AmericanHistoryX
Well-known member
Thats why they leave.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If those quotes in the article are the only thing he said, he isn't having a dig at Tigers at all. He just says Sam Burgess has a good culture at Wolves.Don't know, don't care. But it is always easy as an employee to put the boot in when they leave - media will eat it up. Same mindset set as blaming a coach for poor on field performances. Always easier to sack one person than the team.
Agreed. My post was poorly articulated. (and to fair didn't even read it). I meant I don't really care what is reported in the media - they will always make a mountain out of a mole hill when it comes to WT - even if a comment wasn't meant as negative, they will find a way to make it one. Click bait/ WT anti-bias. 🤷♂️If those quotes in the article are the only thing he said, he isn't having a dig at Tigers at all. He just says Sam Burgess has a good culture at Wolves.
Whatever you think about Bateman, I can't recall him airing any dirty laundry in public, at Tigers or Raiders.
He only played 16 games for the Tigers yet won more games for the Tigers than Brooks did in what felt like 30 years that low IQ stooge cosplayed as a first grader. Hastings left 90% because Bateman wouldn't play in the same team and 10% Sheens wanted him at lock. Hastings all day.
He only played 16 games for the Tigers yet won more games for the Tigers than Brooks did in what felt like 30 years that low IQ stooge cosplayed as a first grader. Hastings left 90% because Bateman wouldn't play in the same team and 10% Sheens wanted him at lock. Hastings all day.
You never rated Bateman? Okay. How do you rate yourself? Within your family.
But not rubbish here. If you rubbish others expect rubbish. Bateman did his best. Stef did. They all do. Just we need a leader
Stop it , Winston , ur making far too much sense, blokes like u are very dangerous, pedaling truths like that . 😳Should we have?
I mean, marginally yes. Hastings has done a little better then Brooks. He was clearly more halfback then Brooks and clearly a better organisational footballer.
That said, he hasn't set the world alight at Newcastle.
If the roumers are true, we moved Hastings on to get Bateman.... Correct, hindsight Horrible move.
I don't think that was the big mistake.
The big mistake was not thinking big. Adam Reynolds. Break open the bank, Madge coached him at Souths and he would have surely prefered a Sydney home. We for some idiotic reason target Hastings over Reynolds. Brisbane signed Reynolds and signed him for 800k. (from memory). Had we brought Reynolds here, told Brooks he was playing 5/8 and told Doueihi to do something else (fullback?), WE would have had a spine.
Yep...just a clickbait headlineIf those quotes in the article are the only thing he said, he isn't having a dig at Tigers at all. He just says Sam Burgess has a good culture at Wolves.
Whatever you think about Bateman, I can't recall him airing any dirty laundry in public, at Tigers or Raiders.
I found this to be a funny quote from Burgess about Bateman.
“He’s a calm mind and I’ll probably say at the weekend it wasn’t our calmest performance (against London Broncos) so it was good having him out there along with a few more of the cool heads, so that’s what he brings, he brings great leadership. I don’t know where he’ll play but he’ll be playing.”