Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yup Joe O could still be very handy for us!!!Really hate strengthening another clubs roster who are ahead of us mid season. We have done it three years running now and I see no value in it for us given our position.
That would be a perfect scenario for us if Sullivan agreed to it.In regard to moving players like Sullivan on- someone touched on something I've been thinking about for a while.
Remember when the Tigers & Storm had that swap deal with Harry Grant & Momorovski?
Why don't NRL clubs align with SL clubs for similar deals? The English Football competition (soccer) allows for season long loans between clubs to get young players or excess players game time at other clubs.
Why couldn't we loan Sullivan out for a season? Gives him valuable game time against good competition, develops the player & nobody loses- Tigers get a Top 30 spot free, Sullivan earns his full contract between 2 clubs, the SL club gets a 'probable' upgrade at halfback for a year. Why can't loan deals for rising youth players happen? Latu Fainu could benefit from exposure to first team football at a SL club. TDS. Fa'agutu etc.
It would be the same for most NRL clubs I'm sure.
It could also give clubs that develop their own talent the opportunity to keep those players on their books instead of losing them to other NRL clubs promising to give them their opportunity...
If we lose another 4 games we’ll find out.Is Stefano really one of the NRL's most in demand players?
Sure, a club would pick him up if we let him go, but one of the most in demand is surely a bit over the top especially when we are talking in the $800k plus region.
Maybe I'm missing something.
my understanding is we still need 30 contracted NRL players and up to 6 development contracts. So if that is the case he will have to be replaced by another player. The player might be on minimum contract, but I don’t think Jake would have been on a big contract, so I don’t think it frees up much cap spaceNo funds free for 25, but frees up cash for 24. Perhaps to front load, upgrade or bring someone in.
The season is over anyway...the cash is more valuable than the player.
It’s a great idea. Maybe that’s one of the reasons for the NRL’s buy out of SL? They could then align contracts to facilitate player swaps?In regard to moving players like Sullivan on- someone touched on something I've been thinking about for a while.
Remember when the Tigers & Storm had that swap deal with Harry Grant & Momorovski?
Why don't NRL clubs align with SL clubs for similar deals? The English Football competition (soccer) allows for season long loans between clubs to get young players or excess players game time at other clubs.
Why couldn't we loan Sullivan out for a season? Gives him valuable game time against good competition, develops the player & nobody loses- Tigers get a Top 30 spot free, Sullivan earns his full contract between 2 clubs, the SL club gets a 'probable' upgrade at halfback for a year. Why can't loan deals for rising youth players happen? Latu Fainu could benefit from exposure to first team football at a SL club. TDS. Fa'agutu etc.
It would be the same for most NRL clubs I'm sure.
It could also give clubs that develop their own talent the opportunity to keep those players on their books instead of losing them to other NRL clubs promising to give them their opportunity...
I doubt he will be a regular first grader at the Sea Eagles either. Signed as back-up / depth, same as he is at Wests Tigers.He'll play semi finals at Manly long before he would have at the Tigers.
Who needs a rake this season?Sounds like maybe he is in the start of his 10 day cooling off period. Wonder who he is signed with.
ManlyWho needs a rake this season?
Simpkin off contract so not sure this helps us in any way, just weakens our depth this year.
Media saying he was on 400k, but who knows?.my understanding is we still need 30 contracted NRL players and up to 6 development contracts. So if that is the case he will have to be replaced by another player. The player might be on minimum contract, but I don’t think Jake would have been on a big contract, so I don’t think it frees up much cap space
We don't need him we have TDS.Who needs a rake this season?
Simpkin off contract so not sure this helps us in any way, just weakens our depth this year.
You might want to see a doctor about that 🤔We don't need him we have TDS.
Sounds good in theory but convincing any of the juniors to go over to England for a year would be a massive taskIn regard to moving players like Sullivan on- someone touched on something I've been thinking about for a while.
Remember when the Tigers & Storm had that swap deal with Harry Grant & Momorovski?
Why don't NRL clubs align with SL clubs for similar deals? The English Football competition (soccer) allows for season long loans between clubs to get young players or excess players game time at other clubs.
Why couldn't we loan Sullivan out for a season? Gives him valuable game time against good competition, develops the player & nobody loses- Tigers get a Top 30 spot free, Sullivan earns his full contract between 2 clubs, the SL club gets a 'probable' upgrade at halfback for a year. Why can't loan deals for rising youth players happen? Latu Fainu could benefit from exposure to first team football at a SL club. TDS. Fa'agutu etc.
It would be the same for most NRL clubs I'm sure.
It could also give clubs that develop their own talent the opportunity to keep those players on their books instead of losing them to other NRL clubs promising to give them their opportunity...
Makes sense if he was on that muchMedia saying he was on 400k, but who knows?.
Speaking of that article. Did you see he was on 1.2 mil over 2 seasons(600k a year)? Why would they sign him on that before trying to lock up Turuva..Penrith looking to terminate Taylan May's contract. The Roosters would be the favourites to sign him given they already have Terrell and they're losing their starting centres. They used to have a habit of signing players sacked by other clubs, but no recent examples come to mind.
Of course, it's a moot point until his criminal matter is decided given the NRL's stand down policy.
Strongly suspect under Cleary there is favouritism in spreading the limited $$$ around.Speaking of that article. Did you see he was on 1.2 mil over 2 seasons(600k a year)? Why would they sign him on that before trying to lock up Turuva..
Limited money but throwing 600k there is wild. But Cleary knows best igStrongly suspect under Cleary there is favouritism in spreading the limited $$$ around.