I posted much of this in the sack Benji thread - but it is equally as relevant here.
We have a simple game plan that isn't being executed - is that on the coach or the players? You can debate that until the cows come home as it is subjective. If we do some comparative analysis, taking the emotion out of the discussion, you can make a more educated decision. The team closest to us in recent history is the dogs. They are currently sitting in the 8 and have the bye in front of them.
Take the current roster situation off the board and look at the trajectory of both clubs:
- Dogs performance was on par with ours.
- Dogs sign a proven administrator in Gus - we sign a proven administrator but later in the timeline.
- Dogs signed a bunch of quality players and a new (but experienced coach) but performance does not improve - we sign Api, Papalii, Klemmer, unearth Bula, sign Olam and appoint Benji - no change.
- Dogs have heaps of internal dramas as culture is addressed; fans and the media label Ciraldo as a dud and want him sacked - Tigers fans and media call for Benjis head.
- Dogs sign a bunch of fringe FG quality players from other clubs and add a couple of top tier players - currently sitting in the top eight. Tigers make it clear they are going to offload a buch of deadwood and embark on a mid year recruiting raid of the UK. Tigers sign a marquee half and a quality centre/wing. Start offloading underperformers.
it is clear that we are taking the same steps towards improvement as the Dogs did but are a little further behind in the timeline.
Is the club cooked? Based on comparative analysis of an equally poorly run club that has turned it around the answer is No. Are we currently setting the conditions for success? I argue that the answer is yes. Can you guarantee success - too many variables; but you can see that we are treading the same path that other clubs have recently taken to success. Souths. Penrith and Dogs are pretty good examples of what success could look like.