WT Ownership, The Board & Senior Management - MEGA Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have no issue - context is your friend…
Old mate who’s telling everyone that the same blokes didn’t sack themselves also claimed the entire WT’s board was dismissed - when it wasn’t…
"The board of HBG along with the board of WSDRLFC & BDRLSFC implemented , in full the recommendation of the review that the entire WT board be dismissed effective immediately."

Mate I dont know if you are allergic to the truth or just have your panties in a bunch because Im the one telling it to you, but there is no other way of twisting it. The HBG met, Monday night and decided to fully implement the review recommendation which was to dismiss the entire WT board.

Straight out of Lees mouth.

HBG have since then implemented an interim board that includes Stapleton, Gilbert and Ofarrell
 
The 2 words you used are incorrect…
If you’re going to argue - argue the fact…

The members of the Holman Barnes Group board decided in conjunction with the other board members to remove themselves from the wests tigers board - the only one twisting it here is you.

You make no point?
you have no idea about corporate governance.

the memebrs of the WT board did not sack themselves, nor did they meet or make any decisions. The HBG, WSDRLFC and BalmainDRLFC boards did meet and made the decision to dismiss teh entire WT board effective immediately. Not sure why that is difficult to understand or why you need to argue the point.
 
you have no idea about corporate governance.

the memebrs of the WT board did not sack themselves, nor did they meet or make any decisions. The HBG, WSDRLFC and BalmainDRLFC boards did meet and made the decision to dismiss teh entire WT board effective immediately. Not sure why that is difficult to understand or why you need to argue the point.
God man, let it go. You have no idea of the seniority of people on the other side of this. Banding about how you know corporate governance and others don't.

You are right. But you're ignoring the fact that the same people who voted on HBG, WSDRFLC, and Balmain have a significant presence on the WT board. When people say that they voted to remove themselves, they are referring to the fact they voted, as part of the HBG board, to remove themselves from the WT board.

Tony, Julie, Rick and Dennis make up a majority vote on HBG, but also sit on WT board.

I'm not sure what you're not getting here.......
 
God man, let it go. You have no idea of the seniority of people on the other side of this. Banding about how you know corporate governance and others don't.

You are right. But you're ignoring the fact that the same people who voted on HBG, WSDRFLC, and Balmain have a significant presence on the WT board. When people say that they voted to remove themselves, they are referring to the fact they voted, as part of the HBG board, to remove themselves from the WT board.

Tony, Julie, Rick and Dennis make up a majority vote on HBG, but also sit on WT board.

I'm not sure what you're not getting here.......
Mate I was responding to Batboy saying that I was wrong by stating that the entire WT board had been dismissed. I wasn’t wrong, they were. Pretty straightforward but some here want to twist like stuck fish because it pisses them off that I’m right
 
Na Man,
They're not people - It's a board.....

Totally different.

Wrong again, I know more than enough of the subject.

It's not a Cheese Board mate... It's made up of names and faces, that make decisions.
You hide those names and faces behind whatever label you see fit.
The reality, (Where I prefer to concentrate) Is those names, and faces - are / were (for the majority) the same...

I'm not sure what purpose trying to disassociate them from one board to the next serves you,
Unless you're one of them.... In which case - Better luck with your next gig.
Mate, lets put this to bed, its boring you and me and I cant believe how annoying it is for everyone else. Just answer a few simple questions yes or no.

1. You said "Old mate who’s telling everyone that the same blokes didn’t sack themselves also claimed the entire WT’s board was dismissed - when it wasn’t…" - Was the entire board dismissed as a result of the HBG , BDRLFC & WSDRLFC biard meetings? - Hint 1 https://megaphone.link/NTETP2760156483 - hint 2 - The answer is yes.

2. Under the Corporations Act 2001 - are there minutes of meeting of the Holman Barnes Group that explain to shareholders and stakeholders the discussion behind and movement, seconding and voting for the motion to dismiss the entire Board of the West Tigers Board as required and prosecutable under the act? - Hint Yes

3. Under the Corporations Act 2001 - are there minutes of meeting of the Wests Tigers Board that explain to shareholders and stakeholders the discussion behind and movement, seconding and voting for the motion to dismiss the entire Board of the West Tigers Board as required and prosecutable under the act? Was there a quorum, what did the WT members who are not on the HGB Board have to say? - Hint Yeah nah.

Answer those three questions and we can leave this there and you can stop flipping in the breeze.
 
Mate, lets put this to bed, its boring you and me and I cant believe how annoying it is for everyone else. Just answer a few simple questions yes or no.

1. You said "Old mate who’s telling everyone that the same blokes didn’t sack themselves also claimed the entire WT’s board was dismissed - when it wasn’t…" - Was the entire board dismissed as a result of the HBG , BDRLFC & WSDRLFC biard meetings? - Hint 1 https://megaphone.link/NTETP2760156483 - hint 2 - The answer is yes.

2. Under the Corporations Act 2001 - are there minutes of meeting of the Holman Barnes Group that explain to shareholders and stakeholders the discussion behind and movement, seconding and voting for the motion to dismiss the entire Board of the West Tigers Board as required and prosecutable under the act? - Hint Yes

3. Under the Corporations Act 2001 - are there minutes of meeting of the Wests Tigers Board that explain to shareholders and stakeholders the discussion behind and movement, seconding and voting for the motion to dismiss the entire Board of the West Tigers Board as required and prosecutable under the act? Was there a quorum, what did the WT members who are not on the HGB Board have to say? - Hint Yeah nah.

Answer those three questions and we can leave this there and you can stop flipping in the breeze.
Dont worry about him Misty, he cant / won’t answer & just tries to move the goal posts when he talks crap & gets schooled.
 
Dont worry about him Misty, he cant / won’t answer & just tries to move the goal posts when he talks crap & gets schooled.
Exactly and did again this time......embarrassing himself.

moving-goal-posts-down-the-field.gif
 
He’s got you swallowing that sh*t as well?
You poor soul…

Calling them a board and removing the names and faces might work for you fellas… reality is -
same names - same faces.
You need to open a new thread.. call it batboys Bog on. You would be the sole contributor. There you could put forth a foolish argument. Then you could reply to yourself . Then you could try change the argument once you start beating yourself. The best thing for you is that you would actually be arguing with someone who cares what you have to say . That way, you could go home happy & leave the rest of the contrbutors to talk about real facts. Everyone wins!😁
 
Happy to answer your questions
- when you give me the names of the members of the Holman Barnes board - followed by the names or the WT board members they stood down.

If you could also confirm one last thing for me? those names that appear to be the same, are they in fact the same persons?

All yours bookworm
Excellent....finally getting to the end.
The HBG Board is .- Andreacchio, Romero, Burgess, Wayde, Tropiano, David Gilbert, Montgomery.

The names of the WT that were dismissed, in its entirety, effectively immediately by the HBG Board, WSDRLFC & BDRLFC Boards - Andreacchio, Romero, Burgess, Wayde, Stapleton, Hagipantellis, Dorahy.

Andreacchio, Romero, Burgess and Wayde are on both boards.

Stapleton, Hagipantellis and Dorahy are WT members on the WT board, protected under and answerable to the Corporations Act 2001 that are not on the HBG, didnt vote on the dismissal.

The Board of the Balmain District RLFC that Voted to dismiss the WT Board in its entirety, effectively immediately are Leslie Glen, Danny Stapleton, Garry Leo, Gary Thomson, Steve Lavers, Scott Drummond.

The Board of the Western Suburbs District RLFC that Voted to dismiss the WT Board in its entirety, effectively immediately are Andreacchio, Romero, Burgess, montgomery, fallah, Westlake, Cavanagh (interim),

I can confirm that Andreacchio, Romero, Burgess, Wayde, are in fact the same people, on both boards HBG & WT, both independently answerable to stakeholders and prosecutable under the Corporations Act 2001.

I can also confirm that Tropiano, David Gilbert, Montgomery, Stapleton, Hagipantellis, Dorahy, Leslie Glen, Danny Stapleton, Garry Leo, Gary Thomson, Steve Lavers, Scott Drummond, montgomery, fallah, Westlake, Cavanagh are not on both the HBG & WT Boards.

OK over to you flip flop boy, answer my questions.

1. You said "Old mate who’s telling everyone that the same blokes didn’t sack themselves also claimed the entire WT’s board was dismissed - when it wasn’t…" - Was the entire board dismissed as a result of the HBG , BDRLFC & WSDRLFC biard meetings? - Hint 1 https://megaphone.link/NTETP2760156483 - hint 2 - The answer is yes.

2. Under the Corporations Act 2001 - are there minutes of meeting of the Holman Barnes Group that explain to shareholders and stakeholders the discussion behind and movement, seconding and voting for the motion to dismiss the entire Board of the West Tigers Board as required and prosecutable under the act? - Hint Yes

3. Under the Corporations Act 2001 - are there minutes of meeting of the Wests Tigers Board that explain to shareholders and stakeholders the discussion behind and movement, seconding and voting for the motion to dismiss the entire Board of the West Tigers Board as required and prosecutable under the act? Was there a quorum, what did the WT members who are not on the HGB Board have to say? - Hint Yeah nah.

My prediction is you will flip flop and obfuscate.....lets see how I go.
 
He’s got you swallowing that sh*t as well?
You poor soul…

Calling them a board and removing the names and faces might work for you fellas… reality is -
same names - same faces.
Up to and on Monday night, 20 people sat down and voted to implement fully the recommendations of the review and to dismiss in entirety the West Tigers Board, effectively immediately.

of those 20 people, 4 are on the HBG Board and the WT Board and another is on the Balmain board.
 
Last edited:
Up to and on Monday night, 20 people sat down and voted to implement fully the recommendations of the review and to dismiss in entirety the West Tigers Board, effectively immediately.

of those 20 people, 4 are on the HBG Board and the WT Board and another is on the Balmain board.
Game , set , match to Misty Muzzle. Thank linesmen , thank you ballboys!
 
Fix up Cambo Ala Comm Bank . Put the junior COE next to it . Have the main base at concord for corporate and player attractiveness reasons .
Actually make a visible footprint in the area …. Have most of our junior teams from cubs up including fleggg through to wests reserve grade train out of there .
I would have a symbolic kind of hallway that at the end of it leads out of the place that is unused unless someone is graduating to the top 30/ concord .
Or something like that . Like imagine you’re a 16 year old working out in the gym , then you hear a bell ring , some other kid who’s 18/19 hugging everyone , his family is there , then you watch him walk down the hallway with Wests tigers greats pictures and every player who has played for wests tigers written on the wall .
You would watch that and just aspire to walk down that hallway one day .
This is the type of stuff we need . You need to make the junior COE have a clear connection to the main COE .
Sounds like a scene from Soylent Green.
 
I both admire and am appalled by your meticulous arrogance Mistyguns.

Playing for sheep stations at all times. I Don't know what you would do for fun if there was no internet and you couldn't start arguments with randos.

Misty is sharp & brings receipts. He's not
arguing with a rando, he's been put on the
backfoot and has since stated facts. You
don't have to like it/him, but refrain from
the cheerleading for guys on the internet
 
Misty is sharp & brings receipts. He's not
arguing with a rando, he's been put on the
backfoot and has since stated facts. You
don't have to like it/him, but refrain from
the cheerleading for guys on the internet
We're all rando's. It's an anonymous forum.
It's a bit silly to put more effort into posts on here than I put into university assignments.
He'll be citing sources and including a bibliography soon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top