Managers are all about their commission. Fulton is no use to them without a club. He will need to get some other club to take him on and his media mates.
Scott Fulton sacked
- Thread starter WesternSuburbsBoy
- Start date
That is a slight concern, but could it be a stance from Shane Richardson that he does not suck up to anyone and no player manager or player is bigger than the club.
He would be experienced enough to know you cannot let player managers dictate who the club should or should not sign or re-sign.
jrtiger
Well-known member
there’s a few interviews Richo did before taking us on where he said you can’t box yourself into a corner where player managers can dictate terms to you, and that you must have the cattle lined up in your pathways to ensure these situations don’t occur.
I’d say he’s not fussed in the slightest.
Roar_Power
Well-known member
We sacked him....yet he is a huge loss for us.
Don Kershane
Well-known member
Postecoglou and Richo - same playbook.
Roar_Power
Well-known member
Brooks left us. He had a contract offer.
Didn't the same masthead claim Luai was only signing because he loved Benji and Benji went and seen him personally or some such a week or 2 back?
426Tlgerland
Well-known member
Yes 100% it was Benji not Fulton and his close ties to players , well that won’t matter for years as we have locked them up long term , Richo on fire with his dead wood clean out
It might be about Galvin . Ie. Isaac Moses . A lot of talk about how he’s the next superstar , but everyone with a little club insight has been saying he wants out/ Moses wants him out . It also might be about removing the obvious manly / wests tension by McDonnell and Fulton doing the swapsies.
It might limit us in the mean time , but it’s pretty smart in general . Basically all the guys who caused all the bullshit are no longer here . Benji , whilst having a say was clearly put in a shit spot by the Pascoe incompetence, the Lee ego , and the Fulton white anting .
I’m a little concerned , but basically player managers get thier foothold in clubs with weak management . Brisbane with Seibold and Moses . That’s no more . Us with Moses’s , then tartak , that’s no more . Same for the warriors . The only weak management club at the moment is manly , maybe the dragons . It sends a clear message to the rest of the nrl . I think it’s a smart decision.
It was for the best 🤝
426Tlgerland
Well-known member
He will not attack as I’m sure he Richo won’t hold back
Hopefully Nofo.
Probably AD
Roar_Power
Well-known member
Obviously Benji and Richo are confident enough in retaining who they want out of the Tartak stable ie. Kit, Fainu etc. Hope so for the clubs sake.
Roar_Power
Well-known member
Yes it was.
426Tlgerland
Well-known member
Kids are locked in , who cares about Mario. , plus we got more kids coming through
Tartak Managed Benji for years if I'm not mistaken....
Fultons relationship with him would be no better than Benji's
- Especially now Benji is a Coach.
Richo's first Power Play backing the coach
I think it's a bit of a mistake having the boys club in charge of absolutely everything
(No accountability in that) - But that seems to be the way we're going...
This scares me.
Otherwise, know nothing about him/his operations, so don't really care. Just the above, and how it reflects on our club when it comes to the player market.
They'll be even more confident if we can possibly start winning...
851
Well-known member
Hopefully the Fainu brothers are ok with this, Latu would be a huge loss, and he hasn't played a game for us yet
