Wests Tigers Home Ground Mega Thread

This question about where the Wests Tigers should have their "home ground" has been the elephant in the room since the joint venture was formed.

No one has ever had the vision (or the balls) to do something, once and for all.

I, like all fans, have my own thoughts as to what might suit me best.

But at the end of the day, the club just has to have its own ground.

And now, among all the consequences of the "review" - in steps interim CEO Richardson: he sees the problem for what it is and is determined to bring action to the table.

I don't really know where this will end, but it will all come to a head, and as a fan, I know that if I want to follow this team - the ground of choice will become my "home ground" too.
Richardson has fresh, unbiased eyes on the club.
 
That is utter trite. We’re as much Wests as we are the Tigers. To claim otherwise is both ignorant and disrespectful.
What are you talking about ! There is no wests theirs is no tigers . There is wests tigers ! That is it … everything else is about as relevant as the bears and the Newtown jets .
I’m so sick of every 2-3 months the same dudes drag this shit up ….. What year is it …
 
It'd be nice to have a ground that if we ever do make the finals we could play at.
You couldn't play a semi at either ground at the moment. You'd be locking 25000 people out.
 
Last edited:
What are you talking about ! There is no wests theirs is no tigers . There is wests tigers ! That is it … everything else is about as relevant as the bears and the Newtown jets .
I’m so sick of every 2-3 months the same dudes drag this shit up ….. What year is it …
So we must be referred to by both names at all times? Yeah, nah.
 
Don't suggest I don't know what the Hills like.... I sat there plenty of times before it began to not agree with my back..
I was merely replying to bzn's suggestion of alcohol free games, it wouldn't work... Maybe they need more booze free zones. I dunno but that's beside the point I think we are getting away from the main picture

I've been thinking a lot about this idea of the NRL buying the ground and leasing it to WTs... Trying to think whatd be the pros. N. Cons.
Not sure who owns it currently but I'm sure the price tag would likely put it out of anyone's reach

To buy is one thing it still needs cash to update as well. Once you own it you need to maintain/insurance etc which are additional costs.

It will need more than 1 update in 20yrs as well so more costs will occur.

Huge investment for maybe 5-6 nrl & wnrl games a year. We know that number won’t increase if it means less games at Cambo.

Would take more than 100yrs to pay back initial investment let alone upgrade etc.

It’s fantasy land even talking about the NRL buying it.
 
Let me get this straight, Leichhardt Oval in it's current decrepit state is used 83 times a year and no one can spend any money on it.

Penrith Park/BlueBet Stadium currently is used 12 times a year and they want to spend 300 million plus on it, makes sense.
leichardt oval is hosting 120 individual fixtures some of that is women's a league soccer and club rugby however so does not get big crowds but the ground does get used

Penrith is playing 12 home games and gets the upgrades, lucky to be in a swing seat I guess
 
So we must be referred to by both names at all times? Yeah, nah.
?? Are you just being a dick ?
I’m clearly referring to deep seated issue of constantly referring to wests implying wests magpies . Or tigers implying Balmain tigers .
These people like Colin , and a few other don’t see wests tigers . They see magpies in black and gold .
And openly , as recently as whilst the review was being conducted last year , called for us to become the magpies , and talked about it as a given .
That’s the shit I’m talking about . It’s not the words , but the implication by these individuals of what each word represents .and I’m honestly sick of seeing it …
 
?? Are you just being a dick ?
I’m clearly referring to deep seated issue of constantly referring to wests implying wests magpies . Or tigers implying Balmain tigers .
Maybe in your own mind you are, that is not how it’s coming across.
 
What are you talking about ! There is no wests theirs is no tigers . There is wests tigers ! That is it … everything else is about as relevant as the bears and the Newtown jets .
I’m so sick of every 2-3 months the same dudes drag this shit up ….. What year is it …
Commentators mention it week in week out
 
?? Are you just being a dick ?
I’m clearly referring to deep seated issue of constantly referring to wests implying wests magpies . Or tigers implying Balmain tigers .
These people like Colin , and a few other don’t see wests tigers . They see magpies in black and gold .
And openly , as recently as whilst the review was being conducted last year , called for us to become the magpies , and talked about it as a given .
That’s the shit I’m talking about . It’s not the words , but the implication by these individuals of what each word represents .and I’m honestly sick of seeing it …
OK I didn't see this post before I replied to your earlier post... I agree with you here but fossils last a long time
 
?? Are you just being a dick ?
I’m clearly referring to deep seated issue of constantly referring to wests implying wests magpies . Or tigers implying Balmain tigers .
These people like Colin , and a few other don’t see wests tigers . They see magpies in black and gold .
And openly , as recently as whilst the review was being conducted last year , called for us to become the magpies , and talked about it as a given .
That’s the shit I’m talking about . It’s not the words , but the implication by these individuals of what each word represents .and I’m honestly sick of seeing it …
I'm curious.
Have you ever posted on here without picking a blue?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BZN
Maybe in your own mind you are, that is not how it’s coming across.
Well I’m telling you now that’s what I mean . There is no “wests” there is no “tigers” there is wests tigers . And no I’m not being litteral to wording and playing games . I’m talking about both words and what they represent to certain individuals .
And it’s the same dudes on here . It’s so dumb …. If you are 49 years old and younger , you have been supporting the wests tigers longer than either club . And dare I say that’s probably closer to 53-54 .
That’s a fair chunk to the population . I do not understand this type of rhetoric in 2024 .
 
We're extremely lucky to have a bloke like Richo who's above paying any attention to any of the orange v black and white stuff and only cares about making the joint successful.
You all fought and whinged and moaned about the management and now that we have a bloke looking after our best interests a large percentage are still pissing and moaning.
It's silly, but not surprising.
 
I don't see the point of the argument the Leichardt is used for all these other games - in reality those other things could all continue because they don't attract corporates or large crowds - the money isn't for the surface it's for grandstands and facilities for crowds which we only host 5 games a year where that's needed. I love the ground but can understand the government spending money on it. I would like a 30k stadium at Homebush for nrl club games but given that is unlikely then have it at Accor
 
I'm curious.
Have you ever posted on here without picking a blue?
What for calling the magpies / Balmain bullshit out for what it is ? It’s garbage times 10 that for 99% of us was out to bed 10 years ago when Balmain shat the bed thanks to Backdoor.
The whole point of the forum is to debate topics .
I didn’t pick a fight with Gunnar . Pretty much the opposite actually
 
What for calling the magpies / Balmain bullshit out for what it is ? It’s garbage times 10 that for 99% of us was out to bed 10 years ago when Balmain shat the bed thanks to Backdoor.
The whole point of the forum is to debate topics .
I didn’t pick a fight with Gunnar . Pretty much the opposite actually
Mate, you were the one calling me a dick. Tone it down a bit.
 
Back
Top