My apologies!

View attachment 7101

I'm better than that!

its yet another conspiracy

 

[Snidest 0]

Still haven't blocked me lol.

Online addiction.