Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hate AD. How dare you lol. Seyfarth is not a starting NRL player. I am not a fan of him like so many tigers fans are. Right centre was the one position I wanted us to sign a player in and right second row too. Ice would have been good to keepAD fan and hate on Seyfarth, I should add you to my ignore list
I'll give him credit where it's due. He started the season well. We had 2 wins vs eels and sharks which were great. We went on a losing run which is expected with a team like ours, but where the season really imploded is when he went on that holiday and we got flogged by the dragons in wollongong. Our season went downhill from there and never recovered fully apart from a win vs a negative raiders team and some late scraps. Not expecting us to beat any of the top teams, just be competitive in most games, and we knew the result before half time in most games in the back end of the season.RG,
Thanks for your take, but most of what you have provided are opinions as opposed to examples. While I expect that some of these are contibutors to our poor performance in and of themselves they don't indicate that he is a shit coach.
Two wooden spoons may be partly attributed to coaching but the player roster probably has more bearing on that, and the playing roster can be linked to the previous selection committee and board. I don't think you can ditectly link tow wooden spoons to poor coaching; the facts just don't support that conclusion. Could a more experineced coach have got us over the line - perhaps but not to the extent we were pushing for the eight with the roster we had. I can fully support that poor coaching cost us the spoon bowl - but that would have moved us from 17th the 16th. No change really.
So who was constantly picked out of position? I didn't recall this as an issue. I would suggest that this is a matter of opinion as opposed to an example of poor coaching. To me this is a generalisation as opposed to evidence of poor coaching. How wna when did this cause our poor performances?
I would have preferred to ease Galvin into FG as well; however, he is not the first 18 year old to debut and play FG; many in teams with successful coaches. Giving young players exposure, even at 18, can fast-track their development. Injuries and overplaying are legitimate concerns, but the responsibility for player welfare involves multiple staff, not just the head coach. So you I expect we are looking at the high perfromance and medical teams as well. Our arm chair opinions don't carry much weight here. Who would you have replaced him with? Sulivan - and if he did and had Galvin in Reggies people would be calling for his head for playing Sullivan instead of the kid, No win and not an example of poor coaching. On the other hand plenty of seasoned commentators are signing his praises for taking the approach he did with Galvin. Johns and Gus decelaring him a revelation at the Tigers and the best teen they have ever seen. This is a matter of opinion as opposed to evidence of him being a poor coach.
I don't think you can say there was a lack of a defensive game plan. In fact when they executed the defensive game plan well we perfromed well. There were times when we had good line speed, times when we had very good chase, time when we didn't have shooters in the line causing holes. When we put it together for 80 minutes we won games. We had too many lapses - was that fitness, player ability (AD/Sezer/The Pillow for example). I highly doubt that we didn't spend time coaching a workable defensive game plan, The evidence clearly shows that we did; what we don't know is why we couldn't put it together for the duration of the game. Too complex - haven't heard that anywhere - all indications are that he simplified the game plans.
I'm struggling to understand how Benji's coaching was responsible for the lack of discipline from the playing group. He sacked Naden for it, Bateman was exiled as a result of being called out for it, Seyfarth reeled it in, Sezer was going to be replaced by?????. If anything he was very clear, and in the pressers as well, that he was not happy with the discipline and that if the plyers didn't change the would change the players. I don't buy this at all.
There is a balance between being one of the boys and being the coach. Unless you are on the inside how can anyone say if he has it right or wrong. I am not hearing anything from inside of the camp that support this - in fact most of the players when interviewd say the oipposite- he gets in with theboys and shows them what he wants and is also very direct and calls a spade a spade. We have heard that he has taken a very different approach to this pre season as well. Have you considered that being “one of the boys” might actually help foster a supportive environment, particularly for a team in transition or rebuilding mod? Benji’s experience and charisma could be what turns us around. I'm not saying at all that he has the balance right - but I don't see any evidence that supports your opinion. I'm on the fence with this.
How do you link the approach to pressers to being a poor coach. This is a stretch and again a matter of opinion, You coule equally argue that publicly backing the team, even in tough times, shields players from external pressures and media scrutiny. You can bet that Benji's Monday morning video sessions don't include his press comments. What do you know about his internal accountability measures? I doubt this is visible to outsiders, so if you have evidence to support the point I am all ears but this is purely opinion.
Look I get that we haven't performed well. I'm on the fence as to his coaching ability as there is evidence to suggest that the plying group have been instructed on what to do, but have failed to execute it. They boys on the Wests Tigers Faithful podcast did an excellent breakdown of our performace over 2024 and one of the more telling facts was where we were receiving the ball from and turning the ball over to the opposition. So we weren't able to get out of our end - that isn't coaching that the poor roster. The attackign stats in several areas were at the top of the league and some of our defensive stats were also OK. So the evidence does not support the opinions that many had in realtion to poor attack and defence.
Benji's coaching career is just beginning. Judging him on early results ignores the possibility of growth, refinement, and the impact of long-term strategies. Strategies that Benji and Richo have stated on many occasions are in place and they are not deviating from the pla. The team needs time to be adapted to this vision and strategy. Despite Benji being here for a couple of years the vision and strategy started in 2024.
Every coach starts somewhere, and while early results or decisions may be polarising, it's crucial to give time for development and see where his leadership takes the team. So at the end of the day I still seen haven't seen much evidence that supports the statements that his coaching is poor. I have seen no evidence that supports the statements that he is shit coach; just plenty of opinion.
He has definitely made mistakes, but what coach hasn't? Until somone provides evidence that his coaching is poor I'm still sitting on the fence and giving him some more rope.
He's managed by Isaac Moses and the Roosters have declared they won't deal with any player managed by him anymore so all this talk about Galvin to the Roosters I find hard to believeWe should make sure we look after Latu F big time as he will be our future 6 with Laui. Every article and interview Galvin does not give me any hope of him sticking around IMO.
His manager is all about money and feel Roosters or Dogs know this and will Jump Nov 1.
I hope I'm wrong but don't want to put all our hopes in a guy that won't commit and then lose him and Latu as well in a few years.
I also don't buy this waiting to see how we go especially when Richo and Benji have done a A+ recruitment drive and done their side of the deal. Now it's on the players to do their side.
@JollsGreat post Jolls, always well thought out, opinionated, but open to debate, and without pushing an agenda. That’s the best article/post I’ve read this week.
I did need an intermission. 😎
I think you may be correct but I don’t get this relieve pressure stuff. Pressure is a privilege and the young need to practice it or they won’t get better at it, and that was an ideal opportunity for practicing under pressure.I assume he was trying to relieve the pressure on the young guys by giving them some 'freedom' to throw it around and have fun. (I bet they had a great time - not)! As I said, he would have learnt a lot from that one. Terrible coaching error - rookie mistake.
I'm not so sure.Spoon bowl was a major coaching stuff up. He gets 100% credit for that one. I'm not talking him up; I'm on the fence, but I haven't seen evidence that he can't. Plenty of opinions based on results.
Great post.RG,
Thanks for your take, but most of what you have provided are opinions as opposed to examples. While I expect that some of these are contibutors to our poor performance in and of themselves they don't indicate that he is a shit coach.
Two wooden spoons may be partly attributed to coaching but the player roster probably has more bearing on that, and the playing roster can be linked to the previous selection committee and board. I don't think you can ditectly link tow wooden spoons to poor coaching; the facts just don't support that conclusion. Could a more experineced coach have got us over the line - perhaps but not to the extent we were pushing for the eight with the roster we had. I can fully support that poor coaching cost us the spoon bowl - but that would have moved us from 17th the 16th. No change really.
So who was constantly picked out of position? I didn't recall this as an issue. I would suggest that this is a matter of opinion as opposed to an example of poor coaching. To me this is a generalisation as opposed to evidence of poor coaching. How wna when did this cause our poor performances?
I would have preferred to ease Galvin into FG as well; however, he is not the first 18 year old to debut and play FG; many in teams with successful coaches. Giving young players exposure, even at 18, can fast-track their development. Injuries and overplaying are legitimate concerns, but the responsibility for player welfare involves multiple staff, not just the head coach. So you I expect we are looking at the high perfromance and medical teams as well. Our arm chair opinions don't carry much weight here. Who would you have replaced him with? Sulivan - and if he did and had Galvin in Reggies people would be calling for his head for playing Sullivan instead of the kid, No win and not an example of poor coaching. On the other hand plenty of seasoned commentators are signing his praises for taking the approach he did with Galvin. Johns and Gus decelaring him a revelation at the Tigers and the best teen they have ever seen. This is a matter of opinion as opposed to evidence of him being a poor coach.
I don't think you can say there was a lack of a defensive game plan. In fact when they executed the defensive game plan well we perfromed well. There were times when we had good line speed, times when we had very good chase, time when we didn't have shooters in the line causing holes. When we put it together for 80 minutes we won games. We had too many lapses - was that fitness, player ability (AD/Sezer/The Pillow for example). I highly doubt that we didn't spend time coaching a workable defensive game plan, The evidence clearly shows that we did; what we don't know is why we couldn't put it together for the duration of the game. Too complex - haven't heard that anywhere - all indications are that he simplified the game plans.
I'm struggling to understand how Benji's coaching was responsible for the lack of discipline from the playing group. He sacked Naden for it, Bateman was exiled as a result of being called out for it, Seyfarth reeled it in, Sezer was going to be replaced by?????. If anything he was very clear, and in the pressers as well, that he was not happy with the discipline and that if the plyers didn't change the would change the players. I don't buy this at all.
There is a balance between being one of the boys and being the coach. Unless you are on the inside how can anyone say if he has it right or wrong. I am not hearing anything from inside of the camp that support this - in fact most of the players when interviewd say the oipposite- he gets in with theboys and shows them what he wants and is also very direct and calls a spade a spade. We have heard that he has taken a very different approach to this pre season as well. Have you considered that being “one of the boys” might actually help foster a supportive environment, particularly for a team in transition or rebuilding mod? Benji’s experience and charisma could be what turns us around. I'm not saying at all that he has the balance right - but I don't see any evidence that supports your opinion. I'm on the fence with this.
How do you link the approach to pressers to being a poor coach. This is a stretch and again a matter of opinion, You coule equally argue that publicly backing the team, even in tough times, shields players from external pressures and media scrutiny. You can bet that Benji's Monday morning video sessions don't include his press comments. What do you know about his internal accountability measures? I doubt this is visible to outsiders, so if you have evidence to support the point I am all ears but this is purely opinion.
Look I get that we haven't performed well. I'm on the fence as to his coaching ability as there is evidence to suggest that the plying group have been instructed on what to do, but have failed to execute it. They boys on the Wests Tigers Faithful podcast did an excellent breakdown of our performace over 2024 and one of the more telling facts was where we were receiving the ball from and turning the ball over to the opposition. So we weren't able to get out of our end - that isn't coaching that the poor roster. The attackign stats in several areas were at the top of the league and some of our defensive stats were also OK. So the evidence does not support the opinions that many had in realtion to poor attack and defence.
Benji's coaching career is just beginning. Judging him on early results ignores the possibility of growth, refinement, and the impact of long-term strategies. Strategies that Benji and Richo have stated on many occasions are in place and they are not deviating from the pla. The team needs time to be adapted to this vision and strategy. Despite Benji being here for a couple of years the vision and strategy started in 2024.
Every coach starts somewhere, and while early results or decisions may be polarising, it's crucial to give time for development and see where his leadership takes the team. So at the end of the day I still seen haven't seen much evidence that supports the statements that his coaching is poor. I have seen no evidence that supports the statements that he is shit coach; just plenty of opinion.
He has definitely made mistakes, but what coach hasn't? Until somone provides evidence that his coaching is poor I'm still sitting on the fence and giving him some more rope.
So what are your thoughts on the money that Latu Fainu is supposedly on $500k ?Galvin at most is a 450-500K player he's done nothing just alot of promise and 500K is way overs but he's at the Tigers
Intelligent reply as always JollsRG,
Thanks for your take, but most of what you have provided are opinions as opposed to examples. While I expect that some of these are contibutors to our poor performance in and of themselves they don't indicate that he is a shit coach.
Two wooden spoons may be partly attributed to coaching but the player roster probably has more bearing on that, and the playing roster can be linked to the previous selection committee and board. I don't think you can ditectly link tow wooden spoons to poor coaching; the facts just don't support that conclusion. Could a more experineced coach have got us over the line - perhaps but not to the extent we were pushing for the eight with the roster we had. I can fully support that poor coaching cost us the spoon bowl - but that would have moved us from 17th the 16th. No change really.
So who was constantly picked out of position? I didn't recall this as an issue. I would suggest that this is a matter of opinion as opposed to an example of poor coaching. To me this is a generalisation as opposed to evidence of poor coaching. How wna when did this cause our poor performances?
I would have preferred to ease Galvin into FG as well; however, he is not the first 18 year old to debut and play FG; many in teams with successful coaches. Giving young players exposure, even at 18, can fast-track their development. Injuries and overplaying are legitimate concerns, but the responsibility for player welfare involves multiple staff, not just the head coach. So you I expect we are looking at the high perfromance and medical teams as well. Our arm chair opinions don't carry much weight here. Who would you have replaced him with? Sulivan - and if he did and had Galvin in Reggies people would be calling for his head for playing Sullivan instead of the kid, No win and not an example of poor coaching. On the other hand plenty of seasoned commentators are signing his praises for taking the approach he did with Galvin. Johns and Gus decelaring him a revelation at the Tigers and the best teen they have ever seen. This is a matter of opinion as opposed to evidence of him being a poor coach.
I don't think you can say there was a lack of a defensive game plan. In fact when they executed the defensive game plan well we perfromed well. There were times when we had good line speed, times when we had very good chase, time when we didn't have shooters in the line causing holes. When we put it together for 80 minutes we won games. We had too many lapses - was that fitness, player ability (AD/Sezer/The Pillow for example). I highly doubt that we didn't spend time coaching a workable defensive game plan, The evidence clearly shows that we did; what we don't know is why we couldn't put it together for the duration of the game. Too complex - haven't heard that anywhere - all indications are that he simplified the game plans.
I'm struggling to understand how Benji's coaching was responsible for the lack of discipline from the playing group. He sacked Naden for it, Bateman was exiled as a result of being called out for it, Seyfarth reeled it in, Sezer was going to be replaced by?????. If anything he was very clear, and in the pressers as well, that he was not happy with the discipline and that if the plyers didn't change the would change the players. I don't buy this at all.
There is a balance between being one of the boys and being the coach. Unless you are on the inside how can anyone say if he has it right or wrong. I am not hearing anything from inside of the camp that support this - in fact most of the players when interviewd say the oipposite- he gets in with theboys and shows them what he wants and is also very direct and calls a spade a spade. We have heard that he has taken a very different approach to this pre season as well. Have you considered that being “one of the boys” might actually help foster a supportive environment, particularly for a team in transition or rebuilding mod? Benji’s experience and charisma could be what turns us around. I'm not saying at all that he has the balance right - but I don't see any evidence that supports your opinion. I'm on the fence with this.
How do you link the approach to pressers to being a poor coach. This is a stretch and again a matter of opinion, You coule equally argue that publicly backing the team, even in tough times, shields players from external pressures and media scrutiny. You can bet that Benji's Monday morning video sessions don't include his press comments. What do you know about his internal accountability measures? I doubt this is visible to outsiders, so if you have evidence to support the point I am all ears but this is purely opinion.
Look I get that we haven't performed well. I'm on the fence as to his coaching ability as there is evidence to suggest that the plying group have been instructed on what to do, but have failed to execute it. They boys on the Wests Tigers Faithful podcast did an excellent breakdown of our performace over 2024 and one of the more telling facts was where we were receiving the ball from and turning the ball over to the opposition. So we weren't able to get out of our end - that isn't coaching that the poor roster. The attackign stats in several areas were at the top of the league and some of our defensive stats were also OK. So the evidence does not support the opinions that many had in realtion to poor attack and defence.
Benji's coaching career is just beginning. Judging him on early results ignores the possibility of growth, refinement, and the impact of long-term strategies. Strategies that Benji and Richo have stated on many occasions are in place and they are not deviating from the pla. The team needs time to be adapted to this vision and strategy. Despite Benji being here for a couple of years the vision and strategy started in 2024.
Every coach starts somewhere, and while early results or decisions may be polarising, it's crucial to give time for development and see where his leadership takes the team. So at the end of the day I still seen haven't seen much evidence that supports the statements that his coaching is poor. I have seen no evidence that supports the statements that he is shit coach; just plenty of opinion.
He has definitely made mistakes, but what coach hasn't? Until somone provides evidence that his coaching is poor I'm still sitting on the fence and giving him some more rope.
Great post.
My opinion is he has proven to be a poor coach thus far. Yes that is just an opinion and just based on results but those results are not just the spoons. We have seen he has failed to motivate and even fallen out with multiple quality players (JOffa, Nofoaluma, Bateman, Utoikamanu, Papallii as well as reportedly Klemmer, Naden). That is a long list for such a short career. Some on that list could be written off as aligned with the previous coach, or issues with the individual more so the coach, others however were signed by him (well by Sheens with Marshall having final say is what we were told) and should not be brushed over.
One thing you however noted that gives me hope is that he should be learning from his mistakes. Unlike other more experienced coaches who have already made their errors and learnt from them Marshall's inexperience means he has a lot to learn. The hope is he learns his lessons and improves his coaching to where we can believe he is a good coach, more so than hope he is/will be.
This is his first season with pretty much the whole roster being 'his' and he has got the big name recruit. I think he should be given the chance to show significant improvement with his roster. Do I expect him to succeed? No, I think his inexperience will hold him back as well as I think the trend of falling out with players should not be ignored. I also question if he has the right personality for a coach. That doesn't mean I'm against him. I'm hopeful he can prove me wrong.
I'm sure the Galvin family and Richo are Thinking the exact same thing.So what are your thoughts on the money that Latu Fainu is supposedly on $500k ?
I know who we got value for money from in 2024
Like I said at the Tigers specialist in paying oversSo what are your thoughts on the money that Latu Fainu is supposedly on $500k ?
I know who we got value for money from in 2024
Luai was offered 700K on his third offer from Penrith and at the time a 3 time premiership winner and over 100 first grade gamesNot even a half decent first grade five eight gets that piddling amount.
Wow has Galvin done anything? Has he played 25 first grade games he helped win his first spoonNot even a half decent first grade five eight gets that piddling amount.
I think the fact all the players he supposedly fell out with , have a legacy of getting offside with coaching staff is a pretty big factor in this .Interesting how different people see things- see I don’t see Benji’s “falling out” as you call it, as a Benji problem so much. Furthermore I don’t agree with the description of those particular players as “quality NRL players” specifically, particularly with regards to the way they played at the Tigers, especially in recent seasons.
Every one of the players you have mentioned had specific performance issues that Benji called them out on - some might say that it needed to be done and applaud him for doing it when previous coaches never seemed to want to.
Also, I think it’s yet to be seen whether his “failures” in this area lead us to a better squad and better results. Certainly I for one am not unhappy that he has made it clear what he is expecting from experienced players and I am also not unhappy that the players you mentioned are on the outer or already “outed”!