WT Ownership, The Board & Senior Management - MEGA Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
So according to this article, Pascoe stays? What's with this comment:

'Hagipantelis is expected to go as part of sweeping changes at the board level, although he will likely be given the chance to apply again for a place on the board.'

This isn't musical chairs. I understand they want Lee's money, but if you break up, you don't make up.
 
Agree Tucker our board seem too narcissistic and devoid of any self awareness enough to understand they are the cause of our problems. But iv got my fingers crossed tuesday night is the beginning of a new chapter in Tiger town.

Many of us live in hope just as you do.The club needs to get it right and this should be their best chance
 
So according to this article, Pascoe stays? What's with this comment:

'Hagipantelis is expected to go as part of sweeping changes at the board level, although he will likely be given the chance to apply again for a place on the board.'

This isn't musical chairs. I understand they want Lee's money, but if you break up, you don't make up.
I suspect Pascoe stays but a proper board demanding excellence would soon make his life a living hell.
 
The Wests Tigers’ boardroom drama is finally expected to be resolved on Tuesday night as Holman Barnes Group directors prepare to face their own mortality at their final board meeting of the year.
The Tigers’ majority owners have had a snapshot of the independent review into the club’s governance but are yet to put the report’s recommendations into action.
That time has now arrived as the club faces a defining moment in their history.
The Holman Barnes Group, responding to the protests of club supporters, courageously backed a review into the club.
It will all be for nothing if they now ignore the recommendations, which are likely to see the board significantly overhauled as the Tigers look to form a more rounded group of directors capable of comparing favourably with the game’s elite clubs.
The expectation is that the review will recommend they start again.

For that to happen, Holman Barnes Group directors will need to vote for their own demise.
The alternative would be to dig in their heels and face the wrath of Tigers fans. Most interest will surround the future of chair Lee Hagipantelis and chief executive Justin Pascoe.
Hagipantelis is expected to go as part of sweeping changes at board level, although he will likely be given the chance to apply again for a place on the board.
Pascoe’s future is likely to be for another day.
The review, conducted by former NRL chief financial officer Tony Crawford and managing director of Cooperage Capital Pty Ltd, Gary Barnier, was aimed at governance rather than club operations and there is a view that Pascoe should be given the chance to show what he can do without board interference.
The other concern is that boardroom ructions threaten to become a distraction to coach Benji Marshall as he attempts to reshape his squad and make them more competitive heading into the 2024 season, hence the desire to resolve the issue before the new year.

The club is knee-deep in talks with Penrith superstar Jarome Luai and Warriors prop Addin Fonua-Blake, Marshall having personally led negotiations with the pair.
Marshall is also attempting to clean out some of the players who haven’t performed in recent years, led by winger David Nofoaluma.

The Samoan international has two years remaining on a contract that is due to pay him about $500,000 a season but Marshall and the club have made it clear that he is free to leave.
In a sign of how far his stocks have slid, the Tigers haven’t been able to generate any interest in Nofoaluma and he recently sat out training in protest at his treatment.
While the Tigers need the cap space to sign Luai and Fonua-Blake, it is understood the stance on Nofoaluma is purely performance related – he has struggled to keep his place in the NRL side in recent seasons.
I hope some things do eventuate.
Finally be good to see fresh faces in the HBG along with fresh ideas.
 
A CEO taking an organisation backwards normally gets moved on fairly quickly in the real world.
Correct, so with that in mind, you’d have to think WT is not your typical organisation. Something stuck in my memory when Madge was in his 2nd year which I couldn’t understand. As Lee explain following a Madge review, ‘the board wants more control over footy dept. operational procedures and hiring of staff.’
Why would they want that?
 
Correct, so with that in mind, you’d have to think WT is not your typical organisation. Something stuck in my memory when Madge was in his 2nd year which I couldn’t understand. As Lee explain following a Madge review, ‘the board wants more control over footy dept. operational procedures and hiring of staff.’
Why would they want that?

To stroke their ego's as they have to feel importent even though they are impotent
 
Wouldnt surprise me if they wait until next year before we hear anything - meetings on tues and everything shuts down for xmas a bit over a week later.....and then it will be just more piss poor lip service weve been used to for years

Please prove me wrong WTs
They all clung on to get the xmas bonus and another free piss up no doubt, hopefully they don’t have designs on doing the same in 2024, useless twats.
 
Lee's situation is interesting. If he's removed as Chairman or as a director as a consequence of this review, why would he not just withdraw his sponsorship as he leaves the building.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BZN
Lee's situation is interesting. If he's removed as Chairman or as a director as a consequence of this review, why would he not just withdraw his sponsorship as he leaves the building.
He professes to be a fan, not just a tacky lawyer trying to recruit knockabouts who need a compensation payment.
 
He professes to be a fan, not just a tacky lawyer trying to recruit knockabouts who need a compensation payment.
He’s a fan, a die hard. Cant knock him for passion. They need better capability I have no issue with a successful head of a legal firm on the board. Just shouldn’t have anything to do with footy operations.
Just hire the bast people available they are out there.
 
A CEO taking an organisation backwards normally gets moved on fairly quickly in the real world.
But therein lies part of the debate about his PRIMARY responsibilities, which has never really been clarified.
We are making assumptions about what he should and shouldn’t be doing but he may be fulfilling all, or at least most, of what is expected of him.
Eg winning games, coach chosen by the board, purchase of players handled by Fulton/ Marshall( sure with his input over financials), but neither of which can be nailed directly on him. And he would probably be the first to say they are not his strengths ( but should they be, or not ?).
I personally think that he is not really the major problem. Need to get the Board sorted out, get the players ( if possible) the coach wants, and then let the coach do his thing.
Off the field we need good sponsors and an administration that sorts all the functions of a footy club. That needs to be overseen by a capable administration executive, which Pascoe appears to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top