pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
Do they though?
In recent times Burton, Kikau and Crichton have gone from the premiers to a struggling dogs as well as Api to Tigers. Papallii left as a Dally M 2rf from a grand final side to Tigers (even if it hasn't worked out). The Dolphins picked up half the Storms starting pack and a couple of internationals from the Broncos GF team.
The salary cap is for from perfect but there is plenty of examples of players leaving strong clubs for lesser ones due to Cap constraints. We've seen clubs like Knights, Souths, Cowboys, Eels, and Dogs rise and fall. Is it really the NRLs fault we can't dig ourselves out of the hole were in.
Galvin could be described as a player who dominates an era and stays at the top of the game for the next 10 years. He has been identified as a player the club could build a future team around. The club can dig itself out of a hole by all means but it is much harder to achieve when Galvin has over 2 years remaining on his contract and yet this has emerged and not for the first time. Moses, Tedesco, Woods etc have all left the club over the years and I have no great complaint about their decisions. But this one is a little different imo. I did write earlier in the year that the world order in the NRL has gone wrong, because we as one of the moderately performed clubs should not have arguably one of the best junior talents in the game. With a good dose of cynicism it seems others agree.