KCTiger2
Well-known member
Switch Twal and PoleWouldn’t say non-existent.
8 Pole
9 Api
10 Klemmer
11 Samuela Fainu
12 Bateman/ Seyfarth
13 Latu Fainu/ Bateman
14 Twal
15 Sione Fainu
16
17
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Switch Twal and PoleWouldn’t say non-existent.
8 Pole
9 Api
10 Klemmer
11 Samuela Fainu
12 Bateman/ Seyfarth
13 Latu Fainu/ Bateman
14 Twal
15 Sione Fainu
16
17
No because Heino is already an assistant coachAnyone think Heino repalces Farah as assistant coach
Benji , Morris , Heino
new water boy to be added
Poles defence isn’t the best but it has improved from last year and will keep improving the good thing with Pole is he knows his defence sucks but he is keen to work on it and improve itFollowing the advice of people on here I've started to watch Seyfarth off the ball more, and compare his effort in D with other forwards.
Watching all our forwards and how hard they work to control the ruck or as Marker, he is becoming a player I can really appreciate. Since I've been paying attention he's been getting better at slowing the ruck down using without using his hands and giving away less penalties.
Pole has potential but as another poster correctly pointed out to me he is all attack at the moment, and I now agree.
Stefs effort without the ball is pretty poor, I think he's in for a shock in Melbourne. He doesn't work hard to get to Marker, and even Klemmer moves better than him in defence in general.
Twal professional and a good overall effort, really lacks impact in any one area and his play the ball speed is going backwards.
Papalii not as dynamic as he was at parra but I think he's our best forward based on all these little things + the more noticeable stuff (in the middle, re really did seem to cruise on the edge for us). Johannsen intrigues me as a replacement but small sample size and honestly would rather not keep gambling on players stepping up as plan A, B and C.
Sione I think can be just as good, has a bit of Poles footwork, but a better passing game and a little closer in D, still not there yet but improving.
Samuela could be anything.
I hope we work on strength and fitness, I think our pack looks tired at times and it was ridiculous how small and weak the dragons made us look, and they are nothing special.
2 or 3 FG quality forwards and I'll be happy.
I disagree on twal . He has been coming off the bench and shoring up the middle , and providing more clarity in defence for his outside men .Poles defence isn’t the best but it has improved from last year and will keep improving the good thing with Pole is he knows his defence sucks but he is keen to work on it and improve it
Twal has never and will never provide impact that is why he is much better as a starter then a bench prop
They have exceptional line speedVery good summary, I watched the dogs forwards last night , they look so much fitter than us , they move quicker back into defence when they have made a tackle, there little men make more yards, just with quick leg speed , there’s a bit to be learned by backing down other teams strong points
Mind you, this is the second time we have done that with him.Why did we rush to re-sign AD before he played a game of NRL this season?
Also takes up a top 30 spot that we desperately need.We got him for near min wage I believe, covers plenty of positions.
Twal actually has good leg drive when in the tackle and is rarely stopped at the point of contact- I think he's better than people suspect, while not being elite. But not all the pack need to be elite, and not all the pack need to be starting quality. If Twal starts & you get 3 really decent impact guys off the bench, that's still a good pack. I think 2 x damaging runners & 1 x damaging defender on the bench, plus that versatile guy, gives you the flexibility needed in the modern NRL.I disagree on twal . He has been coming off the bench and shoring up the middle , and providing more clarity in defence for his outside men .
He may lack spectacular runs , but he makes up for it in pure work ethic and grit .
Sam Fainu also has this grit and work ethic . He is always willing to take that “hiding to nothing “ hit up 20 from our own line after 3 failed runs from the backs .
Twal is a very good player and you know the performance you will receive when he is on-field. He is very underrated but not by me and many who supports WTs.Twal actually has good leg drive when in the tackle and is rarely stopped at the point of contact- I think he's better than people suspect, while not being elite. But not all the pack need to be elite, and not all the pack need to be starting quality. If Twal starts & you get 3 really decent impact guys off the bench, that's still a good pack. I think 2 x damaging runners & 1 x damaging defender on the bench, plus that versatile guy, gives you the flexibility needed in the modern NRL.
You need to absorb & endure the initial onslaught, while still having impact (particularly out wide). Twal, Klemmer & Horsburgh in the middle, with Sam Fainu & Seyfarth out wide- then Pole, Sione Fainu & Hetherington along with a versatile guy...that's an effective forward pack.
You just need to have 3-4 guys in KOE pushing to get those bench spots for themselves- then you have the depth to cover injury & form slumps.
I think Latu would be happy to play anywhere-seems to so mobile the actual named position would be largely irrelevant.
I agree however Twal starting does his job and does it well and it allows us to bring Klemmer off the bench where the game is slower for him and he can do Twals jobI disagree on twal . He has been coming off the bench and shoring up the middle , and providing more clarity in defence for his outside men .
He may lack spectacular runs , but he makes up for it in pure work ethic and grit .
Sam Fainu also has this grit and work ethic . He is always willing to take that “hiding to nothing “ hit up 20 from our own line after 3 failed runs from the backs .
I think everyone is well aware what mighty boy can do and that is why we get a little annoyed when he gets dominated so easily and now signs elsewhere. His best and worst are way too far apart, it’s obvious if he pulls his finger out he will be one of the best props in the game.As a I love a good stat..
2024-
Utoikamanu - 23 Appearances, 96 tackle breaks, 970 post contact metres, 9.9 avg hit-ups
Oregon Kaufusi- 21 Appearances, 29 tackle breaks, 698 post contact metres, 7 avg hit-ups
NAS- 15 Appearances, 33 tackle breaks, 562.3 post contact metres, 9.1 avg hit-ups
Alex Twal- 17 Appearances, 28 tackle breaks, 549.1 post contact metres, 8.5 avg hit-ups
Daniel Saifiti- 19 Appearances, 27 tackle breaks, 820.5 post contact metres, 8.7 avg hit-ups
Royce Hunt- 13 Appearances, 20 tackle breaks, 392.8 post contact metres, 5.1 avg hit-ups
David Klemmer- 19 Appearances, 15 tackle breaks, 824.9 post contact metres, 9.6 avg hit-ups
Fonua Pole- 22 Appearances, 43 tackle breaks, 961.3 post contact metres, 9 avg hit-ups
Sione Fainu- 11 Appearances, 9 tackle breaks, 338.7 post contact metres, 6 avg hit-ups
Yeah, I know- stats lie, blah, blah.
However- over the course of the season- stats DO tell a story.
We will lose one of, if not the most destructive tackle breaking props next season. Interestingly, Pole has very similar post-contact metres, however. And Klemmer is right in line with Daniel Saifiti for post-contact as well. NAS has significantly less appearances than Pole & Utoikamanu & it could be argued his tackle busts might rival at least Pole if he played more. What I find interesting though is just how close NAS, Oregon Kaufusi & our very own Alex Twal are on overall impact.
There are posters that would jump all over Kaufusi as a signing, but how much better does he perform to Alex Twal?
Also, how far behind in performance is Royce Hunt to a number of our guys already? He's marginally more effective than Sione Fainu over the course of the season.
Very interesting.As a I love a good stat..
2024-
Utoikamanu - 23 Appearances, 96 tackle breaks, 970 post contact metres, 9.9 avg hit-ups
Oregon Kaufusi- 21 Appearances, 29 tackle breaks, 698 post contact metres, 7 avg hit-ups
NAS- 15 Appearances, 33 tackle breaks, 562.3 post contact metres, 9.1 avg hit-ups
Alex Twal- 17 Appearances, 28 tackle breaks, 549.1 post contact metres, 8.5 avg hit-ups
Daniel Saifiti- 19 Appearances, 27 tackle breaks, 820.5 post contact metres, 8.7 avg hit-ups
Royce Hunt- 13 Appearances, 20 tackle breaks, 392.8 post contact metres, 5.1 avg hit-ups
David Klemmer- 19 Appearances, 15 tackle breaks, 824.9 post contact metres, 9.6 avg hit-ups
Fonua Pole- 22 Appearances, 43 tackle breaks, 961.3 post contact metres, 9 avg hit-ups
Sione Fainu- 11 Appearances, 9 tackle breaks, 338.7 post contact metres, 6 avg hit-ups
Yeah, I know- stats lie, blah, blah.
However- over the course of the season- stats DO tell a story.
We will lose one of, if not the most destructive tackle breaking props next season. Interestingly, Pole has very similar post-contact metres, however. And Klemmer is right in line with Daniel Saifiti for post-contact as well. NAS has significantly less appearances than Pole & Utoikamanu & it could be argued his tackle busts might rival at least Pole if he played more. What I find interesting though is just how close NAS, Oregon Kaufusi & our very own Alex Twal are on overall impact.
There are posters that would jump all over Kaufusi as a signing, but how much better does he perform to Alex Twal?
Also, how far behind in performance is Royce Hunt to a number of our guys already? He's marginally more effective than Sione Fainu over the course of the season.
I can see why people want to tie up Pole but really think he gets a bit of a free ride in rating his performances compared to some of the blokes around him.
And where has that pack taken us , also lose 2 others , I think ur been very nice to a poor packWouldn’t say non-existent.
8 Pole
9 Api
10 Klemmer
11 Samuela Fainu
12 Bateman/ Seyfarth
13 Latu Fainu/ Bateman
14 Twal
15 Sione Fainu
16
17
Pole's attack has been great. He's a different type of middle to Utoikamanu, but his subtle footwork combined with his leg speed is very effective.I can see why people want to tie up Pole but really think he gets a bit of a free ride in rating his performances compared to some of the blokes around him.