I gave you 4 players with similar problems.
You chose to ignore that to call your belief a 'fact'.
What is 'consistently'? Is that measurable? How has he ever maintained a First Grade career as long as he has with these failings? How have 3 coaches, not rookies- PREMIERSHIP WINNERS- selected him MORE OFTEN THAN NOT (facts- go look it up) while he carries these horrible flaws?
You asked to consider context. I asked to consider the defensive effort of the men inside him. Ignored. Because of 'facts'.
I asked if you knew Nofa's defensive instructions, because you 'know stuff'. Turns out, you can recite how slide & up & in defence works. Awesome. But, what were Nofa's instructions? Was he advised that, if he thought an intercept was on, to go for it? Was he instructed to attempt to knock the ball down when in a 2-1 situation? You know, facts. Which you ignored in order to name call.
If you could show me the actual facts, not beliefs, in your argument (remembering that someone also pointed out that there isn't a disproportionate amount of points scored down Nofa's wing to any other, but I digress) that'd be great.