No evidently Tigers only keen if available 24 due to salary cap space available to afford overs in 24 and 25 and the hope that 26 onwards some of the youth will be ready and have a strong team to be integrated into.Is it 3 years conditional to starting in 24? And 2 years if from 25 or just 2 years conditional to starting in 24?
The initial offer (which was one of those informal getting a 3rd party to reach out offers rather than a formal contract offer) was would he be keen for 24 and 25 on well over a mil. He essentially responded with yes he is interested but tee it up with black money (before the announcement of him actually signing with them).
Then when it got put to his manager they advised he see what Penrith is offering. They want to leverage the Penrith offer for a 3rd year as the Penrith offer is essentially an extra year given their 2 year offer was for 25 and 26.
He does not know if Tigers will go for a 3 year contract. He speculates that a 3rd year player option at a lower rate may appease all parties but that was his input not what he has heard may happen. However he also said no way Penrith will release him early anyways and Tigers wont be putting up the big money for a contract starting in 25.
I then asked him if Penrith would release him early as part of a trade. He said possible but trades take ages to negotiate and that is the lots of negotiating between clubs I was referring to.
Same bloke that gave me the Brooks low balled and won't be re-signing news a few weeks before the media got it.